That eerie election night, November 2008, the Obamas in their anarcho-communistSo who's your daddy, BHO?
Ayers admits (again) he wrote Obama bio
Weather Underground terrorist speaks to new generation of SDSPosted: March 26, 2011
11:31 pm Eastern
By Jerome R. Corsi.NEW YORK – Bill Ayers has once again suggested he was the author of Barack Obama's celebrated autobiography, even though the admission could be explained away as a mocking irony designed only to goad Ayers's critics by yet another false admission he was the president's ghostwriter. At the conclusion of a speech sponsored by the Students for a Democratic Society at Montclair State University in New Jersey, the former Weather Underground bomber gleefully claimed credit for writing Obama's "Dreams from My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance."
As shown in a video clip on YouTube, Ayers responding to a question about "Dreams," said, "Did you know that I wrote it, incidentally?"
Here is the transcript of the exchange between Ayers and a member of the audience asking about "Dreams":
continues
The Book-TV presentation of Deconstructing Obama will be shown three times this upcoming weekend on C-SPAN II. Check schedule for local times at http://cs.pn/eUrWpC or watch online at http://cs.pn/guailO
While out promoting my new book, Deconstructing Obama, I have been asked a few times about Obama's mysterious Social Security number.
As to how Obama may have secured that number, it is possible that he turned to his radical friends for advice.
Jack Cashill is the author of numerous books which reveal important facts about the powerful and their sometimes clandestine power moves. Deconstructing Obama is his latest, released this February. 
Graphic added by Investigating Obama
The riveting Cashill presentation, describing the making of Deconstructing Obama:
Purchase This Program
Future Airings
- Saturday, March 19th at 1:45pm (ET)
- Saturday, March 19th at 7pm (ET)
- Sunday, March 20th at 3:30am (ET)
Past Airings
- Sunday, March 13th at 10am (ET)
To you who follow Investigating Obama, be sure to follow Gulag Bound:Web: GulagBound.comAnd look at our new collaboration with other key exposers of the Marxofascist insurrection:
Twitter.com/GulagBound
RSS: thru Feedburner or native
Facebook.com/GulagBound
The Globe & MalevolencePlus, I have some news for you about Jack Cashill and his upcoming book, Deconstructing Obama...
Admin
8/5/2010
Jack Cashill
8/5/2010
Arlen Williams
8/4/2010
mamacooks
8/4/2010
mamacooks
8/4/2010
You may know that author, Jack Cashill could rival Sherlock Holmes in his detective work concerning Bill Ayers' apparent ghost-writing, for Barack Obama's two books. As I reflect, Mr. Cashill's own writing is more enjoyable than Arthur Conan Doyle's. And the more one reads of it, the more apparent the criminal mind of Billie Ayers becomes, inside Barry's books' covers.Yes,
start with this one. Why bottom to top? That is the way they are listed at Cashill.com. It makes sense for Jack's return visitors to see the latest at the top and in my laziness, I defer to his kindness.You can also hear Jack in interviews via this linked page and twice as a guest on our program, "The Awakening."How the Liberal Mind Works
©Jack Cashill
AmericanThinker.com - May 30, 2010In April of this year, I wrote an article for American Thinker about David Remnick’s new book, The Bridge, and titled it, “New Obama Bio Strengthens Case for Dreams Fraud.”
“It surprised me to learn that David Remnick had dedicated three pages of his comprehensive new Obama biography, The Bridge, to my thesis that Bill Ayers helped Barack Obama write Obama’s 1995 memoir, Dreams From My Father,” I wrote at the time. “It will surprise Remnick even more to learn that he has unwittingly reinforced a thesis that he set out to discredit.”
That night Milt Rosenberg of Chicago’s dominant AM radio station, WGN, was hosting Remnick for two hours in studio. A mutual friend arranged for me to call in just as though I were a regular caller. I was finally able to locate the audio.
If I seem too polite in the exchange that follows it was because I did not want to embarrass Rosenberg. This format offered the rare opportunity for someone from what Remnick calls the “Web’s farthest lunatic orbit” to splash down in the refined waters of the liberal elite.
For the record, Remnick is the Princeton-educated, Washington Post-groomed, Pulitzer-Prize winning New Yorker editor. I am a “little-known conservative writer” who lives in Kansas City.
When I called in, I introduced myself, said that “David” would probably know who I am, and noted that I had originated the thesis that Bill Ayers helped Barack Obama write Dreams From My Father. The question I posed to Remnick was this, “Why did you ignore the six detailed pages Christopher Andersen spent confirming my thesis?”
Rosenberg, bless his heart, asked me who Andersen was and what was my thesis. This allowed me several minutes to report in detail what Andersen had discovered.
As I explained, Andersen is “a celebrity biographer with great establishment credentials.” I said on air how I had talked to Andersen, who told me had two sources on the ground in Hyde Park.
Rosenberg allowed me to establish in some detail how Andersen documented the Obamas’ financial struggles in the early 1990s. Andersen related how at the urging of Michelle, a “hopelessly blocked” Obama turned to “friend and neighbor” Bill Ayers to help him with his much acclaimed 1995 memoir, Dreams From My Father.
Andersen’s details are specific. The Obamas were convinced of “Ayers’s proven abilities as a writer.” Barack particularly liked the novelistic style of To Teach, a 1993 book by Ayers. Obama hoped to use a comparable style for his own family history. The problem was that although he had taped interviews with many of his relatives, he could not find it in himself to write the book.
Andersen documented Obama’s blown advances, his futile escape to Bali, the growing financial and emotional pressure to finish a memoir he had started four years earlier.
The key sentence in Andersen’s account is the one that I quoted on air almost verbatim: “These oral histories, along with his partial manuscript and a trunkload of notes were given to Ayers.” Added Andersen, “Thanks to help from veteran writer Ayers, Barack would be able to submit a manuscript to his editors at Times Book.”
I was also able to explain how up until the point of writing what Time Magazine called “the best-written memoir ever produced by an American politician,” Obama had written nothing of consequence. What he had written, said I, “as David points out,” was a “muddled” article in a Columbia University weekly called Sundial, nothing at all as a legal scholar save for one case note at Harvard, and “one really half-assed article” on community organizing.
Remnick came out swinging, and as I knew, a person in studio has a huge tactical advantage over a person on the phone. The quotes that follow from Remnick are word-for-word. To get a true feel for what condescension sounds like in its purest, most undistilled form, please listen to the audio about 47 minutes in:
http://www.wgnradio.com/shows/ext720/wgnam-david-remnick-the-bridge-full-program,0,5756039.mp3file
“Mr. Castle (sic), this is David Remnick. Let’s be clear about something. So on the basis of a book by a celebrity biographer of two unnamed sources--Who are those sources by the way? Do you know?”
“He wouldn’t tell me.”
“Okay,” said Remnick emphatically, as though his point had been confirmed.
“Do you reveal your unnamed sources?” I asked. Having read his book, I knew that Remnick used such sources, often for key details, sometimes bogus, like for the instance the person known only as “aide” who misled Remnick on how Obama managed to write Audacity of Hope.
“My book is filled with hundreds of named sources.”
“But so is Andersen’s.”
“Yes, but you are not providing any sources here. So on the basis of two unnamed sources in a celebrity biographer’s book that really has had very little currency and on your own notion that he uses the word ‘eyes’ a lot . . . “
“Hold it right there,” I said. “Hold it.” Remnick had said something comparably slighting in his book. Those on the left are so used to saying such rubbish unchallenged that he must have forgotten where he was.
“I let you speak. Now you are going to let me respond.”
“Go ahead,” I conceded, trying not to make things awkward for my generous host.
“So it is hardly scientific,” Remnick continued. “I find it deeply offensive. First of all the history of literature is filled, filled with writers whose first books appear on the scene and they are very good or excellent or they are better.”
This is true only to a degree. All great authors have a first book, usually very good, and always at the end of a paper trail strewn with other good writing. Obama’s paper trail leads back to a literary junk pile. His sudden flowering is miraculous and unprecedented. Unfortunately, I did not have the chance to explain this on the air.
“I make no fantastic claims for his memoir,” Remnick continued. “I don’t come out of there claiming it to be Moby Dick or Richard Wright or anything of the kind. I describe it as a very good book and no more and no less, but I examine it as a book that tells us something about Barack Obama, naturally, and something that comes out of the memoir tradition in African American literature and American literature folklore.”
Richard Wright is an African American author. Note how Remnick feels the need to balance an undeniable classic by a white guy with a black guy of sufficiently lesser stature that he does not--or cannot--cite a Wright book. Affirmative action on the fly!
“So your theory, and it was a theory expounded as well by a much bigger microphone, by Rush Limbaugh, got a lot of currency on the Internet, and I find it offensive on the minimal amount of proof you provided, in fact, on no proof at all that I could find convincing . . . “
“Well,” I interjected.
“I am going to finish my thought here, Okay?” Remnick scolded, sounding all the world like my second-grade nun. “There is something innately offensive about the notion that this man is incapable of writing a book.” I should add that in his book Remnick laments “the ugly pedigree” of my and Limbaugh’s “racist insinuation.”
“I am not saying he is stupid. I never did say that.”
“But you are saying he is faking the book.”
“Yes, I am absolutely saying that. He had help, serious help, and all evidence points in that direction.”
I must confess to being a little perturbed here. If you listen to the audio, you will want to strangle Remnick too. I plowed on.
Remnick answered, nearly averting a newsworthy Freudian slip. He then launched into an odd and disingenuous account of how he “has great respect for serious conservatives” who challenge Obama on his policies, the political equivalent of “some of my best friends are black.”“And when you reduce the 20,000 or so words I did of textual comparison to saying ‘something about eyes,’ you are insulting me. And when you call me a racist, David, or when you call Limbaugh a racist, you are insulting the whole damn audience.”
“The instances of Barack uh , , uh Rush Limbaugh using racist language is so long as to beggar the imagination,”
“So why do you call me a racist?” I asked, cutting to the chase.
At this point, Rosenberg thanked me for calling in. If Remnick were gesturing wildly to kill the conversation, I would not have been surprised. Once he had imputed racism to a lesser mortal—the most popular liberal hobby after recycling--he had no other argument to make.
“I appreciate your having me on,” I said to Rosenberg. “Sorry, but I don’t like being called a racist, and that is part of the problem with the post-racial fraud we are living under now because all criticism is racist.”
So the conversation ended. I don’t get to talk to liberals much anymore.
-- Jack
Jack Cashill is one of America's truly cutting edge political and cultural analysts, and one of our best writers. Join us as we discuss banking and usury, central bank manipulation, derivatives mania, how it all got to be this way, what in the world happened in 2008... and... how America's and the world's economies so dangerously pivot, lurch, and sway, here and now.
"In his upbeat and engaging new book, Jack Cashill reverse engineers the train wreck of the economy back to its (surprising) roots."UPDATE: This program was revealing. It remains available for you to hear and to heed. (By the way, God is good and Hanen's child is fine.) I encourage you to look into all the opera (that means "works" ;-) of these three important communicators. And, Animal Colony is looking like an excellent gift idea. It is especially good for sharing with liberals and those ignorant of current affairs -- or, for those who do book reports, this new schoolyear -- or, for treating yourself -- and, Christmas is not all that far away....
Tonight on "The Awakening," we have three very important guests and what they reveal can help us save our free America, as we pass it on to others.
1. Jack Cashill: author and researcher of American Marxism and central bank manipulations; see his new article, "Obama, Ayers and the Knowledge 'Too Big' to Handle"
2. James Simpson describes how Obama's "healthcare" is really Alinsky and Cloward-Piven -style "Manufactured Healthcare Crisis" and lends his own analysis of Obama's
relationship with Weathermen and SDS revolutionaries.3. Mark Olsen: co-author of an excellent new allegorical book, Animal Colony, a very engaging instruction in American Freedom vs. Marxism, for both children and adults,
Join us in a dynamic discussion about facts and understanding that you can relate to those you know, to win our war, imposed upon us by this global, Marxofascist insurgency.
Click to listen at Sentinel Radio's blogtalkradio page
Arlen, I.O., Awakening in Twitter
Arlen, I.O., Awakening: Facebook
RSS feed, articles a/o commentsEcclesiastes 3:9-15
What profit has the worker from that in which he labors? I have seen the God-given task with which the sons of men are to be occupied. He has made everything beautiful in its time. Also He has put eternity in their hearts, except that no one can find out the work that God does from beginning to end.
I know that nothing is better for them than to rejoice, and to do good in their lives, and also that every man should eat and drink and enjoy the good of all his labor -- it is the gift of God. I know that whatever God does, it shall be forever. Nothing can be added to it, and nothing taken from it. God does it, that men should fear before Him. That which is has already been, and what is to be has already been; and God requires an account of what is past.
Psalm 120:2
Rescue me, O Lord, from liars and from all deceitful people"
Larry Grathwohl spoke of his work as a federal investigator assigned to penetrate Bill Ayers' and Bernardine Dohrn's Weathermen -- the bombings and the deaths -- and a new possibility for prosecution. Also discussed: the entire Marxist network in America, right up to Barack Obama.
To listen at the btr site, click here
James Simpson of the "Manufactured Crisis" articles and Sam Sewell, who had experience with Alinsky-style Marxist operations, plus other Marxist bombers (literally) also joined us.
