I.O. suggest you keep an Hawaiian Eye (not a stink eye) on this heretofore quiet investigation, of whether Barack Obama's apparent birth certificate of this state has somehow been altered. And, as Leo Donofrio explains, the nearly famous official statement of Dr. Fukino about it, should open the door, under Hawaii's Open Records Law (UIPA) to the disclosure of the birth certificate, itself. Book that, Dan-o.
See this excerpt, from Donofrio's new blog article, "Pending Litigation: Hawaii Confirms That Obama’s Vital Records Have Been Amended," then read the rest of the story as it develops, at Natural Born Citizen.
I.O. will continue to monitor what could be a Magnum Opus.Section 92F-12(15) states that the following must be released to the public:
(15) Information collected and maintained for the purpose of making information available to the general public;
On July 27, 2009 Hawaii Department of Health Director Fukino issued a press release which stated:
“I, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, Director of the Hawai‛i State Department of Health, have seen the original vital records maintained on file by the Hawai‘i State Department of Health verifying Barack Hussein Obama was born in Hawai‘i and is a natural-born American citizen. I have nothing further to add to this statement or my original statement issued in October 2008 over eight months ago.”
TerriK requested all information “collected and maintained” for the purposes of preparing the public statement made by Director Fukino as such information must be released according to the statute.
can stand in the way,
of Leo D. and TerriK,
as they doggedly pursue the truth.
10 comments:
Get excited if you choose.Everything is going to revolove around Orly as this plays out to completion.Alot of things will be revealed.Meanwhile,as the mainstream media finally starts covering all the fraud and corruption that put the usurper in the oval office,the usurper will head the U.N. Security Council in time for global chaos and war.Mario's far superior case will fall by the wayside.What happens on Oct.5th or after is anyone's guess.Most likely it will survive the MTD to the amazement of the entire world and the subsequent discovery will shock the world.A trial date will be set.Defense motions will be filed.If the powderkeg in the Mid-East or contrived pandemic doesn't take place,the discovery evidence will lead to a rsignation,impeachment or on to the trial.Depends on if he was chosen to create anarchy with his downfall or rule the world.I don't think it will make it to the trial.The discovery phase will tell us which plan the elites have for sure.But it certainly is not going to have to do with true justice.The patriots uncovering him are to be commended,but make no mistake,this is controlled.The latest from Orly is good.It wasn't authored by her.After all this blundering,now we will see finesse.Not praing her.Just saying it is odd how well this last filing of hers wass written.It lays out the whole fallacy of our lack of standing if indeed we are under the original constitution.It is like Mario's and Steve's work combined.Leo would never write that way simply because he is trying to operate as if we still have a chance at justice in the proper venue,if only the case is perfect.Well,he knows better,but that is the thrust of his position.Fact is we know that any court we enter is looking to avoid this issue.Carter is either a patriot or was given the green light to let this play out.Look at what has happened in the past 9 months with regards to the shredding of the constitution.Now the past two months all of a sudden there is all this negative coverage of "Barry in the MSM.Coincidence?Sudden awakening?Not a chance.We've been distracted and misdirected for a reason.That was and is to protest up a storm while the final preparations for full blown martial law was put in place under our noses and before our very eyes.
BTW,I have been crtical of Orly for months.She's made so many mistakes that they cannot all be blamed on the corrupt system.But I was surprised when I read her oppostion to the defense's MTD yesterday.That wasn't Lincoln or her authoring that one.It was not rambling.Some bloggers have said she shouldn't have mentioned other judges or the QW issue.I disagree.It was magnificent.Read it.I don't know what Orly's intentions are.I do know that it shouldn't have taken seven months to serve the defendants and file properly.I know there were many other mistakes that show incompetence.I know that the delay has worked for the elite's advantage.I know Israel and Iran are gearing up for war.I know the miltary and police drills for civil unrest were not done for fun the past 5 months.I know that this lawsuit is no better than any other preceding it.Yet it has survived.I think it is safe to say the default that allowed it to proceed was by design.I'll leave it to the reader to connect the dots.The world's leaders touting the New World Order this year was not trivial musings of simpletons.The push for an audit of the Fed Reserve is gaining momentum.The deadline for Real ID is in December unless states can show good cause for another extension.The NAU which has a new moniker is slated for 2010.The meetings with the Pope this year,and his trip to Israel are not events that have nothing to do with a global one world religion.
The misdirection was not our fault.This was and is a real battle.The eligbility issue is vitally important.What I mean is that this constitutional crisis was planned.I though Clinton or Bush would've been the ones to declare martial law.But they just set the steage for this usurper.They passsed the EOs and draconian laws to make it easy for him to ruin the nation quickly.They were so despised by either party that this guy was accepted by the masses as a savior.Much of the wordl still believes that no matter how many people are waking up.The race card is still working for the man.The MSM is still playing their role as is a corrupt Congress.The Wison affair was staged. see: Can You Spare A MIllion For Joe Wilson
From Devvy Kidd and -- "You Lie" -- Joe Wilson Outburst a Charade by Henry Makow for a differnet perspective on that event.Look at the MSM boldly lying about the numbers at the 9-12 rally in D.C.The contempt the Reps have sown their constituents all summer long at Town Hall Meetings.Then watch the Health Care Bill get passed against the will of the people.The message of the end of the nation is a bitter pill to swallow.But burying one's head in the sand with shouts of imminent victory is not going to help when the upheaval comes.
It is good that this new information is coming to light.BUt Leo can't make up his mind what the answer is to the problem.He says the constiution is dead,as is true-we are not governed by it-yet thinks a Quo Warranto could be sucessful with the right Plaintiffs.He woul dstill be up against the same judiciary covering for Obama now.The same government that has done nothing about the criminal complaints of fraud and treason filed against Obama months ago with no action taken by our law enforcement agencies.And he doesn't understand the corporation so he would file against the wrong Defendants.The lawsuits have been dismiissed becuase our judges and DOJ know the truth of our system and how and when we lost our standing,and why the cases are dismissed on subject matter jurisdiction.They cote precedent cases and codes and statues in the motions to dismiss,but certainly aren't going to tell the whole story to the American people.But it is all there in the public record to find for any bemused Doubting Thomas.That's why Taitz's case going this far should be a clear indicator that it was planned in advance with a known predetermined outcome.
Leo has flip flopped so many times I am not holding my breath for any news coming from him anymore.Now he is hot on the birth certificate.He gives a good justification fo it,but it just anothe rone of his contradictory positions.Go over the past few months of his blogs and focus on the replies he gives readers in the comments section.I think he is very intelligent and means well.But he is one confused man.I believe I understand why he never got together with Apuzzo many months ago when they talked on the phone and it looked like they were going to work together.Apuzzo is consistent in his beliefs.I'm not saying he has a perfect case.Just saying he doesn't change his legal opinions with a tidbit of new information as if that information is of monumental importance.
First two posters:
It is easy to take a theory of "how things have conspiratorially come to be" and fit current conditions into it.
The problem comes, when you make drastic predictions, based on that theory and the time passes.
Overall, this tends to be an ad hoc world with a conniving spirit underneath its dirt. Sure, the evil one works to get people to rebuild the Tower of Babel, but it is impossible for him and his sons to do so, until the Creator allows.
Many are becoming dispirited as each attempt to shine the light of truth on the smoke and mirrors narrative of the usurper is pushed out of the courts........But as Leo has opined, in order to save the Constitution we must focus on it's strengths as purposefully as those who would destroy have focused on its weaknesses.
This is serious work and not suitable for the springtime Patriots. We are quartered in our Valley Forge and each of the cases are as if skirmishes defending our redoubt and revealing the weakness' of the enemies position.
Read each case carefully and you will find no where that it has been concluded the usurper is anything but a usurper.
CRIS ERICSON says: BIRTHERS!
REQUEST NEW FEC RULE
REQUIRING ALL PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES
TO PROVIDE THEIR
ORIGINAL LONG FORM BIRTH CERTIFICATE!
http://www.fec.gov
TITLE 11 CFR (CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS) Section 105.3
Place of filing; Presidential candidates and their principal campaign
committees (2 U.S.C. 432(g)(4).
All designations, statements, reports, and notices, as well as any
modifications(s) or amendments(s) thereto, required to be filed
under 11 CFR parts 101, 102 and 104 by a candidate for nomination
for election or election to the office of President or Vice President
of the United States or by his or her principal campaign committee
shall be filed in ORIGINAL FORM with the FEDERAL ELECTION
COMMISSION.
11 CFR (Code of Federal Regulations) Chapter 1, Subchapter A
Section 111.4
COMPLAINTS
[2 U.S.C. Section 437g(a)(1)]
(a) Any person who believes that a violation of any statute or
regulation over which the Commission has jurisdiction has occurred
or is about to occur may file a complaint in writing to the
General Counsel, Federal Election Commission, 999 E Street,
NW., Washington, DC 20463. If possible, three (3) copies
should be submitted.
(b) A complaint shall comply with the following:
(1) It shall provide the full name and address of the complainant ; and
(2) The contents of the complaint shall be sworn to and signed in the
presence of a notary public and shall be notarized.
The Federal Election Commission oversees all the money spent
in campaigns for federal office.
11 CFR Ch. 1 Part 101 Section 101.2 CANDIDATE AS AGENT
OF AUTHORIZED COMMITEE [2 U.S.C. Section 432(e)(2)]
QUESTION: BECAUSE THE CANDIDATE IS THE AUTHORIZED
AGENT OF THE COMMITTEE, THEN, THEREFORE,
SHOULD
THE DUTIES OF THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
INCLUDE DETERMINING IF EACH CANDIDATE FOR
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES IS IN FACT A
NATURAL BORN CITIZEN by providing their original
long form birth certificate?
11 CFR (Code of Federal Regulations) Ch. 1, Subchapter B
Part 200
PETITIONS FOR RULEMAKING
11 CFR Ch.1, SubCh. B, Section 200.2 PROCEDURAL
REQUIREMENTS
(a) ANY INTERESTED PERSON MAY FILE WITH THE COMMISSION
A WRITTEN PETITION FOR THE ISSUANCE, AMENDMENT, OR
REPEAL OF A RULE IMPLEMENTING ANY OF THE FOLLOWING
STATUTES:
(1) The Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended, 2 U.S.C. 431 et seq.;
(2) The Presidential Election Campaign Fund Act, as amended, 26 U.S.C. 9001 et seq.;
(3) The Presidential Primary Matching Payment Account Act, as amended, 26 U.S.C. 9031
et seq.;
(4) The Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552; or
(5) Any other law that the Commission is required to implement and administer,
(b) THE PETITION SHALL
(1) Include the name and address of the Petitioner or Agent. An Authorized
Agent of the Petitioner may submit the Petition, but the Agent shall disclose
the identitify of this or her principal;
(2) Identify itself as a PETITION for the ISSUANCE, AMENDMENT, OR REPEAL of a rule;
(3) Identify the specific section(s) of the regulations to be affected;
(4) Set forth the factual and legal grounds on which the petitioner relies,
in support of the proposed action; and
(5) Be addressed and submitted to the
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL,
999 E STREET, NW., WASHINGTON, DC 20463.
(c) The petition may include draft regulatory language that would effectuate
the petitionser's proposal.
(d) The Commission may, in its discretion, treat a document that fails to
conform to the format requirements of paragraph (b) of this section as a basis for a
sua sponte rulemaking. For example, the Commission may consider whether to
intitiate a rulemaking project addressing issues raised in an advisory opinion request
submitted under 11 CFR 112.1 or in a complaint filed under 11 CFR 111.4. However, the
Commission need not follow the procedures of 11 CFR 200.3 in these instances.
Ms. Cris Ericson may be reached at http://crisericson.com
CRIS ERICSON
2010 VOTE CRIS ERICSON
SEE TITLE 18 Section 1001 below: DOES THIS
GIVE LAWYERS A LICENSE TO LIE?
FEDERAL ELECTION CAMPAIGN LAWS
Compiled by
THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
APPENDIX
TITLE 18 UNITED STATES CODE
CRIMES and CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
18 U.S.C. Section 1001
Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any
matter within the jurisidiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial
branch of the Government of the United States knowingly and willfully
(1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme or device a
material fact;
(2) makes any materially false, ficticious, or fraudulent
statement or representation; or
(3) makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the
same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent
statement or entry;
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than
5 years or both.
(b) Subsection (a) does not apply to a party to a judicial proceeding,
or that party's counsel, for statements, representations, writings
or documents submitted by such party or counsel to a judge or
magistrate in that proceeding...
IS THIS A LICENSE FOR LAWYERS TO LIE?
http://www.uscode.house.gov/search/criteria.shtml
in the Title box write 18
in the Search box write 1001
Submitted by Ms. Cris Ericson
CRIS ERICSON
Dear Terri,
I see a way to get Obama’s birth certificate from the State of Hawaii. Follow my logic…
and follow the rules…
1. §338-18 (b) (9) - You must have established by an order of a court of competent jurisdiction - the right to obtain or inspect the certified copy of the record.
This means - You have to go through the court system!
2. §338-18 (b) - You must show a direct AND tangible interest in the record.
(I’ll attempt to tackle the “direct” part, you figure the “tangible” end of it).
My reasoning in tackling #2 above is that our “direct” interest has already been established by the “owner of record,” BHO himself.
By BHO POSTING his Birth Certificate on the internet, BHO has already made his Birth Certificate a matter of public interest and public information.
BHO himself or through his agents, (his campaign), posting publicly his vital record (on his website), is establishing a direct and a public consent to interest in his own vital record. He has therefore expressed by his own actions or through his campaign's actions, or the actions of his other agents, that they are his wishes for the American People and the public at large - that (yes, my records are of public interest, you the public may see my Birth Certificate and here it is, and yes…you all have a direct interest and that’s why I, BHO, have posted my Birth Certificate on my website).
Otherwise - why would any man, in their right mind - post their birth certificate on the internet for all to see?
Unless, he, BHO, felt that we the People of the USA - have a right, and a direct interest in verifying his vital record.
I think that a lot of lawyers are knocking on a door that’s already open.
Thank you,
Edgar
Post a Comment