Friday, August 14, 2009

Jill Stanek: Section 1233 Authors are Major Proponents of Euthanasia, Assisted Suicide

Rep. Earl Blumenauer - another self-made enemy of America, in Congress

Defenders of American Popular Sovereignty must do our own investigation of global Marxofascists (they euphemistically call themselves Transnational Progressives or Communitarians). We must expose them. The following does that.

Please heed this article by Jill Stanek, the woman who exposed botched abortion infanticide and Barack Obama's unconstrained thirst for it.
Section 1233 authors are major proponents of euthanasia, assisted suicide

I wrote August 10 about the now infamous Section 1233 in a House version of the nationalized healthcare plan, which has concerned even healthcare proponents as pushing euthanasia on the elderly.

Kudos to FRC's The Cloakroom (here and here) for drawing attention to the fact that the 2 authors of Section 1233 are major proponents of euthanasia and assisted suicide.

blumenauer.jpg


The first is Oregon Congressman Earl Blumenauer. Recall Oregon was the 1st state to legalize physician assisted suicide almost 12 years ago. Blumenauer wrote on Huffington Post July 28:

Rep. Buck McKeon admonished people to read the bill and then specifically cited Section 1233. Actually, I know a little bit about this section because it's a bill that I wrote which was incorporated into the overall legislation.

Blumenauer wrote an amicus brief in support of assisted suicide in a case before the U.S. Supreme Court in 2005, Gonzalez vs. Oregon....


harpers right to die.jpgBluemenauer also links on his website to a 1960 Harper's magazine article (see right) promoting both voluntary and involuntary euthanasia.

The group Compassion & Choices, formerly known as the Hemlock Society. is also says it had a hand in crafting Section 1233, writing July 27:

Compassion & Choices has worked tirelessly with supportive members of congress to include in proposed reform legislation a provision requiring Medicare to cover patient consultation with their doctors about end-of-life choice (section 1233 of House Bill 3200).

Compassion & Choices calls itself part of the "aid-in-dying movement." About itself Compassion & Choices writes:

... An organization dedicated to care of terminally ill patients, including those seeking a hastened death....

Compassion & Choices... improves care and expands choice at the end of life....

Our professional staff and trained volunteers help thousands of clients each year by... guiding their search for a peaceful, humane death....

We offer information on self-determined dying....

Our team of litigators and legislative experts fights bills that would force patients to endure futile, invasive treatment....

compassion and choices.jpg

Come again that promotion of euthanasia isn't part of Section 1233?

You can visit this article in JillStanek.com for additional comments by her erudite readers. And, you may wish to keep checking into her work, for it's excellent Declarationist reporting and commentary for our most essential human right.

Hanen and I also had the privilege of having Jill as our special guest, this past March 2, to discuss the Soros/Obama/Pelosi regime and it's attack upon our human rights: "The Awakening, with Hanen & Arlen," Special Guest: Jill Stanek.

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

Obama is Muslim, his religion Islam teaches that killing non-Muslims and cleansing the earth of them is NCESSARY!

Thus it comes as no surprise that Obama's health care "reform" bill would put the Obama in charge of our health en masse whereby Obama would be placing himself in a position in which he could easily have American people killed covertly by jihadists positioned in hospitals and health care centers (by HIM).

Thus the hidden euthanasia Obama has planned for Americans is probably part part of a jihad planned by Obama and such radical Islamic organizations as the Muslim Brotherhood and the OIC.

Obama and his crones should be tried at the Internation Criminal Court for conspiracy to commit mass homicide. (Or jihad).

Anonymous said...

The Obama White House is abuzz with talk of witchcraft by first grandmother, 72-year-old Marian Robinson, who lives in the White House residence. A close friend of Michelle Obama says the president is furious at his mother-in-law after learning that she was practicing Santeria, an African spirit cult, in the White House.
http://countusout.wordpress.com/

Anonymous said...

Ed's new forum-reply to mod ruler Linda-
Do you think it really matters to intelligent people if they have your approval? I understand your goal.But it is infantile,in that this isn't a legal blog like Leo's which you are clearly trying to emulate----- the {snip} gave it away.This forum is the same as the last one.Honest posts critical of P.T.Barnum Hale gets thrown down the memory hole as this one will be.I saw it the first day.The poll meter had Ed losing,so it was removed and a post by Ed said it was 25-0 in his favor.His first show had him bashing former members including Jackson,and she has done more with her new network than Ed would ever accomplish in a lifetime.He used the word "obot" on the air and in posts.At the last forum he turned on Orly.You could see through Lan but never caught on to the lies of Ed.

Anonymous said...

The Berg-Taitz-Hale Combine has done more damage to the eligbility issue than will ever be known by most people[the BC distraction].I have never engaged in the direct namecalling game,although there is nothing wrong with using euphemisms to paint a word pictue about the cultists[Obama's and Ed's and the BC celeb lawyers],but to dictate what others can say outside of using expletives is defeating the purpose of having an open forum to share information on the destruction of this erstwhile great nation.The nonsensical rules you have here are so hypocritical it isn't even funny.If there is any banning it should be against those that are promoting the fascist policies of the Marxist-Socialists in D.C.Not playing a Kindergarten teacher over debate between adults.Ed isn't in control of this new network huh?Then why did he just post that Caren was laid off and they might not do shows for the umpteenth time?If Mickey bought them out,why would spending time on the air matter?There's patriotic sites that have documented Ed's shenanigans,and they are not "obots".They did it because of the strange connections with the celeb lawyers and the games played by these opportunists.Ed is happy about all the hits.Why?It isn't his network.Shouldn't he be concerned with the truth getting out and not the headache of the business anymore?Linda,you should know better.Many of us come here just to see what misdirectional ploys are being spun.I have never posted before here or at the last forum and do not plan on doing so in the future.This is mainly for you.I remember you leaving a long comment on Lan' site.I left many along the same vein.I was appalled at that charlaten.And yet,you still think Barnum is legit?

Anonymous said...

If you want to see an objective look at the weekly circus that plains has taken patriots to and bilked them emotionally and otherwise,there are blogs and websites that have documented them as they occurred.You know,each time Barnum has crossed people,he loses a chunk of supprters.It must be down to a dozen or so by now.Don't be fooled by any hit counter.As the funds dwindled,new tactics were required.And the record speaks for itself.Much of it was recorded prior to being tossed down the memory hole.But you believe what you want to believe.Just don't be a hypocrite about it.After two or three months the last froum was full of children exchanging barbs at one another,and it is now a joke.Would you like me to post some of Ed's comments the past few months that prove his stance?They were scrubbed in five minutes,but I and others got them.Have you forgotten how he turned on some patriots and then went back and then turned again?Or calling people vulgar names for not donating? Or using a timer and having a "debate" with the opposition to gain ratings?As if we do not have enough of their propaganda in the controlled mainstream media.What does it take to wake people up? There is a thing called psychological warfare.It includes disinformation and misinformation and trojan horses.Didn't think it was odd that Barnum chummed it up with Berg after the sideshow in Philly?Didn't you think it odd that he told everyone the fight was over months ago?That Plains was shutting down several times the past six months? That "we got'em" was beat to death until that dog refused to hunt?That playing dumb or the victim doesn't jive with facts?That he is the first one to cuss and call intelligent people with valid questions "obots"? And still does to this day??? That you allowing the clever sarcasm by Leftists and censoring the simpleton's posts for using the word"obot" is hypocritical?If I though this forum was worth it,I could level heavy sarcasm in a cogent manner against the opposition,but it would serve no purpose.I just feel sorry for the dozen or so suckers that still think Barnum is some kind of folk hero.Especially Ken Duncebar.He actually thinks Plains did important work in this eligbility saga.If you want to read about these things,let me know.I'll post links at your blog in the comments section.Wake up Linda.You are not that gullible.At least I hope not.I'm thinking you are playing along wioth Ed just to have a power postion as a mighty moderator.You see the digs by the Leftists here?Conspiracy theorists and so on?That is more harmful than letting people vent a little.Grow up!This isn't Leo's blog,and never will be.Ed was prudent in choosing moderators? Are you kidding me?And if this is not Ed's network or forum any longer what right does he have doing so? Oh...I forgot.Just helpin' old Mickey out.Come on.Even the dim bulbs that haven't caught onto him should see through this latest ploy at reinventing himself.Did you think it was ethical of Barnum to read private conversations in chats?Or lie about fromer members?And yes,this post will be put in the files of the rest of the honest critical comments of Barnum for the record to show people how there is no honest exchange of ideas at the new and improved forum.Because if you don't remove it,Ed will.Or he'll get old Hummingbird to do it.The truth hurts too much to let it stand.You say Ed is not running this forum.Well,like others here,I know it hasn't lasted 24 hours without the truth being tossed down the memory hole.I've seen it already.Many posts that had no inflammatory language were removed because they spoke the truth,and it rubbed Ed the wrong way.He sees other's faults but never his own.