tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3305538081521812448.post5056844412119368165..comments2023-10-06T09:11:05.534-05:00Comments on Investigating Obama: Interview, Orly Taitz: Chief Justice Roberts Calls Conference on Obama Challenge: Lightfoot v. BowenArlen Williamshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05622001066158701142noreply@blogger.comBlogger32125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3305538081521812448.post-65739867003834851352009-01-21T21:45:00.000-06:002009-01-21T21:45:00.000-06:00Obama.s BC plus 3 affadavits from Hawaii were sent...Obama.s BC plus 3 affadavits from Hawaii were sent to Supreme Court, shortly after receipt of these, all cases concerning Obama's BC were removed from docket. <BR/>Berg's case didn't depend on BC so is still on docket but is shown as "denied"Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3305538081521812448.post-14542723988439537272009-01-21T20:52:00.000-06:002009-01-21T20:52:00.000-06:00Though it would obviously be denied, Orly's case h...Though it would obviously be denied, Orly's case has been removed from the scotus docket, Orly's mad. <BR/><BR/>case was denied by Kennedy and resubmitted to Roberts who scheduled it for conference (a neat way for all to deny at once)<BR/>it has now been removed!<BR/><BR/>scheduled for conference does not mean they will cover the case!<BR/><BR/>all you people need a new hobby, this one is over. the time for hate is over!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3305538081521812448.post-19340797701474514002009-01-21T17:42:00.000-06:002009-01-21T17:42:00.000-06:00Berg case is toast as of 1/21/2009Orly's case is c...Berg case is toast as of 1/21/2009<BR/>Orly's case is currently in the toaster<BR/><BR/>Birthers have space reverved in dust bin of history, please go quitely!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3305538081521812448.post-47760505982003572022009-01-21T01:27:00.000-06:002009-01-21T01:27:00.000-06:00WWW.SPIRITLESSONS.COMWWW.SPIRITLESSONS.COMAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3305538081521812448.post-45547693115964370092009-01-21T01:25:00.000-06:002009-01-21T01:25:00.000-06:00MUCH MORE important than all these issues!!! PLEAS...MUCH MORE important than all these issues!!! PLEASE look here- PLEASE:<BR/><BR/><BR/> http://www.spiritlessons.com/Mary_K_Baxter_A_Divine_Revelation_of_Hell.htmAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3305538081521812448.post-75964158537402483682009-01-19T05:43:00.000-06:002009-01-19T05:43:00.000-06:00ConstitutionWatch.org has been on the sidelines du...ConstitutionWatch.org has been on the sidelines during the discussion of Barack Obama's status as a natural born citizen. Just before his inauguration-they have jumped into the battle with both feet.<BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://bloggingredneck.blogspot.com/2009/01/constitutuionwatchorg-jumps-into-obama.html" REL="nofollow">ConstitutionWatch.org jumps into the Obama birth certificate fray</A>Bluegrass Pundithttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13692965298692361473noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3305538081521812448.post-77327150223646520212009-01-10T13:52:00.000-06:002009-01-10T13:52:00.000-06:00i have posted my first article on newsvine, PLEASE...i have posted my first article on newsvine, PLEASE go to the link and comment as many times as you can to try and push it to the front page http://bdimainman.newsvine.com/_news/2009/01/10/2295937-us-supreme-court-fires-warning-shotAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3305538081521812448.post-48464413766929661682009-01-09T17:40:00.000-06:002009-01-09T17:40:00.000-06:00Thank you Anon. Currently item #3 in the I.O. "ab...Thank you Anon. Currently item #3 in the I.O. "above the bottom bar" post.Arlen Williamshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05622001066158701142noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3305538081521812448.post-75501978954618795972009-01-09T17:25:00.000-06:002009-01-09T17:25:00.000-06:00It should be noted that today's SCOTUS conference ...It should be noted that today's SCOTUS conference has resulted in the publication of some Miscellaneous Orders (http://www.supremecourtus.gov/orders/courtorders/010909zr.pdf) but there is no mention of 08-4340 (Berg v. Obama et al.)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3305538081521812448.post-87457232187866787222009-01-09T15:40:00.000-06:002009-01-09T15:40:00.000-06:00Victor,Then only pertinent case law findable is Pe...Victor,<BR/><BR/>Then only pertinent case law findable is Perkins v. ELG. It is corroborative of the real meaning of <I>natural born Citizen</I>.<BR/><BR/>Also, you are now ignoring the matters of jurisdiction and standing written of, in this blog.<BR/><BR/>The Supreme Court has not given answers, nor said that it disagrees (with John Jay, the framers, Vatel, Tucker, Bingham, etc.).<BR/><BR/>You appear to be dancing in the dishonest agitprop and tossing it into the air. How many sites are you doing this in?Arlen Williamshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05622001066158701142noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3305538081521812448.post-74078403369652697832009-01-09T10:38:00.000-06:002009-01-09T10:38:00.000-06:00Arlen, I take you reply to mean that the same, dis...Arlen, I take you reply to mean that the same, dismissed arguments against Barack Obama's status as a natural born citizen (in accordance with the Constitution) will somehow gain further weight because Gail Lightfoot was a candidate for political office.<BR/><BR/>That's a novel theory, but novelty does not guarantee success.<BR/><BR/>If the heart of the several cases' assertions is that Obama is not a natural born citizen, the overwhelming majority of case law and Supreme Court opinion disagrees.<BR/><BR/><BR/>Creating novel legal theory based on supposition, and not fact, cannot overturn established law.<BR/><BR/>As for "trolling," I would ask you a simple question: how do my actions, in expressing a dissenting voice, differ from these several cases brought against Obama and the Secretaries of State? The same theories, the same "facts" and the same assertions are brought up, time and time again. The courts have given their answers, yet the cases persist. Is that, too, evidence of trolling?Victorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00120211247834443864noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3305538081521812448.post-40525824701783772009-01-09T01:42:00.000-06:002009-01-09T01:42:00.000-06:00And paragraph 3 answers your question, Victor. No...And paragraph 3 answers your question, Victor. No other case brought the standing with the weight of Gail Lighfoot (no pun intended), while dealing with both the U.K. citizenship by BHO I disqualifier, and the failure of BHO II to present an evidentiary birth certificate.<BR/><BR/>Evidence of a troll is repeatedly picking and ankle biting, when answers have already been given.Arlen Williamshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05622001066158701142noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3305538081521812448.post-78916171003521848132009-01-08T23:24:00.000-06:002009-01-08T23:24:00.000-06:00Arlen, the question was how Lightfoot differed fro...Arlen, the question was how <I>Lightfoot</I> differed from the other challenges that have been brought to the Supreme Court and dismissed, not why it merits being described as "full-throated."Victorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00120211247834443864noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3305538081521812448.post-30098791186518781842009-01-08T23:16:00.000-06:002009-01-08T23:16:00.000-06:00Victor said... Arlen, if there were less things...<I>Victor said...<BR/> Arlen, if there were less things that needed commenting on, I would have submitted a shorter post.<BR/> That being said, it's your blog, and your rules. I'll abide by your decision, and reply with one question, and one question only:<BR/> Having read Lightfoot v. Bowen, I see that the same arguments that have been denied cert previously are still used here. Again, how does this "full-throated" challenge differ from the several cases that have been dismissed?<BR/> By the way: please consider this reply a full-throated disagreement of your characterization of my actions as "trolling."</I><BR/><BR/><B>Perhaps you a liberal poster, Victor, who wishes to find matters of truth and fact through dialogue. That is not mine to inherently know. The volume and qualities of some of those seven questions were not appealing to me, for lending you the time to answer them <I>en masse,</I> one by one. <BR/><BR/>I call this challenge full-throated in the first paragraph for its having a strong and less assailable case, of both standing and merit related in the third paragraph.</B>Arlen Williamshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05622001066158701142noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3305538081521812448.post-2737517267638161282009-01-08T21:38:00.000-06:002009-01-08T21:38:00.000-06:00And did you read her cover letter to Chief Justice...And did you read her cover letter to Chief Justice Roberts? http://www.scribd.com/doc/9693866/Orlys-Letter-to-Chief-Justice-Roberts<BR/><BR/>Puh-LEEZE, this woman shouldn't be representing anybody! What a joke!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3305538081521812448.post-4520688480870013362009-01-08T21:21:00.000-06:002009-01-08T21:21:00.000-06:00Arlen, if there were less things that needed comme...Arlen, if there were less things that needed commenting on, I would have submitted a shorter post.<BR/><BR/>That being said, it's your blog, and your rules. I'll abide by your decision, and reply with one question, and one question only:<BR/><BR/>Having read Lightfoot v. Bowen, I see that the same arguments that have been denied cert previously are still used here. Again, how does this "full-throated" challenge differ from the several cases that have been dismissed?<BR/><BR/>By the way: please consider this reply a full-throated disagreement of your characterization of my actions as "trolling."Victorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00120211247834443864noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3305538081521812448.post-18942096031005948462009-01-08T20:27:00.000-06:002009-01-08T20:27:00.000-06:00an adjective, that is :-)<I>an</I> adjective, that is :-)Arlen Williamshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05622001066158701142noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3305538081521812448.post-40149682336752824922009-01-08T20:26:00.000-06:002009-01-08T20:26:00.000-06:00Re: Anonymous said... I'm very disappointed that A...<I>Re: Anonymous said... I'm very disappointed that Arlen has so badly misrepresented the actions of the Chief Justice. As several other responses have pointed out, the "full-throated challenge" turns out to be nothing more than a referral of the case to conference, something that occurred with the Donofrio and Wrotnowski cases but quickly came to naught.</I><BR/><BR/><B>"Full-throated" was clearly a adjective to "challenge."</B><BR/><BR/><I>As of a short time ago, both houses of congress have confirmed without objection the election of Barack Obama. Any claim that opposition to his election is somehow gaining momentum is based on nothing but conspiratorial fantasy.</I><BR/><BR/><B>This is about validity and integrity in process and order of law. The lack thereof by the Congress hardly excuses the Judicial from action. Just the opposite is true.</B><BR/><BR/><I>One example: '“We’re very nicely saying that we looked into it and the evidence isn’t there,” explained one member of [Ron] Paul’s staff.' (http://washingtonindependent.com/24362/gop-senators-letters-give-anti-obama-activists-hope)</I><BR/><BR/><B>Ironically enough, that seems to be the truth; no one responsible for the certification of Barack Obama as a presidential candidate has seen the evidence of his eligibility.<BR/><BR/>But, as to the evidence he is not a natural born Citizen, that has been provided by the divorce record establishing that his father is who BHO says he is.</B>Arlen Williamshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05622001066158701142noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3305538081521812448.post-61867596026031685992009-01-08T20:19:00.000-06:002009-01-08T20:19:00.000-06:00Re: Anonymous said... You should do an updated...Re: <I> Anonymous said...<BR/> You should do an updated fact check. The National Archive shows that ALL the Electoral votes have been accounted for all fifty states. Congress can vote today as planned. January 8, 2009 9:57 AM</I><BR/>Thanks for your update, Anon. Someone will very likely verify; maybe even me.Arlen Williamshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05622001066158701142noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3305538081521812448.post-74052274627478448642009-01-08T20:15:00.000-06:002009-01-08T20:15:00.000-06:00Wow, Victor, those were a lot of questions and I j...Wow, Victor, those were a lot of questions and I just don't want to spend the time answering them all, for you. For one thing, I'd be tending to lend control of this site to you. Because of that, I've taken your post off. If you want to troll here, I'll let you come back and ask just one of your questions.Arlen Williamshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05622001066158701142noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3305538081521812448.post-74710675076729413832009-01-08T17:38:00.000-06:002009-01-08T17:38:00.000-06:00I found this Supreme Court blog for the week of Dr...I found this Supreme Court blog for the week of Dr. Taitz's conference that I thought was interesting. You can check the week of the 9th and 16th too (Philip Berg's case). <BR/><BR/>http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3305538081521812448.post-48192686091632994742009-01-08T13:00:00.000-06:002009-01-08T13:00:00.000-06:00I'm very disappointed that Arlen has so badly misr...I'm very disappointed that Arlen has so badly misrepresented the actions of the Chief Justice. As several other responses have pointed out, the "full-throated challenge" turns out to be nothing more than a referral of the case to conference, something that occurred with the Donofrio and Wrotnowski cases but quickly came to naught.<BR/><BR/>As of a short time ago, both houses of congress have confirmed without objection the election of Barack Obama. Any claim that opposition to his election is somehow gaining momentum is based on nothing but conspiratorial fantasy.<BR/><BR/>One example: '“We’re very nicely saying that we looked into it and the evidence isn’t there,” explained one member of [Ron] Paul’s staff.' (http://washingtonindependent.com/24362/gop-senators-letters-give-anti-obama-activists-hope)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3305538081521812448.post-6091856602058619922009-01-08T11:32:00.000-06:002009-01-08T11:32:00.000-06:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Victorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00120211247834443864noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3305538081521812448.post-84280736556593046772009-01-08T09:57:00.000-06:002009-01-08T09:57:00.000-06:00You should do an updated fact check. The National ...You should do an updated fact check. The National Archive shows that ALL the Electoral votes have been accounted for all fifty states. Congress can vote today as planned.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3305538081521812448.post-8291082962844333732009-01-08T09:04:00.000-06:002009-01-08T09:04:00.000-06:00You people are disturbed. Take off the tin foil h...You people are disturbed. Take off the tin foil hats, come out of your mother's basement, and take your meds.<BR/><BR/>Everything will be fine.<BR/><BR/>Do you realize you only encourage right wing supremacist lunatics like McVeigh et al? Like we need home grown people thinking we need to over throw the government because it's all a conspiracy.<BR/><BR/>Freaks.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com