Well, here is a quaint, little item. Who got the story, besides CBS News? I failed to find anyone else coming up quickly, on search results pages. Was CBS News believed to be especially sensitive about a subject such as this, by the Obama machinery?
Jan. 13, 2009 (CBS) President-elect Barack Obama will visit the Supreme Court tomorrow, according to his transition office, reports CBS News correspondent Steve Chaggaris.I might have excerpted the story in case CBS is unappreciative of fair use doctrine, but it is so brief that excerpting becomes difficult. More here, after I do a bit of searching: "Steve Chaggaris"
At the invitation of Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., Mr. Obama and Vice President-elect Joe Biden will pay a protocol visit to the Supreme Court of the United States Wednesday afternoon, the office says.
This will mark the third time in recent history a president-elect and vice resident-elect have visited the court. The last such visit was made by Bill Clinton and Al Gore on Dec. 8, 1992.
On Nov. 19, 1980, Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush made the same visit.
Mr. Obama and Biden will visit with the justices in the ceremonial West Conference Room.
The visit is private; reporters and photographers will not be present.
Searching in the CBS News site done: Steve Chaggaris is "CBS News Political Director." As in directing viewers and readers, politically, via CBS News? Sounds rather like good ol' Dan, if so. And as I gather, his latest stories have been all about telling us how important Barack Obama is, as he embarks upon the salvation of the presidency at this historically critical time. Well, except that his immediately prior article is entitled, "Michelle Obama Picks White House Decorator." Obviously, a tough, critical newsman, in the post-WWII CBS mold.
Edward R. Mur--I mean Mr. Chaggaris seems to have an ear to the lips of the Obama ascendancy.
And, how do you think the conversation will go, between Bogus POTUS - Bogus Elect Obama and Chief Justice Roberts?
Good day, Mr. President-Elect.Alas, we will have to guess how it really goes/went. "The visit is private; reporters and photographers will not be present." Then again, we simple Sovereign Citizens are used to just having to guess about all this.
Why, good day to you, Chief Justice Roberts; um... uh... so! Read any letters from Orly Taitz, lately?
Well, Barry-er may I call you, "Barack?" No, I'm sorry, too informal. You see, Mr. President-Elect Soeto-oh-oh-Obama, I've been hearing the darnedest things about you! Please, have a seat and tell me a little about yourself. Begin at the v-e-r-r-y beginning, if you can -- that's the natural place to start, eh? I mean, wherever that place happens... to be.
Arlen, I.O., Awakening in Twitter
Arlen, I.O., Awakening: Facebook
31 comments:
LOL!
Wonder why President Bush never visited?
Never mind, I know. He was likely (and rightfully) frightened away, envisioning press accusations of Supreme Court tampering. Of course Obama need not be.
Well, Jill, you know his staff have been reading up on FDR....
FDR: Fascist Democracy Redux?
I like the Bogus POTUS title. Suits Obama well.. and it rhymes!
What the hell kind of country is this? We have 25+ suits going on and the Chief Justice invites him down for tea while the MSM is in lalaland.
Unbelievable!
They try way too hard to make everything appear "normal".
It's was his transition team that leak the story! But did you notice how it was worded? It's a protocol visit to the Supreme Court, making it sound like it's not a big deal! Why? To cover up the real story. I strongly believe that the time has come that The Supreme Court cannot ingorned this Consitution crisis any longer, the American people have spoken very loudly and they are obilgated to uphold the Constitution! So lets be very optimistic because truth always prevails! and it always has a way to make even the wise(Obama)look like a fool!
The Supreme Court is now contaminated by a visit from the lying criminal traitor Obamanation. He leaves his disgusting dirty finger and pawprints everywhere. I can't believe they briefed a traitor who's not even a citizen of this great country on matters of national security-----and now the Supreme Court lets his non-citizenship issue ride. That court ain't looking so SUPREME anymore.......
How long will we have to be humiliated by this non-citizen traitor Obama holding the highest office of this once great country? How many more countries besides Kenya will file a complaint with the State Department for his treasonous activities? How many more mobsters and Chicago-kickback-buddies will be arrested and he slides away? DISGUSTING LYING CRIMINAL TRAITOR OBAMA
I think that the Supreme Court will let Obama be seated as president. There is no desire to uphold our Consitution. If there was, things would have never gone this far.
I know that if I, and many others, can find so much information about the ineligibility of Obama to hold office, then the Justices could also. This alone says they will trash our Consitution in favor of "The One."
We watched the death of our country on November 4.
Check this out. I read the info below last night. It seams to me that Bogus POTUS is going to be meeting with all of the SC Justices, not just Roberts. I cant help but think there will be some discussion about the US Constitution.
From America’s Right;
http://www.americasright.com/
Article; Newsmax: Obama’s Passport File Breached, Cauterized
Monday, January 12, 2009
Comment Link;
https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=4257885249261850543&postID=5231293953744088264&isPopup=true
Comment;
Sharon2 said...
I copied the Supreme Court story from the Huffington Post, which gave no attribution (as usual). After I submitted my comment, I found the story word for word at CBS.
At the invitation of Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., President-elect Barack Obama and Vice President-elect Joe Biden will pay a protocol visit to the Supreme Court of the United States tomorrow afternoon. This will mark the third time in recent history a President-elect and Vice President-elect have visited the Court. The last such visit was made by Bill Clinton and Al Gore on December 8, 1992. The first visit was on November 19, 1980, when Ronald Reagan and George H. W. Bush called on the Court. The President-elect and Vice President-elect will visit with the Chief Justice and the Associate Justices in the ceremonial West Conference Room where Obama and Biden will sign the same guest book signed by Clinton and Gore in 1992. Following the signing of the guest book, the Chief Justice and the President-elect and Vice President-elect will join the Justices on a brief tour of the Courtroom and the Justices' Conference Room. This is the room where the nine Justices meet in private to decide pending cases. The visit is a private event. There will be no photo or press availabilities.
I put the kids to bed, took a shower, and now, this is how the CBS story reads:
(CBS) President-elect Barack Obama will visit the Supreme Court tomorrow, according to his transition office, reports CBS News correspondent Steve Chaggaris.
At the invitation of Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., Mr. Obama and Vice President-elect Joe Biden will pay a protocol visit to the Supreme Court of the United States Wednesday afternoon, the office says.
This will mark the third time in recent history a president-elect and vice resident-elect have visited the court. The last such visit was made by Bill Clinton and Al Gore on Dec. 8, 1992.
On Nov. 19, 1980, Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush made the same visit.
Mr. Obama and Biden will visit with the justices in the ceremonial West Conference Room.
The visit is private; reporters and photographers will not be present.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/01/13/national/inauguration09/main4720001.shtml
*** Notice some missing info?
January 13, 2009 11:42 PM
This conflict of interest and must be against the law, when the Supreme Court has two open cases to be heard.
This is not right, and it shows our justice system is not different from the one from Venezuela or Cuba if the enjoy today's visit at closed doors.
Hope, I'd imagine it would be tempting to begin to confer a bit in that conference room -- for those justices who have an inkling of intellectually honest interpretation of the Constitution, that is.
Interesting indeed, Pagina.
Prayers, praying that the TRUTH will come into the light for all to see...Amen. :) Thank you for all those who have worked so hard to bring this "secrecy" out. :)
nancy said,america has been sold to the highest bidder , obama won the election with donation from place that hate america , it sad that some american and the supreme court let obama get away with this crime, good help and god bless america
I believe the Justices are giving Obama the chance to back out or resign, rather than being FORCED OUT through a public court hearing when The Court grants one of the lawsuits.
Obama making a public announcement of resignation is more dignified and less stressful for the country than having a long, drawn-out lawsuit to determine the next President of the United States.
I would agree with that, Anonymous.
Makes sense to me.
There have been, what...something like 50+ different administration terms and only 2 have visited SCOTUS like this? That's hardly "protocol" as the CBS report puts it. That's like 4% have done that! And...this was 'At the invitation of Chief Justice Roberts' no less.
Anybody heard about the INS document No. CD E509B TECX SQSQPQ ?
Per the discussion on the blog tonight, the Port of Entry where Stanley Dunham came back into the U.S. was Miami, Florida and it occurred six days after the birth of her child (BHO Jr.) is under this document on or about August 10, 1961 (if Obama's birth is August 4, 1961) and then the registry in Hawaii occurred on August 12, 1961 as shown on the Hawaii birth of records reporth that I believe you have.
Patriot?
"*** Notice some missing info?"
Sure do. The story went from:
"President-elect Barack Obama and Vice President-elect Joe Biden"
to:
"Mr. Obama and Vice President-elect Joe Biden"
The 'President-elect' part has been dropped from how he's addressed.
One must think of the up-side of this whole HOKUS POKUS BOGUS POTUS issue: from now on Americans will be able to vote for any foreign national they want for president; now that NATURAL BORN CITIZEN doesn't matter any longer, we can all vote for Fidel Castro, Putin, Kim, Ahmadinejad(s) or any other non-American to be our duly elected prez... I think I'll vote for Mickey Mouse -- he'll enhance the rest of our Mickey Mouse government, no? --jws
Rally for Our Republic / Vigil for the USA
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2159970/posts
Conservatives and Democratic Voters:
" Come Now, Let us reason together"...need alternatives to Obama / (Biden?)
FreeRepublic.com - Latest Posts
Leo had to get in the fray of things to be hit in the face with the reality that our whole system is corrupt.The rest of the sheeple will soon learn that as well.We are headed for a Fascist NWO in the very near future.Regardless of what transpires with the Usurper,the point of no returm was reached in September.But as usual,the sheeple will make jokes about this and keep grazing and baa baa-ing.
Busted on a technicality. Talk about throwing a wrench into the gears of the Obama machine,this citizenship issue is going to stop this campaign in it's tracks. "Born in Hawaii" what a lie. Arrest these bastards and end this fraud. This is no innocent mistake,this is calculated fraud. Where is the FBI??
As I said in a previous post, "There is no desire to uphold our Consitution. If there was, things would have never gone this far."
If the Supreme Court had any intention of upholding the Consitution, they would have given ear to the pleas presented to them months ago. Obama and the Democrat Party have been given free rein to bastardize the Consitution without so much as a peep of objection from the spineless, lily-livered Republicans. I hold the Republicans most at fault for the destruction of our Country, because they always claim to want to uphold our Consitution first and foremost. The Democrat's actions, on the other hand, come as no surprise as they are Socialists, and feel that it is their given right to be in power. It does not matter how they achieve this, just that it occurs.
All through the campaign and election, time after time, illegalities being perpetuated by the Obama Team were pointed out. Did any elected Republican or News organization raise a stink? NO!
After the election, I have been saying that we have seen our last free election; Now that the Democrats are back in power, they will never risk losing power again. I now present to the people who think I'm nuts for feeling this way - lo and behold:
111th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. J. RES. 5
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to repeal the twenty-second article of amendment, thereby removing the limitation on the number of terms an individual may serve as President.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
January 6, 2009
Mr. SERRANO introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JOINT RESOLUTION
Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to repeal the twenty-second article of amendment, thereby removing the limitation on the number of terms an individual may serve as President.
Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:
`Article--
`The twenty-second article of amendment to the Constitution of the United States is hereby repealed
Co-Sponsors
Sabo Democrat, MN 5th
Pallone Democrat, NJ 6th
Berman Democrat, CA 28th
Sensenbrenner Republican WI 5th
Hoyer Democrat, MD 5th
It's pretty clear that a case being brought to the court doesn't legitimize said case.
It's equally clear that disregard for the constitution has been displayed many times before, and will be again.
But the guy was born in Hawai'i. He has a birth certificate. Period.
Maybe people should focus on the fact that our fourth amendment is being shredded by the supreme court (read http://www.newser.com/story/47923/supreme-court-oks-use-of-illegally-obtained-evidence.html) before they cast frivolous accusations in the form of a formal suit against a decent human being because you don't agree with him.
-Brandon
Brandon, I agree with your last stated sentiment. However, we are discussing Barack Obama.
Brandon, you're an idiot. PERIOD. If you knew anything, you would know that Hawaii "Birth Certificate" means nothing. All it certifies is that Obama's parents lived in Hawaii at least a year. Hawaii had just become a state and a lot of people didn't have birth certificates, so if you could prove residency for a year in Hawaii, they would give your child a Hawaiian birth certificate. That's why the Obama Press made such a big issue over whether the document was a "fake" or not. Like if the document WEREN'T a fake, it would prove Obama was born in Hawaii. If legal, it proves nothing. That's why he needed to release his VAULT copy, because it would show the hospital where he was born and a doctor's signature. Instead of releasing the long copy, he made a big issue over whether this particular document- which means nothing----were original. And by the way, even if he actuallyt were born in Hawaii, he lost his citizenship upon adoption by Lolo Soetoro when he became Barry Soetoro and became an Indonesian citizenship because of dual citizenship laws. This Hawaiian birth certificate "scandal" is just a cover up for his bigger problem-----not really being born in Hawaii even if the document is original- and losing citizenship upon Indonesian adoption. The man is a lying criminal traitor and not even a US citizen. By the way, his Kenyan grandmother has consistantly sworn that she witnessed his birth in a Mombasa Hospital---until he shut her up.
If you are born in America, you are an American. Anyone telling you otherwise is misinformed.
If Mexican immigrants have a child in the U.S., that child is a U.S. citizen regardless of their parents' citizenship, or the citizenship of whoever adopts them, unless they specifically request and have the paperwork done to change the citizenship of the child.
Anybody with a passing familiarity with the law will tell you the same.
It would be a better use of energy to see how to work with your lawmakers to ensure that the things you care about are taken care of, or at least considered, under this administration rather than forcing an issue that has only one outcome, which is for the courts to recognize Barack Obama for the American citizen he is.
-Brandon
P.S. A politician lying is nothing new. Clinton lied about the reasons for using military force. So did Bushes I and II. I'm sure Obama will do the same. Suspiciously, with the military supporting their untruths, warning of death and destruction if we don't violate a sovereign nation's borders, the ones in charge don't get charged with treason very often.
Obviously, Brandon, besides being an idiot, you can't read. The question is "Was Obama born in Kenya and still granted that Hawaiian certificate that means nothing?" and the answer is "Yes, Obama could have been born in Kenya as his grandmother has consistantly sworn and still have gotten that Hawaiian Certificate he released to the public." Note that he hired 3 law firms and spent almost a million dollars on the issue rather than just pay $25 to release the VAULT copy of his birth certificate which would have proven Hawaiian birth. The ridiculous certificate he released proves nothing except that his parents had lived in Hawaii a year. I know the law. If he were born in the US (not AMERICA), he was a dual citizen at birth with both Britain (from British Colonies) and the US. That gets complicated, which I will explain if you need, but there is no doubt that Barry was adopted by Lolo Soetoro in Indonesia- which did NOT allow dual citizenship with the US, and his school records show INDONESIAN CITIZENSHIP---and since Indonesia did NOT allow dual citizenship with the US, and he obviously accepted Indonesian citizenship as only Indonesians can go to public school there---and the laws of the US stated that you must obey the laws of both countries you are a citizen of, then he lose US citizenship upon adoption and taking name Barry Soetoro. His Obama name is not even a legal name. The only way he could have gained US citizenship back was through the Naturalization process- which makes you ineligible for president. Further proof- his 1981 trip to pakistan which FORBID US citizens entrance---further FORBIDDEN by the US----he gained acces by Indonesian citizenship and denied his US citizenship. I could go on.
As to traitorous activity- his campaigning for Odingo in Kenya under the banner "Kenyans want CHANGE" which sounds eerily similar to his US campaign---caused such genocide when Christian women and children were burned alive in churches ---that the Kenyan government filed a complaint with the US STate department for Obama violation the terms of his visa----granted for express purpose of promoting good will beteen Kenya and the US. Mass genocide, burning women and children alive in churches, hacking people to death in the streets is hardly goodwill. Obama is a lying criminal traitor who is not even a US citizen---no possible way he is even legally a citizen----who has committed treason at least twice under the Logan Act. These are qualifications for PRISON, not POTUS
DO SOME RESEARCH
OK, here are a few facts:
Obama was born in Hawaii.
So there goes your first argument.
Second, Bush kinda sorta maybe (definitely) violated all sorts of UN treaties and laws, the most of which being invading a sovereign nation without provocation, and admitting to torturing human beings.
I bring these up despite the fact that they don't have anything to do with Obama because they have everything to do with the argument you're trying to make.
Instead of creating unquantifiable, unprovable accusations and then finding a way to prove them, I am using fact and letting it speak for itself.
To quickly pass over a few arguments about the birth certificate issue n particular:
Nobody has challenged my citizenship, and I don't know where my true birth certificate is. Nobody cares. Unless I run for President. Now it's an issue, and only an issue raised by a very small percentage of people, and nobody in the "established" media, and by virtually nobody in the media who disagrees with Obama.
More than that: Nobody had ever challenged his citizenship before. Ever. For any reason. Until now. And even then the "now" includes a handful of people, such as yourself, who have less than a passing understanding of law, who wish to sound as though you have a grasp on an issue that doesn't exist. The issue that does exist is simple:
You don't want Obama as your president, and you will find any way you can to discount him now, in the future, and after he's retired or died. It doesn't matter what he does while in office, you will always find a theory to expand upon using the internet as an echo chamber, and you will always find enough people to agree with you to make your argument sound legitimate.
But the thing is - and this is true of anything in life - truth isn't consensus, and consensus isn't truth.
Truth is truth.
And the truth of the matter is you would be doing yourself, your state and your country a disservice if you didn't spend as much time trying to make the changes you want to happen a reality as you did floating around the idea that an American citizen is somehow not an American citizen.
-Brandon
Brandon, I agree that torture, "Patriot" Act, domestic spying, military commissions, trashing international treaties etc as perpetrated by the Bush administration are unconstitutional and deserved impeachment. The US Constitution is not pick and choose: we live by and defend it as a whole or it falls. A creeping decadence has been working its way through our political culture for years ("lobbying", "campaign finance," "privatization," whatever) for decades, and its created a slippery slope.
Try another slippery slope: a US Senator who won't (ie can't ?) prove
he's a US citizen promoting legislation that American citizens who draw their first breath by surviving abortion can be carved or ground up before they can prove their claim: that's murder. Who would trust such a peverse individual with any power over their families lives: that's what we fought WW2 to prevent. What's further down these slippery slopes ? We don't have to find out if we never compromise the Constitution and the ethical tradition it represents. The crisis over King Obama's usupation of legitimate authority was a long time building, involved both parties, and has revealed a staggering moral bankruptcy at the heart of our political institutions. A country gets the government it "deserves", so its hard to believe our Congressional and Judicial aristocracy have the intestinal or moral fortitude to get us out of this quagmire.
Unless they do our Republic is overthrown, the Constitution and the rule of law protect no one, we are fast sliding down a greasy slope to devil knows where. Historically those who offer leadership to solve the problems of decadence are secretly sicker and more evil than the problem (Hitler, Lenin, Franco, Mao, Pol Pot - closer to home Nixon and Clinton) so installing King Obama as criminal monarch is probably more of the same (see above). There is no practical way forward that is not based on humble renewal of our civilized heritage: why would our forbears have sacrificed so much for it ? Anyhow...it's more than just a few diehards trying to spoil your $150M+ party, it's more like Committees of Correspondence and Sons of Liberty. Look 'em up.
You obviously haven't read my post at another page on this blog, so to be helpful:
Therefore the facts: no (repeat NO) SOS has ever seen Obama's Certific-ATE of Live Birth. The point at issue in the Berg (PA), Donofrio (NJ), Wrotnowski (CT), Taitz (CA), Pidgeon (WA) et al cases was that S'sOS claimed in court it was not their job to require the cadidates to qualify themselves; they accepted a candidate's legally-binding signed attestation and a letter from the DNC ( or RNC) "certifying" eligiblity: ie it was an honor-system, where the Committees posed as quasi-state authorities. There never was a Certifici-ATE of Live Birth - how could there be when Obama won't release it (whatever it is) from Hawaiian custody ? Obama posted photos on several websites of a Certific-ATION of Live Birth, which is a different animal altogether, and no one is on record as ever seeing a paper copy except the minions who claimed to have taken "snaps".
Here are my claims...backed up:
The address for Mr and Mrs Obama I in the BHO II newspaper birth announcement was a lie - records show a different family entirely lived there and the next-door neighbor at the time (still resident) confirms the Obamas did NOT live there. So what else about that announcement was a lie ? [Baro affidavit: not rebutted]
Obama has NEVER produced any documents proving citizenship, only posted online some doctored photos (not admissible in court) of a prima facie (ie not sufficient if challenged) Birth Certificat-ION, which is available for non-US births on a relative's sayso. [Polarik and Lines afidavits: not rebutted]
BHO II parents' divorce documents falsely claim required periods of residence for BHO I and Mrs Obama. The Dunham-Soetoro divorce documents falsely claim Mrs Soetoro and daughter are US citizens: Mrs Soetoro expatriated on marriage; her daughter was Indonesian-born and Indonesia doesn't permit dual citizenship. [Public record, Indonesian Constitution and Law: not rebutted]
Obama's Selective Service registration includes several impossible anomalies ( eg USPO stamp, wrong date, 2008 number etc ) which establish it as another crude forgery. [Expert discussion at debbieschlussel.com: not rebutted]
Obama has comprehensively lied on the record about his employment at BIC and Chicago in the early 1980s. [Co-workers at analyzethis.net and Cbsnews.com 2007: not rebutted]
Several contract employees (including one hire from Obama's ex-CIA Homeland Security Advisor's firm) were fired after illegally accessing on several occasions in 2008 Obama's State Dept records (which might contain birth certificates, naturalization certificates, or oaths of allegiance etc). [Public record and national media]
The Obama Transition, without precedent, contemptuously used a simulacrum of the US Great Seal, and improperly acquired a ".gov" domain, in order to lend spurious authenticity to a fictitious "Office of the President-Elect" and a fraudulent election "victory". As Seal, so COLB ? (18 USC Sec. 713 ...(a) Whoever knowingly displays any printed or other likeness of the great seal of the United States... or any facsimile thereof...for the purpose of conveying, or in a manner reasonably calculated to convey, a false impression of sponsorship or approval by the Government of the United States or by any department, agency, or instrumentality thereof, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than six months, or both.) [Public record and national media: not rebutted]
PdeB
Brandon
"Obama was born in Hawaii." You are so wrong----- that is what Obama has consistantly refused to prove. Instead of releasing proof he was born in Hawaii (the Hawaiin certificate he released means NOTHING except that his parents lived in Hawaii a year), Obama hired 3 law firms and spent almost a million dollars instead of making a call, paying $25 and releasing his vault copy of his birth certificate.
You don't have a clue. There is no proof that Obama was born in Hawaii- which is why a VAULT copy of his birth certificate---which he has REFUSED to provide- is so important. That certificate he released means NOTHING except that his parents resided in Hawaii a Year.
Obama voted in the PATRIOT ACT. You DON'T EVEN KNOW WHAT HE HAS VOTED FOR. HE SUPPORTED BUSH IN THE WAR, VOTED FOR BUSH WITH THE PATRIOT ACT---the man is a liar. He says he will repeal the patriot act, but forgot to tell you he voted it in.
IDIOT
To touch on an issue bigger than this:
Calling people an idiot does nothing to further conversation, the transfer of knowledge, legitimate debate, etc.
It also doesn't change the fact that the President of the United States holds his title after meeting all the criteria for holding this office.
The most visible, scrutinized, researched and criticized person in America right now is President Obama, who was born in Hawaii. If he weren't he would not be President.
Take your energy and try to change whatever policies of his you disagree with rather than ran the flames of flimsy consipiracy theories.
And you're not an idiot.
-Brandon
Obama is a lying criminal traitor guilty of treason twice under the Logan Act. He is not a natural born citizen- even if he were born in Hawaii, he lost citizenship upon adoption by Lolo soetoro and acceptance of Indonesian Citizenship---as dual citizenship with US was not allowed- a fact proven by his travel to Pakistan in 1981, which was illegal to enter for US citizens. By setting foot in Pakistan, he disavowed his US citizenship or allegiance to the US, and used another citizenship to enter. The man is up to his unusually large ears in Chicago corruption and kickbacks, and has installed half of the Chicago Combine as his appointees. There has never been a greater fraud perpetrated on the US citizens than the lying criminal traitor illegally using the name Barack Obama. He holds the greatest office of this great land under an illegal name without US citizenship. UNBELIEVABLE. This man is not my president and it's an insult of unimaginable proportions to see him installed as President. To think that a corrupt criminal lying non-citizen traitor expects patriots to bow to him is insane. The criminal Obama is not and will never be MY president. I don't bow to traitors.
Post a Comment