Wednesday, January 7, 2009

A Guide to the Legal Challenges of Barack Obama’s Candidacy - Continually Updated - See Below & Sidebar

Update, 1/9/2009: This post is now slipping down the I.O. blog files.

Please contact your senators and representative in Congress (and others you believe may care about the Consititution) by phone call, fax, and/or telegraph.
Let them know they have an overriding duty to perform, of being faithful to and defending the Constitution. And the Constitution requires that both parents of a president must be American citizens at that person's birth. They have no place to hide. Congress is due to vote on certifying the Electoral College vote, this coming Thursday, 1/8. And Justices on the Supreme Court are waiting for their application/petition against a malfeasant Obama certification.

Meanwhile, only half the states have submitted their votes? Demand that a count of submitted votes be done (so they know what they must refuse by constitutional law).


Congressional Oath of Office

“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.”


Question:
Please make a list of what the SCOTUS Justice, Scalia, would need to show to his colleagues in order to get three more to agree to cert or to remand back to lower court with stipulation that Berg now has standing. Telegrams [I.O.: and faxes and calls -- also, call senators and representatives before or even through Thursday, 1/8] to the judges can still get to them before the 1/9/09 conference meeting. What are the 'bullet points' to raise?
I.O's Answer:
1. Barack Obama is manifestly not a natural born Citizen as required by Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5, due to his citizenship in the United Kingdom at birth, by hereditary right from his father, as conferred by British law and recognized by American law (and international law). The purpose of this clause is clearly to preclude from the Presidency as Commander in Chief, any person with, from birth, any competing national allegiance -- an intention of national security as outlined to George Washington by letter of John Jay. (And an allegiance to the U.K. was their chief concern, as it was clearly the nation which posed America's greatest threat.)

Further, the meaning of natural born Citizen at the time of the framing is clear, from Vatel and Tucker, whose writings were held at the highest educational authority by the framers and were uncontradicted at the framing of the Constitution; also subsequently, by Bingham and the case, Perkins v. ELG. The criteria: both, a. born in U.S. territory and, b. each parent being U.S. citizens, hence no other national jurisdiction.

Further, if Barack Obama's father was not married to his mother at the time of his birth, his mother was not old enough to bestow natural born Citizenship upon her son.

2. Barack Obama became an Indonesian citizen as a child, while the United States had no arrangement for dual-citizenship with Indonesia. Thereby, if he was before that time a United States Citizen, that Citizenship was revoked.

3. Barack Obama has shown no valid, legal proof of United States Citizenship, nor United States birth, to any agency of government whatsoever that is or must be charged with the supervision of any process of the election of a president, or the certification of its candidates.

See this article regarding issue number 1
. // ht: MHGinTN

Update 12/30, PM - Obama's online "Birth Certificate" is not evidentiary, according to a professional document examiner. See the report, along with an riff about how "evidence" may or may not be evidence -- plus one idea of why Barack Obama might not want his actual Hawaiian Birth Certificate revealed, even if it does show he was born in America.

Update 12/24, AM -
See today's posting, "Oklahoma St. Rep. Mike Ritze Requesting Congress to Challenge Obama's Eligibility" for some of the latest news in the efforts to get U.S. senators and representatives to challenge the Congressional certification of Obama's election, January 8 -- and to prepare to take it to court.

Get a snapshot of each natural born Citizen case on the "Eligibility Lawsuits" page at The Right Side of Life -- like checking the "Standings, Scores, and Schedule" page of the sports section, if you will. The Right Side and others are countering the media black-out and spin by chronicling developments in these cases. See their section on the I.O. Sidebar.

You may also wish to check out:
"Save our Rights" -- a wiki, documenting all the attempts to avoid America's fictitious presidency.

Please, let us demand that a few honest patriots in Congress, on behalf of our constitutional cohesiveness as a nation, move to avert the national disaster of an unchecked and illegitimate, "Citizen of the World," presidency.

This can be an update-intensive entry. You can use ChangeDetection.com to be emailed with updates, or use the newsfeed of your choice.

<<<<<<<<<<<<> I.O.<>>>>>>>>>>>>

Does America have one honest, courageous senator?
If God gives us one senator to take this to the Supreme Court, representatives will also be found.

This remains a critical time at the Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and courts below.
One lower court ruled in September that federal courts do not have jurisdiction to hear challenges to presidential candidates' eligibility until after Congress certifies Monday's Electoral College vote (mandated for January 8). This is now being tested by petitions to the SCOTUS seeking injunctions against that very certification.

Is the SCOTUS holding review of any of its earlier natural born Citizen cases as "pending,"
though the Donofrio and Wrotnowski petitions for injunction against the popular and Electoral College votes have been denied? Are they keeping them on file as it were, for potential reference or formal review, when further challenges to Obama's candidacy (in addition to the Berg case) occur, immediately after January 8?

On January 8, if at least one U.S. senator and at least one representative object to the certification of the Electoral College vote, they must confer and caucus. Then, if the Congress still certifies the vote for Obama, these objecting congressmen would theoretically have the greatest standing before the Supreme Court. Are there such members of Congress who will take this before the Court?

If not, who will the SCOTUS deem worthy of being granted a writ of certiorari -- to have their case given a formal review and decision? Upon what grounds? Who will come forward and whose case(s) will be allowed into the chamber?

These are questions I.O. is attempting to answer where possible, or at least provide a reasonable "weather report."

Some of these cases are based in large part, upon Barack Obama's foreign citizenship at birth, by inheritance from his father; others, chiefly about his withholding of his actual and presumed original, Hawaiian Birth Certificate.


Since Barack Obama's father (BHO I) was apparently an U.K. citizen when BHO II was born, by the original intent and understanding of the Constitution, he was never a natural born Citizen as that term was meant and therefore unable to serve as United States President. That, by the careful interpretation of the Constitution's framers, based upon authoritative sources, corroborated by pertinent contemporaneous commentary, and unhindered by case law. See I.O's "Daddy Says No! - Articles Assessing the Constitution's "Natural Born Citizen" Clause, Barack Hussien Obama I, and BHO II" among the articles below.

Then, there is the original, authoritative birth certificate. Why has Obama spent nearly $1M to keep it unseen? If it disqualifies him, Obama may be guilty of criminal fraud -- major criminal fraud.

Numerous of the civil cases also point out that due to his apparent Indonesian citizenship as a child, Obama has since become a naturalized citizen, or else he is an illegal alien.

Whatever Obama's particulars are (and America does deserve to see his actual birth certificate) there is no apparent "out" here -- no sound explanation in sight but that Barack Obama is constitutionally disqualified from being sworn in, on January 20. That being the case, his candidacy has been legally fictitious from the Iowa Caucuses, onward and each presidential ballot including his name was an injury and insult to the Sovereign American Voter.


<<<<<<<<<<<<> I.O.<>>>>>>>>>>>>

.EQUAL . JUSTICE . UNDER . LAW
...

From December 4 onward, Investigating Obama will publish a guide to on-line information about the legal challenges of the status of Barack Obama as a candidate for United States president. Links will be provided to pertinent information. Analysis will be included, for the sake of cutting through clutter and to provide rationale.

Purpose:
to clarify what has been underreported and obfuscated in the media, and to allow U.S Citizens to spread the news on their own, taking comfort in documented verifiability where that is found.

Why should the Supreme Court decide upon these matters before the voting taken by the Electoral College, scheduled for December 15, the subsequent congressional recognition, and the Oath of Office on January 20?

1. Because our nation's integrity and social order are based upon the firm and definite meaning of the Constitution, or we become a nation of increasing tyrannies, where breakdown and elitist domination, or outright authoritarianism historically ensue.

2. Because we risk having a fictitious, usurping presidency, which would mean, sooner or later, any of our false president's decisions, including executive orders and signed legislation, would be subject to court challenge, or international challenge, to be considered null and void. This could well bring both national and international chaos.

3. Because the People of the United States of America are simply owed a legitimate president and to be presented with constitutional candidates only.

See below, see the I.O. sidebar:

<<<<<<<<<<<<> I.O.<>>>>>>>>>>>>

I.O. will also continue to refer to top links covering the Fitzgerald investigations, branching out from the prosecution of Obama's financier middle-man and slumlord, the Arab oil-moneyed Tony Rezko (his sentencing delayed again as he sings) and now extending to the charges against Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich, and beyond.

For instance, have you heard from the "mainstream" media that Fitzgerald "interviewed" (interrogated?) Obama, on December 18?

39 comments:

Tony Lopez-Cisneros said...

ANYTHING SHORT OF THE FULL DISCLOSURE OF OBAMA'S ORIGINAL BIRTH CERTIFICATE IS TREASON AGAINST THE U.S.A. ! ! !

written by Tony Lopez-Cisneros, December 04, 2008

Although Hawiian Officials have "vouched" for Barack Obama's Birth Certificate as being True, Genuine, Authentic & Valid;

THAT does NOT In & Of Itself MAKE The "Birth Certificate" that Mr. Obama has Stashed, Holed-up and/or Locked Away in a "state vault" any MORE True, Genuine, Authentic & Valid: EXCEPT or UNLESS It Be RELEASED FOR PUBLIC & PROFESSIONAL AUTHENTICATION & VIEWING BEFORE MR. OBAMA IS "ELECTED" PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BY "THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE" THIS 15th OF DECEMBER, 2008 !--

AND THUS MR. OBAMA CAN OFFICIALLY BE SWORN IN AS PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ON JANUARY 20, 2009 !

WHY HAS MR. OBAMA AGGRIVATED FURTHER DOUBT ON THIS MOST GRAVE MATTER OF U.S. CONSTITUTIONAL LAW; AND PRE-REQUISITE FOR FULFILLING THE FEDERAL & LAWFUL REQUIREMENTS: FOR LEGALLY BEING ELECTED TO & LEGALLY EXECUTING THE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ?

WHY HAS HE SPENT OVER $ 800,000.00 IN LEGAL FEES & FUNDS TO DENY HIS "LOCKED IN A STATE VAULT" BIRTH CERTIFICATE FROM PUBLIC SCRUTINY & AUTHENTICATION ?

THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEMAND A CLEAR, HONEST, MORAL, ETHICAL & FORTHWITH ANSWER --

ALONG WITH THE PUBLIC DISCLOSURE OF THE "LOCKED IN A STATE VAULT" BIRTH CERTIFICATE OF BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA BEFORE DECEMBER 15, 2008:

AND MOST DEFINITELY BEFORE JANUARY 20, 2009 !

ANYTHING SHORT OF THE ABOVE DEMAND IS TO COMMIT TREASON AGAINST THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; THE SEVERAL (50) STATES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; AND THE PEOPLES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: ALONG WITH ITS TERRITORIES, POSSESSIONS AND ASSOCIATED STATES (I.E. PUERTO RICO) & ETC.!!!

TRUTHFULLY, HONESTLY & RESPECTFULLY YOURS,

Tony Lopez-Cisneros
2002/2004 Candidate For Congress,
United States House of Representatives,
4th Congressional District,
State of Illinois.

Website: http://www.lopez-cisnerosin2002.0catch.com
E-mail: tonyin2002@hotmail.com

ObamaBirth said...

This link gives the status of other cases.

http://americamustknow.com/default.aspx

click

ObamaBirth said...

FAQ on Obama's Birth

http://sites.google.com/site/obamabirth

Visit for a heads-up on the issues.

Arlen Williams said...

Thank you, "ObamaBirth." Maybe I can get in touch with the administrator of the first site and transfer some of his information, especially since he has had to quit.

I see the second site you list includes "The Donofrio Natural Born Citizen Challenge" article, as well as much information regarding the birth certificate mystery.

Arlen Williams said...

Anyone else have a suggestion?

(CAPT-DAX) said...

I am not an historian,

however, it is becoming more apparent everyday that there is a full fledged plot to overthrow the Constitution as the Founding Fathers intended it to be implemented.

I wanted to just cite Article II, Section 5 that lists the qualifications for President of the United States:

"No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years,

and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States"

Anonymous said...

Obama's lawyers Kirkland and Ellis have submitted a lawsuit saying the Natural Bron Citizen is no legal to today life. That is is discrimation against naturalized citizens. I think that is why it is there to stop naturazized citizens from becoming President. Obama excelled in his studies of Muslim and so I do not want that kind of man as my President. WE are infidels to himl. He has to show us proof he is a natural born citizen of the US. OR he is an imposter and should be be President.

Ted said...

An explanation for the Supreme Court to wait until the last possible moment (Monday morning) before issuing anything is just in case Team Obama were to submit some documentation (on his birth etc. ) between the time the Court makes its issuance and the Electors commence their actions on Monday. In other words, over the weekend Team Obama could release some documentation which might tend to undermine a basis for the issuance of the Court.

A real chess match!

Music said...

A Video Message to Our Electors:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sX7uuhHXs-0

citizenwells said...

FYI

I called Patrick Fitzgerald's office today and faxed the following:

http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2008/12/11/obama-indictment-blagojevich-arrest-patrick-fitzgerald-december-11-2008-rezko-trialobama-rezko-levine-blagojevich-health-planning-board-pay-for-play-il-senate-obama-arrest-and-indictment/

Madcap said...

I put this out today after spending two days reading 78 page complaint. This is a summary of what I found. Please pass it along.

What Did Obama Know, and When Did He Know It? Chicago Democrat Machine Revealed

http://www.thoughtsongod.com/?p=1936

Arlen Williams said...

Friday 12/12 9:09pm - Stephen "Steve" Pidgeon is on Plains Radio" now. Mr. Pidgeon leads the "natural born Citizen" challenge in Washington state.

Anonymous said...

Yes,had it on at start and turned it off.Just checked at 925pm central and Steve is on.They should announce guests ahead of time. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6054696301896752957&ei=AS1DSZrnM4mwrQKy_JCdDw&q=profiles+of+an+antichrist&hl=en

Anonymous said...

BREAKING NEWS!!!

White House says "No Blair House for Obama until after Electoral College vote count".

http://www.uslaw.com/pop/?p=164

Arlen Williams said...

A Video Message to Our Electors:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sX7uuhHXs-0

December 12, 2008 11:32 AM
Delete
Blogger citizenwells said...

FYI

I called Patrick Fitzgerald's office today and faxed the following:

http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2008/12/11/obama-indictment-blagojevich-arrest-patrick-fitzgerald-december-11-2008-rezko-trialobama-rezko-levine-blagojevich-health-planning-board-pay-for-play-il-senate-obama-arrest-and-indictment/

December 12, 2008 4:25 PM
Delete
Blogger Madcap said...

I put this out today after spending two days reading 78 page complaint. This is a summary of what I found. Please pass it along.

What Did Obama Know, and When Did He Know It? Chicago Democrat Machine Revealed

http://www.thoughtsongod.com/?p=1936

December 12, 2008 4:43 PMI put this out today after spending two days reading 78 page complaint. This is a summary of what I found. Please pass it along.

What Did Obama Know, and When Did He Know It? Chicago Democrat Machine Revealed

http://www.thoughtsongod.com/?p=1936



I intend to get to this, but may not for another day or two! It should be "newsworthy" for awhile.

Anonymous said...

Supremes to Wrottenewski: DENIED.

Another frivolous lawsuit expunged from our justice system.

Jordanes said...

However, nowhere to be found is it stated that the actual case is denied. I.O. expects it and other cases to go to the "Cases Pending" file, until the Electoral College vote is certified (or not, theoretically) by Congress.

True, Wrotnowski’s online docket report does not say his case was denied. Rather, his application for a stay or injunction preventing the Electoral College from voting today was denied. But nowhere to be found in the docket report is any application petitioning for a writ of certoriari – that is, a request that the Supreme Court take his appeal. Could that explain why the Supreme Court has not denied certoriari to Wrotnowski: because he hasn’t asked them to accept his appeal? Did he forget to file an application petitioning for a writ of certoriari?? Obviously they can’t deny an appeal that hasn’t even been filed, and the record only shows an application for a stay or injunction, not an application for certoriari. That’s what was referred to conference on Friday, and that’s what was denied today.

PURGEQUEEN said...

I have picked up this guy's comments on two blogs.I copied and pasted them. There is an air of inside knowledge...or maybe I'm grasping at straws.See what you think:

Berg's case is awaiting distribution to conference, which should occur on January 9.

Wrotnowski has not filed a petition for a writ of certiorari, so no further action will be taken on this case unless one is filed.

Lightfoot's application for a stay was denied by Justice Kennedy. An order will issue shortly. Lightfoot has not filed for a writ of certiorari, so no further action will be taken on this case unless the application is refiled with another justice or a petition for a writ is filed.

-Lawdawg
December 15, 2008 4:17 PM

Lawdawg // December 15, 2008 at 5:06 pm

Berg’s case will be distributed for conference, but not until January 9.

Wrotnowski did not file a petition for a writ of certiorari, so no further action will be taken on his case unless a petition is filed.

Lightfoot’s petition for a stay was denied by Justice Kennedy - an order will issue shortly. To date, Lightfoot has not filed a petition for a writ of certiorari, so no further action will be taken on that case unless a petition is filed.

-Lawdawg

Phillybits said...

Maybe ya'll need to convince Larry Johnson to release the whitey tape and Sammy Korir to release the Michelle tapes and the Imam documents.

Yeah! I bet if you can get those out, you'll REALLY be able to stop Obama then!

Heh

Madcap said...

Is it time to move on yet? While everyone is chasing his birth certificate,there is a more important issue that is not getting enough play on blogs.
"What Did Obama Know, and When Did He Know It? Chicago Democrat Machine Revealed."
http://www.thoughtsongod.com/?p=1936#http://www.thoughtsongod.com/?p=1936

Arlen Williams said...

Purgequen - I heard the Webmaster for Orly Taitz state, late this evening that Justice Kennedy has not denied the Lightfoot case, today. He went on to say that this was a nuisance rumor. I would not trust Lawdawg's posting.

Madcap - There are federal investigators and state investigators and a flood of media on the Fitzgerald investigations. It should be covered (see the I.O. sidebar). However, the the media maintains a thick, black cloud over the natural born Citizen criteria and this major, Constitutional crisis.

Granted the above, the decision of which one to promulgate for me is easy.

Jordanes - Could that explain why the Supreme Court has not denied certoriari to Wrotnowski: because he hasn’t asked them to accept his appeal?

That is a great question. It does not help that both Leo Donofrio and Cort Wrotnowski have seemed to go dark over the weekend and this last day.

Jordanes said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Jordanes said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Jordanes said...

I heard the Webmaster for Orly Taitz state, late this evening that Justice Kennedy has not denied the Lightfoot case, today. He went on to say that this was a nuisance rumor. I would not trust Lawdawg's posting.

I'm inclined to believe that Kennedy declined Lightfoot's application. Lightfoot had asked Justice Kennedy to stop the Electoral College from voting "pending the filing and disposition of a petition for a writ of certiorari." But the Electors voted today, with no order from Justice Kennedy telling them to hold their horses. That can only mean that Lightfoot's application was denied.

Madcap said...

Arlen Williams,
Sure it's getting coverage. That's because 55% of people think he's not telling the truth. Very few people feel the birth angle has any legs. When I post on the birth issue I get two hits on the articles, when I post on Blagogate, people come to read. Sometimes in the art of war you have to go with the flow. I'm glad that so many people have put time and energy in the birth issue, but truly, it's time to move on. I posted many articles on the issue, but it's not going to fly so I'm letting it go unless something of importance happens.

ObamaBirth said...

As I read the official document from the SCOTUS, it simply says disposition of "orders in pending cases" which is different from other announcements "certiorari denied"

Which means, the Donofrio and the Cort cases are still pending.

Do not interpret what need not be interpreted. It is not denied certiorari. The denial was for the stay in the PENDING CASES.

Jordanes said...

But how can the court deny certiorari if the petitioner has not yet requested it? In that sense the cases are still pending, since the petitioners have not yet done anything else that the Justices can act on. . . . but if the petitioners don’t apply for certiorari, nothing further will happen in these cases, which would mean that the cases are practically dead and over with. One of them could file another application for stay of Obama's inauguration next month, but we all know how likely it is that the Supremes will step in then.

Anonymous said...

This can only be challenged between January 8-20.

That is the only window. If successfully challenged, Joe Biden will be acting President until such time as Obama can furnish documented proof of his qualification.

This is fair and reasonable to Obama. If he is qualified, it will be the simplest of acts to prove it, like you and I applying for a passport.

What's the big deal?

Arlen Williams said...

Jordanes said...
But how can the court deny certiorari if the petitioner has not yet requested it? In that sense the cases are still pending, since the petitioners have not yet done anything else that the Justices can act on. . . . but if the petitioners don’t apply for certiorari, nothing further will happen in these cases, which would mean that the cases are practically dead and over with. One of them could file another application for stay of Obama's inauguration next month, but we all know how likely it is that the Supremes will step in then.
December 16, 2008 2:41 PM


Looks accurate, but since a federal court has already determined that they have no jurisdiction until after Congressional certification (1/8) this should be another window cracked open, for the little litigants with standing to try to crawl into the high court -- sort of a reverse burglary, trying to bring the U.S. Constitution back into the house.

Anonymous said...

He has already admitted to being born under the Crown of England, because his father was a British subject. This automatically means he doesn't qualify to be President. The framers of the constitution just finished a war with England to win our independence. They didn't want anyone loyal to the crown to be president and commander in chief. That usurper could turn our military against the American people. Therefore only a natural born citizen was allowed to be President.Not a person with allegiance to any other country but the United States of America.

Ted said...

EASY WAY TO MAKE SURE OBAMA NEVER GETS INAUGURATED (READ CAREFULLY):–

Since the Supreme Court has now prevented itself from acknowledging the question of whether Barack H. Obama is or is not an Article II “natural born citizen” based on the Kenyan/British citizenship of Barack Obama’s father at the time of his birth (irrespective of whether Barack Obama is deemed a “citizen” born in Hawaii or otherwise) as a prerequisite to qualifying to serve as President of the United States under the Constitution — the Court having done so three times and counting, first before the Nov 4 general election and twice before the Dec 15 vote of the College of Electors — it would seem appropriate, if not necessary, for all Executive Branch departments and agencies to secure advance formal advice from the United States Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel as to how to respond to expected inquiries from federal employees who are pledged to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States” as to whether they are governed by laws, regulations, orders and directives issued under Mr. Obama during such periods that said employees, by the weight of existing legal authority and prior to a decision by the Supreme Court, believe in good faith that Mr. Obama is not an Article II “natural born citizen”.

Anonymous said...

Question: Does the United States have one courageous honest Senator?
Answer: All should be honest and courages.
Reasons: The were elected to do the peoples business in all states.
The are paid by the citizen tax payers of our country.
The House and the Judiciary also have the same responsiblities and they all took oaths that stated that they would do the peoples business.

Jim G said...

Yes, the Constitution of the United States of America is the supreme law of the land.

Mr. Obama appears not to be constututionally qualified to lawfully hold the office of President of the United States. Even, Bill Clinton hinted as to Obamas's disqualification in one of Clinton's pre-democratic nomination television interviews.

Do We, as Sovereigns, have any legal obligation to acknowledge, support or recognize the unlawful and void Presidency of an unlawfully anointed and elected alien?

According to the United States Constitution, the answer is no.

Our Rights and Constututions become meaningless unless We explicitly claim and exercise those Laws/Rights.

One specifc reason the Constitution is often ignored by politicians, judges and other government officials is that the Constitution limits their lawful powers or authority.

Unforutunately, as we know, many government officials feel that they are above the law.

Unless or until, we the people, hold them accountable, then those goverment officals who violate their oaths of office and constitutional law are indeed above the law.

The Constitution was composed and ratified to protect the people from the government.

It was a brilliantly composed Document of positive American ideals scribed as fundamental and binding Law.

Corrupt politicians will surely wish to violate or disregard that which limits their powers.

The spirit and intent of the Constitution has never been so important to a free people as now.



"These statements are based upon my personal opinions as expressed under my inalienable rights as guarateed by the 1st and 14th Amendments to the U.S. Constitution."

Anonymous said...

hahaha keep wasting your time

You will never defeat our conspiracy to install a foreigner into the White House, we are simply too smart and too powerful

Soon, our communist conspiracy shall destroy everything that you believe in, MWA HA HA!!!

Anonymous said...

DICTATOR OBAMA, LAST AMERICAN PRESIDENT, TO TAKE OATH ON ABRAHAM LINCOLN’S BIBLE
As unbelievable as it seems, our beloved America has been raped, disgraced, violated, and handed to the people who hate her most. The most horrible realizations of the daily tragedy we are experiencing are the perpetrators of this unthinkable crime are the very people who hold sacred positions of the highest public trust. I often lose sleep trying to understand why judges, Senators, Congressmen, politicians and the 9 snakes of the Supreme Court would betray us they way they have. Do they think they are so powerful they are immune from accountability and ultimately penalty? Have they given up on the principles and laws of our Great Constitution? Are they so jaded they truly consider Obama so great he is above the law? Why did they do this to America? Why, why, why I have asked the great silence repeatedly since last July?

There is no doubt that in some way some how if this issue over Obama's eligibility isn't resolved to the satisfaction of the rule of law of the Constitution, there will be more than just riots if the election were to be overturned on behalf of our constitutional law. In spite of the multiple law suits demanding proof of his eligibility to be president under the law of the land, Obama ruthlessly allows this single issue to fester and grow, waste millions of dollars in legal fees and judicial costs, and is willing permit violence and bloodshed that is certain to happen sooner or later. He also is willing and knowing to permit the final destruction to the Constitution so as to become world dictator. There are of large number of people who are guilty of participating in the same unbelievable evil Obama plot.

It seems to me that the strategy of Obama and his conspirators is to be sworn into office on January 20, 2009. Immediately take control of the White House and the government with his strategically named cabinet and appointees. Then he will take over the military, declare martial law, declare the US Constitution obsolete and end the Republic of the United States. With just a little more manipulation, he will change his title from President to some other political title that will in essence mean "DICTATOR". D I C T A T O R O B A M A. What army do the American people have to defend them? Who and what has enough money, military might, patriotic conviction, experience, or fearlessness to stop this? If this seems like a fantasy of a delusional old lady, then think. Look how far Obama has gotten already. WE are only 23 days from his CORONATION.

January 20, 2009 will be the last day of America. Barry Sotoero, the silver plated turd, takes the oath of the United States Presidency. Barry Sotoero will become the last President of the United States. Hence forward, freedom of speech will be denied. The laws of Sharia will become the law of the land. Christians, Jews, and infidels will be persecuted. There will be only two classes of people—rich and poor. Women will eventually have to cover their faces and wear berkas. Never did this former Beatnic/Hippie ever imagine this day would come. Thank God, my years on the planet are short. May God have mercy on our grandchildren!

Anonymous said...

The above person is exhibiting symptoms of ODS (Obama Derangement Syndrome).

RedHatty said...

The Electoral Vote from ONLY 24 STATES has been received to date. There are not enough in to give the presidency to Obama

see

http://www.rayelan.com/cgi-bin/members/forum.cgi?read=10067

Anonymous said...

OH HECK! If Ed Hale can find Big Foot you know darn well he can find OBAMA'S COLB!

Arlen Williams said...

The COLB is the monster that factcheck.org has bagged.