Thursday, July 30, 2009
(If so, it might get moved down to the "Selection of Sites..." blogroll. "Always be prepared.")
Wednesday, July 29, 2009
Should he not then show what he was sent? Is that not what television journalism is for? I mean it has that big screen, television, even in high-definition, now. Or is that just so we can have a good look at whatever scantily clad women O'Reilly and FoxNews can rationalize coming up with, so they can lust down their corporate nose at them?
Why don't you ask him with me?
Dear Mr. O'Reilly,Name and town, name and town, name and town....
Please show the documents you say prove that Obama was born in Hawaii.
Meanwhile, please note that Hawaiian birth certificates were given to those born elsewhere -- even it would seem, Obama's sister. Does what you have name the hospital and doctor?
Maybe he should throw in Article 2 and John Jay's letter, too.
My better idea is to wait and post it, I hope, in just a day or three with maybe four or five paragraphs worth of commentary. Trusting it will be worth the wait, thank you.
To that, I.O. would welcome the further research of others, showing the deep Marxist, Luo-Kenyan connections which I believe are there to be revealed between the the Obamas and the Odingas -- and to whatever other Marxists and associated evildoers in the rootworks.
Dear editors of American Thinker,
I had known the American Thinker to be a site which is careful to require validation and citation, by its contributors. However, today, I came across "The Political Alchemy of Birtherism" by Joel B. Pollack.
In a manner consistent with propagandist sophistry, Mr. Pollack does indeed present historical citations -- of many sorts of tidbits except for the fundamental assertion of his argument: that Barack Obama's "American birth is a fact." (Well, then he hedges and writes that any contrary claim is "almost certainly false.") But, unfortunately, Mr. Pollack does not examine the evidences.
I would ask Mr. Pollack to cite in the U.S. Constitution where a Commander in Chief must "almost certainly" be a natural born Citizen. I see that he is a "Harvard Law graduate" and a self described speech writer (Pollack, I mean, not Obama). Perhaps he is familiar with the kind of political machination with which he would label (and perhaps "almost" libel) the movement for constitutional adherence regarding presidential eligibility, but he shows no actual familiarity with the central subject matter of his doughnut shaped essay.
As Mr. Pollack digresses about his views of political strategy, let us instead return to the law he purportedly studied. Let us focus upon the investigation of an apparent president's behavior regarding... the law. In the event that a man may be a multiple offender, those who would have him brought to justice as necessary should not ignore his full set of offenses -- especially the ones which may be immediately, legally addressed.
I expect better from "The American Thinker." What can be done, to make up for this?
PS: Mr. Pollack (and you) should realize that if legally valid evidence were found that Obama was born in America, it would not positively present him him eligible for the presidency, due to his apparent failure to meet the "natural born Citizen" requirement of the Constitution, that because of his naturally imputed foreign birth-citizenship, via his father.
Didn't even mention the required renunciation of citizenship foreign to Indonesia, in order to claim citizenship as an adult -- nor the potential falsification of other documents (including electoral eligibility and selective service, plus the alleged 'Certificate of Live Birth' shown by Obama's own arm of compliant propagandists, "factcheck.org").
Now, who out there emailed him with this stuff?
Maybe with an article or two from the top of the I.O. Sidebar?
That is critically important, top-flight activism, for the moment.
Tuesday, July 28, 2009
Looking through a glass, darkly, at AKA Obama’s Birth CertificateAnd, about the apparently fictitious quote of Janice Okubo by the CNN boss
The latest announcement from Hawaiian Officials isn't any more help than their original announcement. Today this was released:
“I, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, director of the Hawaii State Department of Health, have seen the original vital records maintained on file by the Hawaii State Department of Health verifying Barrack Hussein Obama was born in Hawaii and is a natural-born American citizen. I have nothing further to add to this statement or my original statement issued in October 2008 over eight months ago….”
I don’t doubt that Dr. Fukino is accurately reporting that the document she saw says that AKA Obama was indeed born in Hawaii.
Laws of the Territory of Hawaii ACT 96 To Provide For The Issuance Of Certificates Of Hawaiian Birth was in effect from 1911 until 1972 and allowed someone who was born outside the Hawaiian Islands to be registered as though he were born in Hawaii. Under that law, someone simply would have presented herself to the Hawaiian authorities and declared that the child was born in Hawaii. The person could have sworn under oath and presented witnesses and other evidence. If the authorities accepted it, that was the end of it. All a person had to do was file a false statement and Hawaii took them at their word.
One could not just say "My kid was born in Des Moines but I want him to have a Hawaiian birth record". But if you lied no investigation was conducted to validate your claim and the Hawaiian birth record was issued no questions asked.
Knowledge of this practice was wide spread and there are probably thousands of people who obtained Hawaiian birth records between 1911 and 1972 through the process of affidavits and witnesses rather than hospitals and delivery doctors.
The only way to know where AKA OBAMA was actually born is to view AKA OBAMA's original birth certificate on file in Hawaii to see what kind of birth certificate it is, and to examine what corroborating evidence supports what it says about AKA OBAMA's alleged place of birth. If the birth was in a hospital, as AKA OBAMA has maintained, such evidence would be the name of the hospital and the name and signature of the doctor who delivered him.
Excerpt from: http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2009/04/aka-obama-fans-all-together-now-say-omg.html
Here is the information on Hawaiian law that makes it clear why we will never know the truth until we see the actual birth certificate.
"We don't destroy records." - Hawaii DOHI.O. would remind the reader that if a birth certificate were found indicating that Barack Hussein Obama I is the father of Barack Hussein Obama II, wherever the location of his birth, that would merely serve as evidence of the latter's ineligibility to serve as Commander in Chief, due to his Kenyan/UK citizenship, passed along at birth, from the former.
CNN wrong once again – birth record not destroyed – Hawaii contradicts network boss' claim that Obama certificate no longer exists
By Jerome R. Corsi© 2009 WorldNetDaily
CNN's Jon KleinDirectly contradicting CNN chief Jon Klein – who ordered host Lou Dobbs to quit discussing President Obama's birth certificate – the Hawaii Department of Health affirmed that no paper birth certificates were destroyed when the department moved to electronic record-keeping.
"I am not aware of any birth certificate records that have been destroyed by the department," Janice Okubo, public information officer for the Hawaii DOH, told WND. "When the department went electronic in 2001, vital records, whether in paper form or any other form, [were] maintained. We don't destroy records."
See "The Donofrio 'Natural Born Citizen' Challenge."
Monday, July 27, 2009
Join us for Bogus Barry's Birthday Bash!
~ 9-11pm ET & archived
Celebrate with us, as we tell the Mysterious, Marxist Life Story of Barack the Destroyer...
Listen to archived program at Sentinel Radio's Blogtalkradio site
Call in number, for questions and comments during program: 646-727-2652
"This Is Your Life," Barack Obama - Part 1
- What do we know about his grandparents?
- Who's your daddy, Barack? (Shucks, who's your mommy, really?)
- You wrote Dreams from My Father, so what were your father's (Marxist) dreams that you gained from him?
- Where were you born?
- Who brought you up and how?
- What is your reason for being?
PLUS, some time in the 2nd hour: He sure couldn't and obviously didn't do this himself...
What is the real Obama Conspiracy? - Part 1
Edit: Well, just a bit of that, as it turned out, since we also had an extended Eligibility Update with Sam Sewell and caller, Peggy. Review facts, hear things learned since election time, and speculate a bit with us, for further discovery. The story must be told.
Saturday, July 25, 2009
Friday, July 24, 2009
The Obama eligibility crisis has begun to break into "major" media.
Crisis? It really presents a part of the solution to this global fascist insurrection to "level off" America and to control it, along with the rest of the world. The constitutional outing and ouster of Obama will be increasingly seen as just that, by more and more Americans, in government and out.
Lately, we have had eligibility discussed through venues such as:
Lou Dobbs, on radio
CNN: Katie Pilgrim
CNN: Larry King, showing the town hall confrontation of Rep. Michael Castle (R-DE) and asking Elizabeth Cheney about Obama eligibility:
WordNetDaily 2 of 2, today
And now, for videophiles who would like to know more (and I sure hope they cover the most pertinent issue of the Kenyan/U.K. citizenship at birth, via BHO-I) WorldNetDaily is offering a video:
Maybe I can help to put this into perspective in another paragraph or two, in RenewAmerica.us, Sentinel Radio Blog, and Fort Hard Knox. This I.O. post may see some updating, as well.
Rep. Darrell Issa Calls for Freeze of the $8,500,000,000.00, of Our Money, for Stimulating Neo-Marxist ACORN, Plus Congressional Investigation
Beginning excerpt lifted from their site.
The criminal case against ACORN
Congressional report demands probe, block of $8.5 billion in stimulus funds
Posted: July 24, 2009
12:00 am Eastern
By Jerome R. Corsi
© 2009 WorldNetDaily
In a move to block designation of $8.5 billion in economic stimulus funds, Republicans on a House committee released a report calling for a criminal investigation of ACORN, the community activist group tied to numerous charges of voter fraud nationwide.
The 88-page report asks whether ACORN, the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, is intentionally structured as a criminal enterprise.
Commissioned by Rep. Darrell Issa of California, the ranking Republican on the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, the report charges ACORN "hides behind a paper wall of nonprofit corporate protections to conceal a criminal conspiracy on the part of its directors, to launder federal money in order to pursue a partisan political agenda and to manipulate the American electorate."
The report expresses concern that ACORN would channel $8.5 billion in economic stimulus funds through a criminal corporate structure designed to mask the distribution of public money to partisan activities, including voter fraud to advance the campaigns of radical Democratic politicians.
It will be interesting to see what happens in Congress and in the Marxstream media. "Interesting" as in the Chinese curse, "May you live in interesting times."
Thursday, July 23, 2009
I am listening to Rush, interviewed by Greta Van Sustern tonight. I.O. may or may not be able to link to it on the 'net. Neither Mr. Limbaugh nor the rest of us may yet understand exactly who is and is not a part of this global conspiracy, nor just how they are all involved, but we are all learning.
Edit: Mr. Limbaugh will be featured again on Ms. Van Sustern's program, Friday night, 2/24.
Wednesday, July 22, 2009
I.O. would relate that while Manning refers to "white" people and "black" people, this is only about white in the way it is about blue and red -- this is about black and white, yes: the black ink of truth upon the white pages of God's history for America and the world.
God has an agenda, o reader. Barack Obama and the conspirators behind him, in the shadow of America, are His foils. Let us pay attention to the former as we deal with the latter.
h/t: one James or another
Honorable Robert M. Gates,
Enough is enough! You must be aware at this point of the tempest brewing among the Rank and File. I am writing you in an effort to appeal to your sense of concern for the Military; a concern we share not only for the Military as a whole but for each and every individual who wears the Uniform in the Service of our Country. I am in this regard specifically asking you for your help. I implore you to not wait until the “pot boils over” and we find ourselves in total disarray.
I am convinced, beyond any doubt, that the moral well being and efficiency of our fighting forces to defend our Country is soon to be hanging in a precarious balance if not already. In my humble estimation this is NOT a theoretical possibility to construct a thesis or a contingency plan about. It is a reality and is happening right now. Resolution of this issue must be accomplished in the most expeditious manner available at your disposal to gain immediate relief to those of us who are struggling to fully comply with our sworn Oath to the Constitution while being conflicted by questions relating to the qualifications of the POTUS to hold the office in full and absolute compliance with the Natural Born Citizen Clause.
Regardless of differences in the color of our uniforms, the color of our skin, religion or gender WE are Brothers and Sisters in Arms and our family is being torn apart. Are you not looking and listening to what is happening around you? How can anyone of good conscious stand by and let this happen to us? I for one cannot! You must care enough to intercede to stop this. Is this not within your power to do so? Why have you not acted already? What is it that you are waiting for?
If you have any doubts of what I am saying is true you need look no further than the comments made on the Military.com site regarding the actions of Lt. Scott Easterling who in my opinion is an absolutely courageous young Army Officer. Irrespective of your personal opinion of his actions, one thing is abundantly clear; the horrible, hateful and demeaning things that were being said about him and one to the other among my Brothers and Sisters in Arms were things that I have NEVER experienced in ALL my years of military service. It is no less than gut retching to see this happening. The wounds that are being inflicted will NOT be healed by any Medicine I have at my disposal. There is nothing I learned in Medical School or in my training as a Flight Surgeon that can fix this; save the absolute power of Truth. The POTUS must stop concealing the documents once and for all and the issue of his qualifications must be addressed. Make no mistake; any adverse consequences to the troops as a result of your failure to act responsibly will be in large part directly on your head.
Have you considered the legal ramifications for our fighting forces if for any reason the POTUS is not qualified. Are they in Iraq illegally? If so does this make them terrorists under International law as the Islamic radical elements have been calling them? Have they given up their Geneva protections and do not even know this? If so when captured can they be killed or tortured without International legal ramifications? Have they been stripped of the legal protections by the Soldiers and Sailors Civil Relief act? Are you willing to allow this risk to them when they are fighting for us?
Once again I find myself at a loss of words to try to explain the abject and total dismay I have at the administration to include the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court to allow the painful division now occurring in our military to proceed unabated. I hope that [I] do not need to remind you that you as well took an Oath to support and defend the Constitution. As a point of honor you are either willing to do this or you are not. If you are not then preserve your honor, resign and let someone who cares more about us than that do what is right.
I again respectfully implore you to act within your powers and help us. It is absolutely true and is my Prayer to my Creator to allow me to suffer the slings and arrows of being thought a fool rather than to have my convictions realized that persons of responsibility have allowed through negligence to have the Office of the President of the United States to be USURPED; it is self evident however, that whatever the outcome we must know the truth.
Lt Col David A. Earl-Graef USAFR MC
Monday, July 20, 2009
You see, Ruth Bader Ginsberg recently showed a lapse of the usual "Progressivist" deceit, a rare glimpse of honesty: that a primary reason for abortion in the United States is to reduce the population's "undesirables." However, if one examines Marxist, Social Darwinist ideological tradition, she is simply marching in step with her historic and contemporary comrades (see American and British "Progressivism" and German Nazism).
The reader may know that Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood, was a racist eugenicist, celebrated by fellow "Progressives" and Ku Klux Klan alike. Planned Parenthood, to this date, markets their child murder inordinately into areas of the country where African-Americans are most prodigious. (See blackgenocide.org.)
It has been noted that Barack Obama, who has given us the Supreme Court nomination of Sonia Sotomayor (for whom Ginsburg has flaunted Court propriety by her public campaigning) has slaveholders in his lineage, but no known slaves, ironically enough. The virulent ideological strain, Marxism has also been found in his parentage, subsequently in his nurturing, training, political career development, and in his own words, methods, and now his White House transgressions. Accordingly, he has been a very aggressive champion of Planned Parenthood and abortion.
It should not come as a surprise that the Obama/Pelosi "Progressive" plan for "healthcare" includes measures which increasingly fund abortion by means of our confiscated tax dollars, plus measures which would curtail medical treatment of the elderly and those most dependent upon our care. Do you recall how Obama stated hypothetically, that a baby would be punishment for his daughter? How he said his chief mistake in the Senate was failing to fight Congress' attempt to provide due process, for the right to life, of Terri Schiavo? And do you recall how Obama handled his grandmother, as she neared her death?
A certain pointed word is redacted a bit, below, otherwise Mr. Donofrio's posting is represented intact.
Ginsberg Espousing Master Race Eugenics?One surmises the road to Hell will be smoothed by the feet of good "Progressives." Whatever avenue is taken, we need to get them out of America's way.
Pardon my leaving the NBC issue aside for now. Too much strange stuff flying around and I don’t really know what to make of it. I feel like a scene is being set – a dinner table if you will – and the meal is going to be a “long form” BC for your culinary delight. It just feels like a set up – all this long form – long form – long form — blah blah blah. That’s the standard being established for absolute eligibility.
It’s being allowed people. Just my opinion. But you have to be a complete lemming if you think Gibbs is now regularly calling on Les Kinsolving of WND in White House pressers just to be a fair dude. The administration appears to be controlling this game and leading it to an endgame where they give you EXACTLY what you’re all asking for. Notice the standard wording Major Cooke stated to the press – “All he has to do is show the long form BC…” etc. If that’s all he has to do to drive a stake through the heart of the eligibility issue… then that’s what you can expect. But I digress from my topic today.
I tell you… nothing felt more intellectually dirty or reeked of pure filth to me than my experience with the United States Supreme Court. I know the law. I know procedure. I knew the SCOTUS court rules. Yet, I had to be deloused after that experience. God knows what crawls in those chambers. Go back through SCOTUS history and see the vile possession by evil of those once hallowed chambers by eugenic skank like Oliver Wendell Holmes and his modern successors.
Eugenics is basically what Hitler’s Nazi regime worshipped via their final solution. It’s a concept of population control where the Government decides who can live and who can breed… and who cannot be allowed to breed.
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg is Jewish and one would think that she might find such a concept repulsive. But the abortion rights movement heralded by the BS decision in Roe v. Wade is more about eugenics then it is about a woman’s right to choose. And on July 7, 2009 Ginsburg confirmed what many suspected of her – that she’s a eugenic proliferating skank.
Check her comment given to the New York Times:
Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of.
What populations are you speaking of you horn rimmed freak show? There’s not much else I can say about this crap except that the New York Times journalist – Emily Bazelon – failed to do her damn job and follow up on the alarming answer given by Ginsburg.
I got news for you Ginsburg, your s**t stinks bad, just as the s**t emanating from every other race. All s**t stinks. Yours isn’t pretty. It doesn’t taste good. It doesn’t smell like roses. Your s**t stinks, girl. I know that might be hard for you to accept, but I suggest getting your nose all up in it sometime and have a wake up call.
Who breeds and who doesn’t isn’t up to you and it never will be. You’ve already lost. Home is calling. He’s waiting for you. Got the sauna ready… and the air conditioning unit is permanently broken. Word.
Edit, 7/21: The reader may wish to observe the Center for Bio-Ethical Reform and blackgenocide.org visit of the NAACP convention, article in Jill Stanek's blog. (The NAACP was begun by Marxists/Progressives, while the Urban League was begun by believers in American principles.) Also, from the anonymous comment, see: maafa21.com for further information on the racism of the "Progressives."
Sunday, July 19, 2009
Do not listen to doom and gloom. This is not the end of the world -- and it does not have to be the end of America. (And Barack Obama is not nearly talented enough to be the antichrist.) God's plans are carried to completion.
Pray and work, for the acceptance of the Way, Truth, and Life, and a return to American principles; to the freedom brought by continuous fulfillment of the responsibilities of the Sovereign People.
That is the way of God, for the remnant who "believes that He is, and that He is a rewarder of those who diligently seek Him." (Hebrews 11:6)
"But you, O Israel, my servant, Jacob, whom I have chosen, you descendants of Abraham my friend,
I took you from the ends of the earth, from its farthest corners I called you. I said, 'You are my servant'; I have chosen you and have not rejected you.
So do not fear, for I am with you; do not be dismayed, for I am your God. I will strengthen you and help you; I will uphold you with my righteous right hand.
"All who rage against you will surely be ashamed and disgraced; those who oppose you will be as nothing and perish.
Though you search for your enemies, you will not find them. Those who wage war against you will be as nothing at all.
For I am the LORD, your God, who takes hold of your right hand and says to you, Do not fear; I will help you.
Saturday, July 18, 2009
protests -- riots -- even food riots -- accelerated decline of America -- fascism, according to Mussolini's criteria -- tent cities -- ghost malls -- widespread strikes -- boss-nappings -- gang warfare -- when peple lose everything, they 'lose it' -- abandonment of the dollar, internationally -- "too big to fail" is baloney [I.O.: not baloney if one understands what the Marxofascists mean, i.e., too big to pass up the opportunity to control] -- monopolies are killing Main Street [I.O.: this is a two-by-four over the head of both the liberal Obama-Pelosi supporting "useful idiots" and pseudoconservative, 100% laissez-faire, Libertarian absolutists]
a two-headed, one-party system -- but Obama accelerates with his takeovers, etc. -- "Cap and Trade" is bogus -- bankrupting the country -- America will never be able to pay back its debt -- farmer rebellions -- mob rule and terrorMr. Celente gets it as to the outward aspects of what is going on (and I.O. is adding his blog to our Obamologist blogroll).
Do you think he is beginning to understand the intentionality involved?
- Frances Fox Piven, et. al.
Friday, July 17, 2009
By Rob Lamb
Admiral Michael Mullen, CJCS
General James E Cartwright USMC, VCJCS
General George W. Casey, Jr. USA
Admiral Gary Roughead, USN
General Norton A. Schwartz, USAF
General James T. Conway, USMC
We are now in a situation where those who desire to extricate themselves from the War On Terror, or any other military obligation, may do so by challenging their orders. All one needs to do is question the legitimacy of the alleged president, Soetoro, and they are immediately released. What will you do if all the military want to know the truth? What will you do then? Should not they expect their orders to be legal? Every person in the military should resist, barring absolute proof. If only our military had hundreds of thousands of others with Major Stefan Frederick Cook’s bravery.
Show us, gentlemen, that you, too, have that bravery. Show the American People that you are not just armchair generals, fat and incompetent, happy to collect your paychecks, waiting to retire. Show us that you indeed have some testicular fortitude and the ‘guts’ for which our military is known. Show us you give a damn.
You cannot allow this wound to fester. It is Soetoro, at the top, who must prove himself. Not the other way around. With every damn ‘i’ dotted, and ‘t’ crossed; all the way back to August 4, 1961, from Kenya, to Hawaii, to Indonesia, the passports, the Selective Service application, through school. All of it. ALL OF IT.
The American People cannot depend on Robert Gates. He has licked every boot he ever encountered, for administrations reaching back to when he first joined the CIA. Suckling at the government teat for one’s entire adult life tends to alter the ego, mettle, and judgment. He is worthless.
At one time, there were hopes for Colin Powell. I cannot believe I wrote, begging McCain to put him on the ticket, as V.P., last fall. It turns out he is merely a sycophantic racist; one who now has regrets, or ‘concerns‘. As if that will help this country now. That moron helped put the U.S. on the road to hell.
Congress, for the most part, is nothing but a miserable pathetic collection of spineless, weak political slugs of the lowest order. They thrive only in their own sewage, secreting their vile mucus in every direction, politically apophallating each other. Possibly you can discern my measurement of Congress’ usefulness.
To keep this drip from becoming a torrent, you must demand that Soetoro prove his legitimacy, once and for all. First, he should be a citizen of the United States, incredibly, even that is questionable. But, to be president, he must have two citizen parents. He can be given the benefit of the doubt on the other two requirements. World leaders and intelligence agencies know he is a fraud. Foreign populations have been informed by their media, and know him to be a fraud. Our own CIA and FBI know he is a fraud. Millions of Americans know he is a fraud. Major Cook knows he is a fraud. I’m of the opinion you gentlemen also know he is a fraud.
Honduras. Could this tiny, poor, third world DEMOCRACY be a model for the United States of America? I can’t believe I just wrote that down. Yet that country was not going to allow a president usurp power he did not constitutionally possess, as we have. The Honduran Army was forced to step in and correct the situation, and immediately turn over the reins of power to legitimate officeholders. Their military were true leaders. A coups? No. A correction.
You could achieve the same thing by demanding honesty, truth, and transparency of Soetoro. Demand his bona fides. Prove to the American People that you are leaders. Prove to the American People that you are patriots worthy of the medals on your chests. Or return them as undeserved.
We learn, today, that DOD’s Defense Security Services Agency has demanded that Simtech CEO, Larry Grice, terminate Major Stefan Frederick Cook, and that his security clearances have been revoked. Despicable mistreatment of a true hero. What about the very idea that the military must follow legal orders? How the hell do they know the orders are legal if they don’t ask? Doesn’t this violate the whistle blower protections afforded anybody who works for the government? Yes, soldiers who work for the military, work for the government.
This hero, Major Cook, swore to uphold the Constitution, not a phony president. For doing his job, for protecting the Constitution, he is felled, as if by an enemy bullet, but it turns out to be friendly fire. The despicable coward who ordered this treatment of him should be hanged. By destroying Cook, an illegal order is executed; exactly what Cook was trying to avoid.
He is the hero, the patriot, you gentlemen will never be.
Yours very truly,
cc: Major Stefan Frederick Cook, Dr. Orly Taitz, the press, Pelosi, Reid, McCain, McConnell, Gates, Powell, Members of the House and Senate Armed Services Committees, Soetoro.
The views and statements expressed by Investigating Obama contributors, and in quotations and citations, are their own and do not necessarily reflect the position of Investigating Obama and Arlen Williams.
Thursday, July 16, 2009
Bombshell: Prominent Attorney Accuses Sotomayor of Possible Ethics BreachAnd do you know of Bill Gates making worldwide plans for you, with George Soros, David Rockefeller, Ted Turner, Oprah Winfrey, Warren Buffett, and Michael Bloomberg?
Thursday, July | Kristinn
Posted on Thursday, July 16, 2009 4:26:31 PM by kristinn
The following letter was confirmed to me by Mr. Greenberg with the following statement:
"The letter was sent to Senators Sessions, Hatch, Grassley, Graham and Coburn. It was also sent to Cong. Peter King (R) NY. The story is being covered extensively by the photo blogs, the trade publications and the NY Times. No politician has responded. The NY Times quotes attributed to me are accurate and therefore I assume that the quotes of my adversary Mr. Fairhurst are accurate as well."
Text of the letter:
I am an attorney in NYC who represented White House Photographer Chris Usher in litigation against Corbis, a privately held company wholly owned by Bill Gates. The case principally concerned lost Presidential and campaign photography during the 2000 Bush v. Gore Campaign and the US Supreme Court case related thereto.We won at the trial level in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York but the award to the victorious plaintiff was absurdly low.
We appealed to the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals where the award was inexplicably upheld. The New York Times reported on this high profile case today, please see:
It was revealed therein by opposing counsel hat Judge Sotomayor and Mr. Gates’ counsel have known and (possibly worked with) each other for decades. Such relationship was never disclosed to me as plaintiff’s attorney by the Court. No opportunity for us to request that Judge Sotomayor recuse herself was afforded as this information was never disclosed.
The appearance of impropriety is astounding as Judge Sotomayor could have recused herself and we could have had another Appeals Panel within days.
Please contact me so that this apparently unethical judicial behavior is brought to the attention of the judiciary committee immediately.Edward C. Greenberg, Esq.
contact info redacted
You see, they want to control the population. No, really "control the population." Read about that, here.
WorldNetDaily explains in their May 24, 2009 report, "The meeting at the home of Sir Paul Nurse, a British Nobel Prize-winning biochemist and president of Rockefeller University, was the inspiration of Gates and took place three weeks ago."
No, really... a biochemist, who heads up Rockefeller University and wants to work with fellow globalist manipulators to control the population.
For at least a few days, this interview should be streamable via this link.I.O. plans to publish a few comments about Keyes vs. Obama (California) and the case of the apparently persecuted Major Cook (Georgia) in a bit.
Contrast this with Barry the Bomber's hesitance to do anything to offend fellow autocrats in Iran. What does one expect, from one who is also a dedicated campaigner for Marxist and Islamofascist collaborator, Raila Odinga, in Kenya?
Tuesday, July 14, 2009
I.O. will comment (and its administrator, pray) but will likely not be a primary news source, for this. Then again, we may pick our spots, for expanded usurper-news.
Saturday, July 4, 2009
When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.
He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
The beginning of the Declaration of Independence, submitted at what may be the beginning of the end of the United States of America that it charters