No Border Security without Amnesty - Obama to Sen. Jon Kyl

Update, 6/22/2010 - Don't miss the second video in this miniseries, "Border Security for Amnesty, the Prequel (2004)"

For the latest on the motives of Barack Obama and his "transnational progressive" allies, such as George Soros and Maurice Strong, regarding Mexico and the plans for North America under global governance, read the words and heed this video. I will likely add a few more comments, or post another entry about it, soon.

Video - Sen. Kyl: 'Obama Says No Border Security without Amnesty'
by Connie Hair, Human Events, 6/20/2010

In a stunning revelation at an Arizona town hall meeting this past Friday, Republican Senator Jon Kyl told his constituents that President Obama privately insisted that he will not secure the border until amnesty for illegal aliens passes first. According to Kyl, Obama argued that Democrats would lose their bargaining chips for any type of amnesty if the government beefs up its presence on the chaotic border. “The problem is,” Obama allegedly told Kyl, "If we secure the border, then you all won’t have any reason to support comprehensive immigration reform.”

6/19 video: 'Kyl says Obama said no border security for political reasons'

Transcript (at 3:21):

SEN. JON KYL: I met with the president in the Oval Office, just the two of us… Here’s what the president said. “The problem is,” he said, "If we secure the border, then you all won’t have any reason to support comprehensive immigration reform.”

[gasps from the audience]

KYL: In other words they’re holding it hostage. They don’t want to secure the border unless and until it is combined with comprehensive immigration reform. I explained, “You and I have an obligation to secure the border. That’s an obligation. It also has some potentially positive benefits. You don’t have to have comprehensive immigration to secure the border, but you have to have a secure border to get comprehensive immigration reform. You may be surprised, maybe you don’t think that there’d be any more incentive, but I’m not so sure that that’s true. In any event, it doesn’t matter we’re supposed to secure the border.”

That’s why this is being done. They want to get something in return for doing their duty. And that’s—

AUDIENCE MEMBER: Chicago politics.

KYL: Yeah.

H/T: Scott McKay, The Hayride

Since this is a brief post by Connie Hair, I decided to include all of it. Please visit the source. I.O. is monitoring Ms. Hair's reports from Congress and suggests them (link).

And yes, I would like to put this together with some of the other facts we know about transnational progressives' plans and Obama's recent doings regarding the Mexican illegal invasion and let you see if you reach any conclusions. Back about this in a bit, but I'll end this post with this question:

Is such gross refusal to uphold and abide by our Constitution, and enforce U.S. law, an impeachable level of misdemeanor? - AW