Orly Taitz Watch - More Destruction of Her Own Cases? Updated with Documentation

Judge David Carter ruled that the latest filing of Orly Taitz in Barnett, et.al., v. Obama may not be supplemented, as Tatiz had apparently intended, without the permission of the defense (the Department of Justice, oddly enough). This was their response to Obama's motion to dismiss, lauded by some for its eloquence as it rambled far beyond the points of the dismissal motion. When the right hand flourishes, watch what the left hand does.

This means that while the response of Orly Tatiz, DDS is apparently incomplete, it must stand. The umpteenth harmful error by Taitz? Merely a set of errors, or worse?

This is separate from the response given by Gary Kreep, the attorney for Markham Robinson and Wiley Drake in this same case.

Judge Carter's order is linked, here. I.O. hopes to have time to further address this mess, today.

Update ~ Do you think these concerns are wrong? Do you think that Tatiz' response hit the nails on the head, or that it addressed the motion to dismiss weakly, point for point?

Feel free to compare Orly Taitz' response, to that of Gary Kreep, to Obama's motion to dismiss -- documentation:

9/23, KEYES v OBAMA - 70 - MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER by Judge David O. Carter: DENYING REQUEST TO FILE

9/21, KEYES v OBAMA - 69 - OPPOSITION to MOTION to Dismiss Case AND MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES (from Orly Taitz)

9/18, KEYES v OBAMA - 67 - OPPOSITION to MOTION to Dismiss Case AND MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES (from Gary Kreep)

9/4, Keyes|Barnett GOV MOTION TO DISMISS - 56

Update 2/25 - This comment received. Let deciders decide.

Professor Jorgen said...

@Arlen,
She wasn't indicating that she would ammend her response to the motion to dismiss but indicating that she was going to ammend her complaint again. So that says nothing to the completeness of her response to this particular motion, they are separate in that respect.

September 25, 2009 11:53 AM

And, if you would like to hear why Markham Robinson fired Orly Taitz, listen to the first hour of "The Awakening," this past Monday. It is archived and available by clicking here.

Orly Taitz Accused of Suborning Perjury for Barnett v. Obama - Updated Including Affidavit, etc.

This is the breaking news mentioned last night in Investigating Obama and The Awakening. Below is a post by Larry Sinclair, from his blog, "...on all things Obama," about what he indicates he was asked by Dr. Taitz, to do.

Affidavit to be Filed with Federal Court in Santa Ana Today

I have tried to stay neutral in the cases of Orly Taitz and have even tolerated the attacks from her and her supporters. I will no longer. Orly Taitz needs to be held accountable and responsible for her actions and her actions need to be made public.

I tired to be as polite as possible when explaining how I was contacted by Orly Taitz and what transpired on September 7, 2009 in personal meetings with her. Seems Taitz and her supporters have decided they need to engage in attacks and making false statements in a chat room by the name of "The Tavern of the Ghostfighters" and other sites to try and keep up the FRAUD that I am now convinced Orly Taitz is engaged in.

Allow me to correct one thing being claimed by Taitz and her marks: Orly Taitz at no time was in any airport with me and never once yelled at me anywhere. Now to make such claims is a bit telling as to her motives.

Later today I will be faxing to the United States District Court in Santa Ana, California as well as to the U.S. Attorney's Office an Affidavit informing Judge Carter that on September 7, 2009 Orly Taitz did knowingly and intentionally ask me to appear before his Court on September 8, 2009 and give knowingly false testimony for the purpose of obtaining "expedited discovery," and to gain publicity for my book.

I have made it clear from my first going public on YouTube January 17, 2008 that I will stand by the truth and would not allow anyone to misrepresent my statements nor would I be dishonest in any way. Orly Taitz as an officer of the court engaged in behavior that if allowed to go unquestioned will harm any and all valid claims made on Barack Obama's eligibility now or in the future. In the words of an Orly Taitz supporter, "She can't lie and ask others to lie at the same time accusing Obama of lying. Lets get to the truth but we have to be honest in doing so."

The sworn affidavit will be provided to other web sites for posting in ifs PDF format for downloading by anyone who wants a copy.

The affidavit (loading may take a couple minutes):
090915 LWS Affidavit Reducedpx

http://www.scribd.com/doc/19784205/090915-LWS-Affidavit-Reducedpx

Note received from Mr. Sinclair:

Typo in paragraph 18 of the affidavit, Should have been "...I emailed Orly Taitz and informed her I would NOT be appearing..."

Please accept my apologies and post a note as to what the correct wording should have been. These people will be trying to use it against me and I will notify the US Attorney and the Court to the typo.

Larry Sinclair's fax cover sheet (click to enlarge):


Larry Sinclair's mail to the U.S. District Court involved (Sinclair explained, they do not take faxes):


I.O. repeats the call: do you also know of significantly unethical or even illegal behavior on the part of Orly Taitz, as it pertains to the movement for constitutional justice regarding Barack Obama, by the constitutional standards for natural born Citizenship? If so, please email arlenwilliams@yahoo.com. I want to help you.

We the People of the United States of America are owed competence, honesty, and allegiance, in this matter. Please see immediately prior I.O. article on Orly Taitz and Barnett v. Obama and its comments, for more reality.