Mr. President, Whose Side Are You On? - Rep. Mark Pence re. Israel

6/10 video, "Pence: 'Mr. President, Whose Side Are You On?'"

Now, Representative Pence, about that "Mister President" part....

h/t: CMDR Kerchner

Israel vs. Gaza, Hamas, Islamists, Marxofascists & Other Friends of BHO: See RBO for Coverage

For the best, critical reporting and analysis, I.O. suggests monitoring RBO, search word: Israel.
- http://therealbarackobama.wordpress.com/?s=Israel

The Coup Continues - Dennis C. Blair

U.S. Rep. Pete Hoekstra (MI-R) on the resignation of Dennis Blair as Director of National Intelligence: "Blair’s resignation is the result of the Obama administration’s rampant politicization of national security and outright disregard for congressional intelligence oversight. Blair’s resignation is disturbing and unfortunate." - (a bit more at Newsmax).

In order for Marxofascist globalists to control a nation, clearly they must control its intelligence resources. Look for more unrest and intramural struggles in the CIA, FBI, NSA, etc. What we need from them are whistle blowers. How about it, Mr. Blair? And what exactly was the catalyst for your resignation?

Don't expect important revelations from Admiral Blair, however. See this from his profile by the Council on Foreign Relations, brighter red highlights by I.O.

A former Rhodes Scholar, Blair speaks Russian and is an expert on U.S. policy toward Asia. He co-chaired the Council on Foreign Relations independent task force that published a 2007 report recommending that the U.S. government work to integrate China into the global community.

The subject of the CFR came up in the "Awakening" interview with Trevor Loudon (featured in I.O's recent posting). Also, Loudon's observation that terrorist Islamists work "hand in glove" with international Marxists is especially germane to the resignation of the one in charge of overseeing terrorist intel.

Please ask and promote The Three SOVEREIGNTY NOW Questions.

Franklin Graham vs. the Marxofascist Insurrection's Unholy Alliance

Franklin Graham, Honorary Chairman of the National Day of Prayer Task Force, 2010, tells the gospel truth...


...but he need not be so pessimistic about our future, if Americans are willing to wake up and "repent," i.e., turn to the truth, and yield ourselves to it (hence, the word under-stand). That is how to truly become aware and strong. And people who do this will fulfill the responsibilities with which God charges them. Those who are Sovereign Citizens of America will carry out our responsibilities to govern our nation and influence our culture. For example, that is what you are doing, right?

But you know this is no anti-Christ we are facing, Franklin. Not enough talent. Of course, the spirits involved are anti-Christ; very much so. And Barack Obama knows he should not outwardly oppose Christianity. That has been tried, before. Rather, a good neo-Marxist will wear sheep's not wolf's garb, while he: 1. changes the message, 2. psychologically ostracizes those who "cling" to the true message, and 3. exerts a controlling influence over those who receive his "gospel."

Thus, Obama has repeatedly asserted that, "our individual salvation depends on collective salvation." That is a tenet of Marxism, including its Christian co-opting arm of liberation theology, but it is adversarial to the salvation which is offered by Jesus Christ directly, to every single one of us, through His ultimate sacrifice. Someone should warn Barack Obama that it is not only very harmful but very dangerous, to come between God Incarnate and the individual whose freedom He bought forever, by His own blood.

I just called evil anything that intervenes against the work of the Holy Spirit of God, directly dealing with any person, as He testifies of: 1. God's sinless holiness, 2. man's being lost in sin, alienated from God, and 3. Jesus' offering us one lovingly specific way back to God. One of many such interferences is the competing ideology of Islam. Shortly after 9/11, Franklin Graham cited Islam as evil. There is the divisiveness of which he is accused. And so, he was disinvited from today's (Christian) National Day of Prayer ceremony, at the Pentagon.

Ideological divisiveness appears to be a grave sin, in the irrationally truthless world of relativism and cultural Marxism. That is okay, though -- truly. Jesus himself warned He came to bring just this sword of perfect divisiveness, between the singular truth and every denial of it. He even let us know that the world would hate those who joined Him in proclaiming the truth, just as it hated Him.

Unlike Barack Obama's Department of Defense, you see, God's Son allows the freedom to hear God, if we wish, and to receive His grace, if we choose.

Therefore whoever confesses Me before men, him I will also confess before My Father who is in heaven. But whoever denies Me before men, him I will also deny before My Father who is in heaven.

Do not think that I came to bring peace on earth. I did not come to bring peace but a sword. For I have come to ‘set a man against his father, a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law’; and ‘a man’s enemies will be those of his own household.’ He who loves father or mother more than Me is not worthy of Me. And he who loves son or daughter more than Me is not worthy of Me. And he who does not take his cross and follow after Me is not worthy of Me. He who finds his life will lose it, and he who loses his life for My sake will find it.

He who receives you receives Me, and he who receives Me receives Him who sent Me. He who receives a prophet in the name of a prophet shall receive a prophet’s reward. And he who receives a righteous man in the name of a righteous man shall receive a righteous man’s reward.

- Jesus Christ, Matthew 10:32-43

Submitted to you on this Christian National Day of Prayer, May the Sixth, in the Year of our Lord, Two Thousand and Ten. - AW

'Nuclear Summit Logo Uses an Islamic-Shaped Crescent' - Alec Rawls

This is an excerpt from the blog, Error Theory, by Alec Rawls, Tuesday 4/13/2010

It is hard to believe that the State Department could do this by accident:

An Islamic crescent is a very distinct and completely unnatural geometric shape, created the intersection of two circles. This is done on basic religious principle, to make the Islamic crescent distinct from a lunar crescent and from the lit portion of any other globe in orbit around a sun. To take a natural shape like the crescent moon as a religious symbol would risk idolatry (the worship of any actual thing besides God). Thus Muslims use as their symbol a stylized and explicitly unnatural crescent shape.

So why is this unnatural crescent shape being used as an official State Department logo for Obama's Nuclear Security Summit? There is not a Muslim in the world who would miss the symbolism here:

World meeting, called by a United States president who makes a point of reminding the Islamic
world that his middle name is Hussein, presided over by a large Islamic-shaped crescent.
(Photo by Ron Sachs.)

Logos always use stylized shapes, but surely the State Department is aware that this particular stylized crescent shape is the closest thing Islam has to a universal insignia. (Wahabbists reject even the unnatural circle-in-circle crescent shape as idolatrous, making the only truly universal symbols of Islam the Koran, the declaration of faith--recited in the 5 times daily prayers--and the facing of Mecca for prayer, but none of these are graphic symbols.)

There is more to the story and it is important. Read the rest from the source. Alec Rawls' "About Me" bio is also an eye opening read. - AW

What Would a Pro-Islamist American Presidency Look Like?

This consideration is presented in two parts

1. The following, submitted in FreeRepublic.com, explores a question. What would America be experiencing, if it had an Islamist and Marxist president?

Obama is a Muslim Marxist
by "TheThinker," Saturday, 4/10/2010

Some say that the accusation that Obama is a Muslim is ludicrous and bigoted. But what if it's true? It would mean that Obama has been lying all along. But why would a Muslim be afraid to disclose his faith?

If one is to be a good Muslim, then many, many attitudes and behaviors that are uniquely American would have to be considered evil. He's slipped, admitting his Muslim faith and then recanted. He's stated that the call to prayer is the "prettiest sound on Earth". Obama has bowed (or was it an aborted kneel?) to the King of the Saudis. Obama is hiding his Muslim faith behind the thorny protection of political correctness.

Not convinced yet? Let's use our imaginations for a minute.Let's just suppose for the sake of argument that a random Muslim is sitting in the Oval Office. What, logically would that "good" Muslim do to fulfill the tenants of his faith?

The first target would be the American economy. That was the primary target on 9/11. Militant Islamists like Bin Laden figured that in order to defeat America, it's economic engine had to be stopped. And they are right. America's productivity is the source of America's might. It is buttressed by the American work ethic, faith and family. Of course all these are under attack more each day by Marxist legislators.

Second, America's military might must be curtailed. Funding must be cut. Successful weapons systems axed. Defense systems in particular must be undermined. Islamists want us defenseless as do all Marxists. If America is at a military disadvantage, then it is at a political and economic disadvantage as well.

Third, America's alliances must be broken up. The Europeans are our strongest allies because of the cultural similarities and America's origins. Those bonds must be broken and that puts Europe at a disadvantage as well making it easier for Islamists to colonize Europe.

Fourth, the Israelis must be abandoned both militarily and financially and totally isolated. The end goal would be to conquer Israel. There should be no more settlements. Jerusalem must be taken back to shame the Jews and re-establish Muslim dominance in the Middle East.

It seems to me that Obama is acting just like my hypothetical Muslim President. Like a typical Marxist, he's taking over industries, crippling productivity and wealth creation. He's crippling the military by cutting funding and destroying morale. He's snubbing important allies and the Israelis. He's cutting off weapons sales to the Israelis particularly bunker busters that can be used against Israels greatest threat, Iran. Israel is now at a severe disadvantage visa-vis its adversaries in the region.

Obama is a Muslim and Marxism is his weapon to destroy Islam's enemies, in particular America. He has no past and yet he guides America's future. The Orwellian lash of political correctness and white guilt elected Obama.

The Democrats wasted the mantle of the first black president on someone who won't unite, won't uplift, and won't strengthen America. It is both sad and frightening.

2. And these video excerpts of Barack Obama are pieced together in YouTube, by "FeelTheChangeMedia." Its point of view is one informed directly by the man himself, in his own words and behavior.

Pundits Agree: Obama Administration Knew about Lockerbie Bomber's Release Beforehand (and more, on Obama's Marxist/Islamist alliance)

UPDATE 9/1 - For a CIA counterterrorism officer's perspective, on the Obama/Holdren decision to investigate CIA terrorist interrogators, see, "CIA Counterterrorism Expert: Obama and Holder 'At War' with Agency," by Kent Clizbe, in James Simpsons's blog, TruthandCons. "At war with America," adds Jim.

The pattern holds, of Marxist/fascist revolution against authentic America, inside an overall movement for global control, co-opting fundamental Islamism and its terrorism. After all, the latter complements the Soros/Obama/Pelosi practice of economic sabotage and terrorism, as previously laid out by Cloward-Piven and Alinsky (and Trotsky and Lenin).

By the way, please note the term, "fundamental Islamism," and that I.O. refuses to use the cultural relativist verbiage, "Islamic fundamentalism." If true to nature and nature's God, fundamentalism is good and essential. An adherence to the fundamentals of America and all of Christ-influenced, thus, free Western Civilization is exactly what the cultural Marxists seek to rip and tear down, while they, as do Islamists, seek to subjugate us to their own, counterfeit version of the fundamentals of living in this world, based upon domination and central control.

<<<<<<<<<<<<<> I.O.<>>>>>>>>>>>>>

UPDATE 8/31 - For a report of the lastest news of Obama's unholy alliance of radical Marxists with radical Islamists, see WorldNetDaily's "White House Czar Urged 'Resistance' Against U.S." That is yet another Van Jones story (a.k.a., Jonesin' for the Vanguard?). For an introduction to last year's news about it, you can see see "Investigating Obama: Career Path Toward a Neo-Marxist Presidency."

<<<<<<<<<<<<<> I.O.<>>>>>>>>>>>>>

"...the idea that we did not know before his release, to me is preposterous," said Mike Barnacle.

To which Morning Joe's Mika, daughter of NWO-Zbiggie (Zbigniew Brzezinski) added, "Yeah... yeah... or a bad sign."

Harold Ford: "If we did not know, to your point, it's troubling. If we did know, uh, the White House is going to have to answer: why weren't you as outraged as many of us are, today?"

By the way, "many of us," Mr. Ford?


And did Barack Hussein Obama assent to it?

Scarborough: "If this did not end up, Mike Barnacle, at the White House, I... would... be... shocked."

And they ended with the necessity to ask what the White House knew and when they knew it, left on the counter-top. Do you suppose someone will deign to ask? Someone breaking out of the Marxstream media pack?

an oily mess, in an unholy alliance
hat tip: Count Us Out

Obama on Iran: No Change, No Hope

Please pardon, if you wanted to read an article here, but the title is enough for I.O.

Except... is there not some history between the original Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini and Soviet Moscow? Could Obama have an affinity with the Ayatollah dynasty for ties that bind?

And just one more thing... how does this compare with his feverish campaigning for Marxist Raila Odinga, in taxpayer-sponsored venturing to Kenya, in 2006? Despite apparent campaign contributions related to Obama of $1,000,000, Odinga lost. Odinga's proletariat armies rioted, at least one church was burned, and over one thousand Kenyans were killed. Where were his calls for peace and passivity instead of transition, then? (Odinga thuggery did get concessions.)