Friday, June 12, 2009

Terminology 101, Continued: Transnational Progressivism

Babel -- still trying to put that tower back, with those flood-proof bricks

Back in November (you remember November, right? -- it had that weird day in it, early on in the month, that ended in all that eeriness in Grant Park, Chicago) I.O. posted a term: anarcho-syndicalism. We still intend to discuss that term, here.

But for now, I will post another term for us to understand and understand well:

transnational progressivism

Or, do you like our label, global Marxofascism? Or, movement for the globally controlled society? Or, worldwide thuggery? Or, do you like the term, Satan overplaying his hand again, with no Antichrist-level talent in sight?

You can look that up yourself, if you like, on... "the Web."
I knew ya could
.

9 comments:

Anonymous said...

I prefer Islamocommunism.

Anonymous said...

That all depends on what the goal is in using any terminology.If it is to analyze what is taking place we can use the above terms.If we are looking to educate the masses it is much simpler to use the phrases the conspirators themselves use.The New World Order may seem passe because it has been tossed about for so many years,but it is what can be proven to naysayers in numerous quotes,many of which have been posted here in the comments section.So,it's not a matter of right or wrong here as you stated about two months ago.I use the term Fascist New World Order because it is easy for most people to understand.It is the end product of communist,socialist,marxist,and fascist ideologies that have been wedded to each other and used for the goal of supranationalism or one world governance under the Antichrist.Transnationalism and Progressivism are part and parcel of that goal.And progressivism is a euphemism,as is communitarianism,for Socialist-Communism.That phrase softens the the whole shebang.And the last one is inaccurate,because although Satan always overplays his hand,the ineptitude of governments and individual rulers was planned long ago so that the masses would cry out for one leader to rule them.I don't have aproblem with throwing in the words Marxo or Islamo in a term,but frankly it gets lost on most people.But then so too does the words Illuminati,Freemasonry,and the phrase Power Elite on a dumbed down populace.Having said that,I enjoy breaking down movements and discussing history and what is going on in the world.I just think it would help if there were longer posts instead of linking to articles on the Cloward-Piven strategy.We live in times where people will dismiss conspiracies unless the time is taken to explain them in both a technical sense and then bringing it down to a level where they can see these things are true and hapening now.Sad,yes.But it is true....m

Anonymous said...

The point I'm making is not a criticism,but rather a suggestion that you share your thoughts in longer blogs or in the comments as opposed to links to other's works and a brief comment on it.If a position is to be flushed out and expounded upon it has to go beyond someone reading a thesis by another blogger,and then parsing terminologies.Sometimes I feel we are alone here..lol..but the post last week brought comments form others,and as expected the regular commercial from Sam.So,keep up the good work,Arlen.Besides,I'd rather read fewer comments that have good information,than several hundred opining on their opinion on why We The People are being mistreated by a corrupt government and controlled mainstream media.And the incredibly naive suggestions on how to resolve our loss of liberties.Nothing wrong with that,but backing up a position or opinion with historical facts would be nice.For intance,thinking the msm just needs to be educated on isuuse has no basis in reality.Same with politicians.But the claim that they are controlled by corporatists and unelected organizations can be proven.Saying there are no plans for world government or planned depopulation is being detached from reality.Those plans exist,can be proven,and are now out in the open for anyone to see and verify if they so choose.

Anonymous said...

Even though we can see a guy like Barry being a stuttering clown,the world does see him as a messiah,so it is incorrect to state that there are no Antichrist-level players in the world.The masses are being fooled by many antichrists in the world.

Anonymous said...

Another eason to use the terminology of the ruling elite cabal is that they are working on a global level that oversees,and in fact created,these other movements that operate on national levels.The goal is not about turning America into another USSR,but rather dropping it to third world staus,and merging it into one of the ten regions of the one world government.Therin lies the difference between Marxism and Globalism and the real movers and shalers in the world.The elites are Luciferians and are using not only Marxism but the religions of Islam and Judaism to bring about WW3.The terrorist groups and Marxists are thrown out into the open to give people a known enemy to combat.And although the real enemies have been exposed for two centuries the control wielded over governments,finance,education,and media ensures that all those whistleblowers that share the truth are labeled crazies.

Anonymous said...

Even Barry uses the phrase World Order.The old dinosaur Kissinger is still touting the New World Order.And anyone researching a Onew World Government or Fascist New Wordl Order will soon learn it about a one world religion as well as a one world government.Not so when researching Marxism.And the Illuminists are not muslims as pointed out above so the subject of Islamo-Fascism needs to put in a proper context.Again,nothing wrong with those terms.I just find that they are not all-encompassing in describing the world takeover by the elites.

Anonymous said...

The prominent role Marxism plays in all this can be found in Red Symphony,and confirmed when Gorby left the former USSR after the staged fall,and was set up by the capitalists at the Presidio,and pushed the NWO with his UN work.And Rocky visiting Krutschev decades ago,and days later seeing a regime change.Or looking at the events of the Yalta Conference.The evidence is there.It's just been buried in the vaults of the Ministry Of Truth in our Orwellian world.

Anonymous said...

Do a little test.Ask a few friends to define the above terms,and then ask them to define a New Wordl Order.Or do a google search on the above terminolgies and then one on one world government or new world order and check the numbers.Or title an article Fascist New World Order and in a few eeks compare the hits you get in comparison to the day you posted this one.When people hear world leaders talking about world government and interdependany of nations those are the phrases they'll use to research what it means.

Anonymous said...

I'd say the terms you usually use for explaining the strategies of the current administration,but a new world order or something similar for the globalist explanation.On the lighter side there is also "Urban Renewal" that has been redefined.[smile] see post 252 in the open thread.