Sunday, November 2, 2008

Investigating Obama: Career Path Toward a Neo-Marxist Presidency

A narrative of facts many have not heard, documented with Web links

Barack Obama, by his own book, plus the testimony of relatives and friends, was raised in quite a family. While in high school, his mother developed an affinity with a teacher who led readings from Marx. She became an atheist or agnostic and met Barack Obama Sr. in a college Russian language class - a Russian language class, circa 1960.

With no father in his home in Hawaii, he was mentored throughout his teens by Frank Marshall Davis, a man famous in communist circles, with numerous FBI files. Davis also wrote an autobiography, Sex Rebel (explicit references) which demonstrates numerous of his perversions, including pedophilia. Nothing new there, "sexual revolution" was a part of the Russia's Marxist revolution: sex is divorced from reproduction, marriage, and child rearing; abortion becomes sublime. Sexual involvement is "liberated" into mutual use.

According to a former intelligence officer who had read the FBI files, Davis laid out a generic communist plan “to take over America from within, by installing educators at all levels of our educational system, gaining control of the media, getting Liberal judges appointed, recruiting, training and backing people to be elected to public office.”

From Hawaii, Barack was on to New York and Columbia University (Bill Ayers was a neighbor there, too) and then Chicago (where Ayers returned). Obama writes of attending socialist conferences and reading Marxist books around this time. He was trained in and taught the insurgent methods of "Rules for Radicals" drafted by cynical, "transformational Marxist," Saul Alinsky. Thesis: lie, cheat, steal, etc., while making those who uphold American principles live up to impossibly high standards of institutional altruism, so that we and our liberal government fail in ridicule. Preach "change" and gradually build an activist army of the proletariat, motivated by (short sighted) self interest, for a crescendoing revolt. All, to pave the way for the "egalitarian state." And funny thing, Alinsky's book tosses an acknowledgment to Lucifer, "the very first radical," a refreshing lapse into candor.

In Chicago, Obama met his wife Michelle at the Sidley & Austin law firm, where terrorist Ayers' terrorist wife, Bernardine Dohrn worked, too. And in Chicago, they joined Jeremiah Wright's church, investing two decades and significant indoctrination of their daughters there. That is, until Wright turned his criticism from merely "God damn America," toward the one, Obama. This congregation espouses Black Liberation Theology, an institutionalization of ethnocentric bitterness and a variant of Liberation Theology, which had been conceived in South America as an attempt to sell Marxism to Christians through the clergy, misapplying portions of the Bible. Concurrently, Obama has repeatedly exhorted, "our individual salvation depends on collective salvation." While that would have been less than Good News to Christ's Apostles, Marx may have found it catchy.

Obama also shared an office for apparently three years with Ayers and fellow SDS member Michael Klonsky (a self-described Maoist communist) while taking Annenberg millions and devoting much of it to ACORN and other insurgent-socialist "community organizations" fitting the terrorist Weathermen's model. The goal? "Raise political consciousness," chiefly among black school kids. (Historically, an SDS and Weathermen objective has been to piggyback upon any black revolt in America, for their Marxist ends.) What "political consciousness?" One attractive to Ayers, a self-proclaimed anarchistic Marxist. Ayers secured the purse, thus presumably played a responsible role in setting up young Mr. Obama as chairman. They apparently formed a small circle of Chicago's education radicals.

In an overlapping circle, Obama became a member of the Marxist “New Party” in the 1990’s while maintaining membership in the Democratic Party. Soviet apologist, Alice Palmer hand picked Obama to succeed her as Illinois State Senator. He also gained an odd circle of radical Islamist, anti-Israel friends, including Khalid al Mansour, Rasheid Khalidi, and Ali Abunimah. He has connected with the radical Muslim Brotherhood and Louis Farrakhan credits Obama with a key role in organizing his 1995 “Million Man March.”

And what has Obama been doing as Senator besides running for President? Well, in 2006 he campaigned in Kenya for Raila Odinga, a communist Kenyan out of prison for a coup attempt, who allied himself with radical Islamists and their establishment of brutally oppressive Sharia law in that nation. Odinga lost and led the kind of protest that killed 1,000 to 1,500 Kenyans, mostly Christians, mostly by Muslims. Rape, too. Churches were burned. The thuggery worked and Obama's man was named Prime Minister, a "change" for which Obama allegedly raised $1M.

Many Americans are hearing about Obama's redistributionist tax and welfare/workfare plans, but do not know he wants to build (draft?) a massive, undefined "civilian national security force" as powerful and funded as our military. And, he has pledged to plan his presidential agenda in meetings with ACORN. He is also committed to the "Freedom of Choice Act," which would nullify all laws against partial birth abortion and those for parental notification, and any other restriction of abortion. So much for "Life, Liberty, and Property."

This is one page's worth of the many elements in an apparently Marxist career development of the one poised to become, of all things, United States President.

email or print and copy this article by Arlen Williams as:
1-page .html document | 1-page Adobe .pdf file | 1-page Word .doc file

Original version posted 10/24/2008

13 comments:

Winston said...

great post. Indeed, this guy wouldn't be fit to run a dog catching business, let alone the world.

Di's Kitchen said...

Okay, it's all true. It terrifies me - BUT - the great "unwashed" do not seem to care!

Thinking americans are now out numbered by individuals who are voting for a hand out. Our political system was based on educated landowners being the people responsible for filling our higher offices. Perhaps there was a reason for that? Perhaps, humor me a moment here - perhaps uneducated people make STUPID choices with out knowing the facts with out understanding what the consequences might be.

I am sad for America, she is being raped and beaten and no one can stop it.

Anonymous said...

I have a burning question that I don't hear people discussing. Obama has made clear his disdain for the Constitution. If elected, how will he take the oath of office to "preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States?" Except by lying. Under oath.

by Arlen Williams said...

If we get this document out to voters, it will help. If all voters knew what is documented here, many wold have a very different opinion of "the historic" Barack Obama.

Josh said...

So it seems like your main arguments are:

1. Association to Marxists/sexual deviants.

2. Donation to Raila Odinga.


On the first point, I don't quite understand what scares you so much that people that he knew may have believed in Marx's ideals. He has given you his full platform, do you think he is simply lying until he gets into office, and will then implement all out communism? The argument seems a bit absurd to me.

I want to take note that Frank Marshall Davis's porno-novel written under a pseudonym, was stated as "his autobiography" in your article. The very fact that you called it an autobiography (based on an an editor claiming the novel to be similar to Davis's life) leads me to suspect a certain intellectual dishonesty in your writing.

This dishonesty subtly comes again when you flatly claim the "New Party" to be Marxist. In what you cited as evidence to that fact, was simply a writer's critique claiming the group that founded the New Party (the DSA) was "quasi-marxist." Being a self-described marxist group, as you implied, is a world different than being called marxist by critics. By your logic, Obama could objectively be called a marxist without ever considering himself to be one.

On the second point, you once again claim flatly that Obama donated to his campaign, as if it is an uncontested fact. The claim which you speak of, in my research, derives from a letter written by a minister in kenya who refers to the following fax:

http://msgboard.snopes.com/politics/graphics/odinga1.pdf

"Spokesman for both Barack Obama and Raila Odinga deny that the former donated any money to the latter's campaign. The document on which this claim is based (a fax of dubious origin) purportedly reproduces an internal campaign memo from November 2007 showing a campaign contribution from "Friends of Senator BO." However, there is no political action committee (PAC) registered in the U.S. under that name (or under the name "Friends of Barack Obama" or anything similar). Moreover, a contribution from a "Friends of Joe Smith" PAC isn't the same thing as a contribution from Joe Smith himself — PACs are independent entities that can donate money to political causes without the knowledge or consent of whatever candidate they claim to be supporting."

from:
http://www.military-quotes.com/forum/barack-obama-kenya-supporting-raila-t68374.html

Keep in mind as well that the minister goes on to say, "Obama IS Muslim, and he IS racist." Without providing any evidence to her claims.

So I'd recommend you provide more evidence for your claims if you want them to carry weight, and that readers of this article be weary of what they read.

by Arlen Williams said...

Josh,

Thank you for your comments. As to your initial 1, 2: the facts suggest more than a loose collection of "associations." From parents to friend of grandparent, to those whom Obama himself claims in his book that he sought out, through Chicago's Marxist network, there is an unbroken path of birds with Marxist feathers flocking with Barack. I wonder what they have seen in him?

About Davis' sex autobiography, I read a report which, as I recall, stated that he confessed it was his. I'll be happy to review that and revise if necessary.

As to the donation, similarly, I believe there to be other evidence, but thanks for pointing this out; I should document. TBD.

As to the New Party being Marxist, keep in mind that Marxism is not just Communism. It is also "small-c communism," neo-Marxism, and basic socialism.

As to "claims," I will assert that documented facts are documented facts, that probabilities are probabilities, and critically important concerns are what they are too -- especially where Obama alternatively avoids, denies, and glosses over.

And, as to the potential of Barack Obama being a stealth Marxist, I think it is malfeasance by media and voters to disregard that possibility. That, especially since the tradition of British Fabianist socialists, Gramsci, the Cloward-Piven strategy teach this deceit.

And the Alinsky methods and "Rules" which Obama has been taught, has taught, and has extensively written about require such stealth and deceit.

See for yourself what falsehoods, broken promises, and variations of commitments Obama has displayed in this campaign, itself.

"The ends justify the means."

obbop said...

So, Obama and McCain are the best the "system" can offer us?

Well, both of them are acceptable to the ruling elite class and corporate America or those candidates would not be there.

Notice how much power the mass media has in deciding who will be candidates. Of course, the mass media is owned by elites.

Also note how little media coverage is given political parties other than the Democrats and Republicans.

The elites have determined that two parties maximum is controllable but still gives an illusion to the brainwashed masses they have some sort of say-so in the federal government.

The Founders intended the political system they created to be owned and operated by an elite class... an HONORABLE elite class who would consider the country as a whole, the masses and their own interests while running the country.

As time passed the concept of honor was diluted to what we see today.

The elite class has lost its honor and greed and the love of power has cast aside the concept of honor the Founders intended the elites to draw upon to curtail the elite's vested interests.

Thus, since the Founders intentions have failed... one option is left; rebuild the federal government.

However, the elite's entrenched power structure is too strong, too embedded.

Even a mass insurrection by the citizenry would likely fail since I am convinced the elites would willingly murder millions of citizens to maintain the status quo that keeps the elites in power.

Note the increased militarization of all levels of law enforcement, ready to quell the populace.

The elites also have the might of the armed forces to draw upon.

The citizenry are powerless.

Vot the bums out? Hah!!! Replace the bums with other bums the elites place before us to vote upon?

The "system" is finely honed to maintain the status quo.

The only method I can envision for meaningful change is a military coup by a patriotic military officer corps with a gradual return to civilian control after true actual real meaningful changes are made.

Until then... the elite class, their minions and their lackies are "running the show."

by Arlen Williams said...

Per Josh,

1. I stand behind the journalistic validity that Frank Marshall Davis' Sex Rebel is autobiographical. See the embedded link for details, pages 1-3.

2. Regarding the $1M from "Friends of BO" to Odinga, I changed the language to say, "...he allegedly raised $1M for..." and I added a link (on word, "allegedly") to a report which backs the allegation.

Lastly, Josh's depiction of my "main arguments" is clearly inaccurate. Also, that I insist that Barack Obama would "implement all out communism." That is not the way of a neo-Marxist (a.k.a., gradualist) of the Gramsci, Alinsky, Cloward-Piven school. Not even Lenin, Stalin, nor Mao were ever able to implement "all out communism," BTW. That bespeaks the futility of the effort, though Marxists continue to uphold their false ideals and so many even now, maintain the perversely Utopian "hope" of the materially egalitarian society.

And as previously stated, socialism and neo-Marxism are types of Marxism.

Doc\' said...

Who Am I ?

I'm intelligent.
I'm gifted.
I'm charismatic.
I'm an eloquent speaker.
I'm skillful and driven.
I'm fair.
I'm benevolent.
I'm a politician.
I'm seeking the highest office in the land.
I come from humble beginnings.
I represent the working class.
I speak for the average citizen.
I care about you.
I know your pain.
I know times are hard.
I know you are fed-up with the current state of affairs.
I know you've lost your sense of national pride.
I know you feel cheated.
I know you feel hopeless.
I know you feel miserable.
I know you feel unrepresented.
I know you want change.
I promise to work for you everyday.
I promise to improve your life.
I offer you inspiration.
I offer you hope.
I offer you change.

Millions love me.
Thousands attend my rallies.
They love my speeches.
Women sometimes faint when they hear me speak.
I move them to tears.
I appeal to the masses.
I inspire them.
I motivate them.
I elevate them from their despair.
I am greatly admired.
I am eagerly followed.
Some call me the "Messiah".
Some call me the "Savior".
I believe I am called by God Himself.
All want me to be their leader.


Who am I you ask?



I Am Adolf Hitler.

Let us not be fooled again by the "Cult of Personality".
"Those who do not learn from history, are doomed to repeat it"

To learn more about why Obama seems to be "repeating history",
Click the links below:

http://www.faithfreedom.org/obama.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CXlZs3WzYGU

http://www.globalpolitician.com/25109-barack-obama-elections

http://www.healthline.com/galecontent/narcissism?utm_term=narcissism&utm_medium=mw&utm_campaign=article

by Arlen Williams said...

well stated

Matt said...

My question would be "What does this all mean?" And by that I mean, if Obama is a Muslim/Terrorist/Socialist/Communist, etc. what does that mean for America? He wouldn't simply revert back to the tax brackets of the Clinton era, but rather install a fully communist government. He wouldn't help Israel, but instead destroy it. If he is as extreme as he is portrayed in this blog, then his policies and actions as President will be equally extreme. I ask this because, if he were to become President, and such things do not happen; this entire argument will be proven wrong.

Arlen Williams said...

Matt, the "neo-Marxism" of Gramsci, the Fabianist socialists, Saul Alinsky, and Frances Fox Piven -- and even Billy Ayers instruct their disciples otherwise.

Their method is: get what you can where you can, comrade, remembering not to let a silly sense of morality get in the way. (Just use a hyperbolic sense of morality for your insurgent purposes.)

And of course, deceit is critically important component in the process.

sample said...

Its from the parents what we get! Obama's parents are the best example for many to look after there children.


Career Path Questionnaire