tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3305538081521812448.post251030829605202703..comments2023-10-06T09:11:05.534-05:00Comments on Investigating Obama: Orly Taitz: Urgent! What Needs to be Done NowArlen Williamshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05622001066158701142noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3305538081521812448.post-34239131581918415552008-12-15T08:42:00.000-06:002008-12-15T08:42:00.000-06:00In cases where a child is given the same name as a...In cases where a child is given the same name as a relative who is not the child's mother or father, it is considered correct to give the child a numerical suffix. For example, a child named John William Scott, after his uncle John William Scott, would properly be considered John William Scott II, as opposed to "Junior." Junior is not used because, in this example, John William Scott is not the child of John William Scott senior. If John William Scott II were to have a son, he could then be named, John William Scott III or John William Scott Jr., depending upon the family. While it is not technically the social norm to use "II" in place of "junior" for children born directly to a same named parent, there is no social rule against the usage of "II" instead of "junior" for a same named child. Often, II is used by families who want to avoid having their children referred to as "junior" as a nickname.<BR/>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Junior_(suffix)#Socialj.t.https://www.blogger.com/profile/07752150387231194479noreply@blogger.com