Friday, February 27, 2009

'Obama to Seek New Assault Weapons Ban' (ABC News)

With a Marxist operative regime in the White House and a Marxist "progressive" ruling over Congress, the threat of an "assault weapons" ban (by the "Attorney General" who sides with terrorists) should be like a bottle of ammonia thrust under America's nose.

America's founding fathers knew well the danger of state authoritarianism and that the Citizens' ownership and training in the concerted use of firepower equivalent to that carried by a national military was "necessary to the security of a free State." They also knew that attempts by a national power to confiscate the people's weaponry was an alarm for the people and their militias to heed the requirement to put that weaponry to use.

Now, a gun sales ban is once again being proffered. What should sovereign Americans do about it?

The Obama administration will seek to reinstate the assault weapons ban that expired in 2004 during the Bush administration, Attorney General Eric Holder said today.

PHOTO Wednesday Attorney General Eric Holder said that the Obama administration will seek to reinstitute the assault weapons ban which expired in 2004 during the Bush administration.
Wednesday Attorney General Eric Holder said that the Obama administration will seek to reinstitute the assault weapons ban which expired in 2004 during the Bush administration. (AP Photos/ABC News Graphic )

"As President Obama indicated during the campaign, there are just a few gun-related changes that we would like to make, and among them would be to reinstitute the ban on the sale of assault weapons," Holder told reporters.

Holder said that putting the ban back in place would not only be a positive move by the United States, it would help cut down on the flow of guns going across the border into Mexico, which is struggling with heavy violence among drug cartels along the border.

"I think that will have a positive impact in Mexico, at a minimum." Holder said at a news conference on the arrest of more than 700 people in a drug enforcement crackdown on Mexican drug cartels operating in the U.S.

excerpted, article continues

And, how does the sale of a rifle between two Americans lead to the breakdown of order generated by Mexican criminals? Let us ask Mr. Holder, Ms. Pelosi, and Mr. Obama/Soetoro to draw that out for us, on a flow chart. They appear to have things pictured in reverse -- such is the way of the Marxist.

h/t: Carmen

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

Does anyone have an on-going list started detailing how many articles and amendments to the Constitution this administration has bruised, crushed or somehow broken so far?

Carlyle said...

Where's Victor? We need him to explain how and why this is good for America. To me, this is just further proof that Zero hates America.

lil fuzzy said...

What you miss is that the Mexican GOVERNMENT SAYS THE PROBLEM IS MILITARY fully automatic weapons and Grenades in the hand of narcoterrorists.The American ban proposed is for semiautomatic weapons which have absolutely nothing to do with the situation in Mexico.

Anonymous said...

Being anti-gun control to protect your home is one issue... being anti-gun control to allow citizens to carry fully-automatic weapons is totally different. What rationale can you possibly have to warrant the necessity of assault weapons in conservative homes?

Carlyle said...

Fully automatic weapons have been illegal for US citizens to own since, what, 1934. That is not an issue. Anti-gun proponents are masters at making up slick names and labels to confuse the issue. Please research carefully what and what is not being discussed and controlled.