Saturday, May 8, 2010

Want to Understand Wall Street Crises Before the Next One? Then, Look Again at 2008 - Please!

Updated - Don't even think about not watching this video

Question:
What caused Bear Stearns, then Lehman Brothers to fail on Wall Street, at their appointed times, as the the mortgage meltdown "progressed?"

Clue: It wasn't someone who couldn't tell where the "M" and "B" keys are, on a keyboard.

Answer: Peruse these videos, produced by Judd Bagley, of the blog DeepCapture, where he posted the first of these videos as an item by the same name, on September 15th, 2009.

Hedge Funds and the Global Economic Meltdown - 1/3
:


Hedge Funds and the Global Economic Meltdown - 2/3
:


Hedge Funds and the Global Economic Meltdown - 3/3:


Mind you, this is not the whole story; do not let anyone fool you. And I.O. neither confirms nor denies the author's implications regarding particular individuals. And we sure don't trust Michael Moore to present the story, straight (mentioned at the end, but you heard that if you viewed it, right?). But, the mega-criminals are out there still. And they will continue to steal away but not to Jesus, our livelihoods

We would not make the mistake of assuming this was not very effectively connected with the other factors, including the the Revised Community Reinvestment (what better euphemism for Marxism?) Act fomenting the creation of the mortgage bubble and giving a green-light to mortgage abuse, for the entire industry -- with epidemic failure furnished by the toxic mortgage bundling system. (By the way, Dodd/Obama financial "reform" proposes the dispersion and bundling of bad risks in Wall Street security derivatives, too.)

Also, we observe the work of Very Big Money (VBM) behind the various manipulations involved -- VBM with a successful track record. Remember economy wrecker, George Soros, who admits he saw the bubble burst coming in "August of '07" and that he made money in it, is primarily a manager of the VBM of even fatter cats, including numerous central bank players and yes the name, "Rothschild" is included. And don't forget Soros' globalist, bring-down-America pals, Herb and Marion Sandler, who have so directly contributed, not only to help the time bomb go off in September '08, while making a malicious fortune in the process, but who have continued to work so closely with Soros and with Obama's legal and training client, ACORN. Just a glimpse into the VBM, there.

And, then, of course there were, are, and will be, the works of the folks in government, including Barney Frank providing cover for Fannie Mae and Chuck Schumer's work with Herb and Marion's "Center for Responsible Lending," including providing an apparent catalyst for IndyMac's failure. (Schumer might not like B. Frank getting top billing here, but he seems very used to being a neo-Marxist mover and shaker behind the titular one.) And of course, Franklin Delano Raines' fannie may just be riding where it needs to be sent, after his trickery is finally dealt with properly.

And, of course there was Red China loving, Congress manipulating Hank Paulson -- and his young pal, Timmy Geithner (so far removed from it all, as kid chairman of the Federal Reserve of the distant hamlet of New York). Hank's boss, Bush-43? Just don't know. Do you? Feel free to comment or email, if you do.

And Timmy's boss? Mr. Hang Back and Watch, No Drama Obama? Wouldn't you like to read the text that came through that guy's Blackberry? Or, that keeps coming? You do remember what Sen. Jim DeMint told us a few days ago, about exactly who nixed Sen. Blanche Lincoln's transparency verbiage, for the new Obamafinance bill? Yeah, same guy: BHO. Go back and watch, if you like: "THE GREATEST SCANDAL IN MODERN HISTORY - Treason in Process." Transparency gets in the way of manipulation.

And have you watched the final version of the eye-opening Autumn-2008 video, "Burning Down the House?" And did you not read James Simpson's article, "Barack Obama and the Strategy of Manufactured Crisis," in that nostalgic September of 2008? Or, subsequently? Time flies, when we're having crises. - AW

Addendum 5/14/2010 - Also one must remember the news which Mike Huckabee broke, during this time, that a Wall Street specialist informed him that during four or five weeks in a row, tremendous selling pressure was put upon the Street, on Fridays, apparently in order to thwart rallies and make bad news the order of those weeks' summations in the news.

please, please, don't waste them

Jack Cashill, author of the new book, Popes & Bankers, a Cultural History of Credit & Debit, From Aristotle to AIG, will be our guest this Monday, 9pm ET, on "The Awakening" - linked here.
The netradio widget will be posted in I.O. and linked at Sentinel Radio.
Jack can give us an important education about banking and pesky morality, before and after Mayer and Nathan Rothschild.

More about the Wall Street manipulation of Thursday, 5/6/2010, from Gerald Celente, here
...and about the collapse he predicts for later this year.


photo source unknown

Friday, May 7, 2010

Lt. Col. Terry Lakin & Attorney Paul Jensen Badgered by Anderson Cooper

Look at Anderson Cooper, the CNN presidential debate question stacker ("gays in the military, gays in the military") trying to go all Edward R. Murrow on steroids! Journalistic protocol was broken from the very beginning, as Anderson furiously badgered Lakin, instead of allowing his attorney to speak for him on matters before trial.


Cooper surrounds and sieges Lakin and Jensen, 360

No full answer was allowed concerning the true natural born Citizen requirements. The marxstream media must defend their Marxist messiah. Cooper throws his body over Obama. Thud!

Anderson was prepared to the max. It would have been much too harmful to merely ask objective questions, with that platform. Anderson had to try for the Mike Tyson 1st Round knockout, as he chewed Lakin's ears. Perhaps he worked it out with lawyers in touch with the dark side. (Oh-oh, was that a racist comment? I plead my innocence! in case anyone familiar with "tea-bagging" is reading.) He even knew how to frame the question to beg the question, attempting to slur over the difference between a general citizen and an nbC, and dismissing any objective consideration of the matter of who might have placed those birth announcements in the papers and what obvious reasons there would be. (And have you checked the hundreds of emails you must have gotten by now about that, Bill O'Reilly and Michelle Malkin?)

Jensen and Lakin got some hard core practice in battlefield debate with a veteran Obama protagonist and propagandist loaded for bear. Gotta give him credit, Couric v. Palin can't touch that.

Gerald Celente Holds to Prediction of 2010 Collapse

If you have read the "Essential Articles" in the I.O. Sidebar, you may have an idea of where he is coming from.

It's not one guy making a little mistake. No. The system is so rigged -- this is what we're trying to say. When things are going on that people have no idea about. Oh, they call it a "fat finger that hit a 'B' instead of an 'M,'" come on, you know, let's grow up about this. It's bigger than that. The systems are collapsing.
And anybody believes that if anyone's in control that's going to save the day, they're going to go down with the ship of state.
More on this coming today, which explains key megacriminal elements of what happened to us in 2008. Be sure to see it. "The beast" (the present one) is cannibalizing itself, by the direct intent of a few. OK... more than "a few." - AW

UPDATE -
Want Clues about This Wall Street Crisis? And the Next One? Then, Look at the Last One - Now!

Thursday, May 6, 2010

Franklin Graham vs. the Marxofascist Insurrection's Unholy Alliance

Franklin Graham, Honorary Chairman of the National Day of Prayer Task Force, 2010, tells the gospel truth...


...but he need not be so pessimistic about our future, if Americans are willing to wake up and "repent," i.e., turn to the truth, and yield ourselves to it (hence, the word under-stand). That is how to truly become aware and strong. And people who do this will fulfill the responsibilities with which God charges them. Those who are Sovereign Citizens of America will carry out our responsibilities to govern our nation and influence our culture. For example, that is what you are doing, right?

But you know this is no anti-Christ we are facing, Franklin. Not enough talent. Of course, the spirits involved are anti-Christ; very much so. And Barack Obama knows he should not outwardly oppose Christianity. That has been tried, before. Rather, a good neo-Marxist will wear sheep's not wolf's garb, while he: 1. changes the message, 2. psychologically ostracizes those who "cling" to the true message, and 3. exerts a controlling influence over those who receive his "gospel."

Thus, Obama has repeatedly asserted that, "our individual salvation depends on collective salvation." That is a tenet of Marxism, including its Christian co-opting arm of liberation theology, but it is adversarial to the salvation which is offered by Jesus Christ directly, to every single one of us, through His ultimate sacrifice. Someone should warn Barack Obama that it is not only very harmful but very dangerous, to come between God Incarnate and the individual whose freedom He bought forever, by His own blood.

I just called evil anything that intervenes against the work of the Holy Spirit of God, directly dealing with any person, as He testifies of: 1. God's sinless holiness, 2. man's being lost in sin, alienated from God, and 3. Jesus' offering us one lovingly specific way back to God. One of many such interferences is the competing ideology of Islam. Shortly after 9/11, Franklin Graham cited Islam as evil. There is the divisiveness of which he is accused. And so, he was disinvited from today's (Christian) National Day of Prayer ceremony, at the Pentagon.

Ideological divisiveness appears to be a grave sin, in the irrationally truthless world of relativism and cultural Marxism. That is okay, though -- truly. Jesus himself warned He came to bring just this sword of perfect divisiveness, between the singular truth and every denial of it. He even let us know that the world would hate those who joined Him in proclaiming the truth, just as it hated Him.

Unlike Barack Obama's Department of Defense, you see, God's Son allows the freedom to hear God, if we wish, and to receive His grace, if we choose.
Therefore whoever confesses Me before men, him I will also confess before My Father who is in heaven. But whoever denies Me before men, him I will also deny before My Father who is in heaven.

Do not think that I came to bring peace on earth. I did not come to bring peace but a sword. For I have come to ‘set a man against his father, a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law’; and ‘a man’s enemies will be those of his own household.’ He who loves father or mother more than Me is not worthy of Me. And he who loves son or daughter more than Me is not worthy of Me. And he who does not take his cross and follow after Me is not worthy of Me. He who finds his life will lose it, and he who loses his life for My sake will find it.


He who receives you receives Me, and he who receives Me receives Him who sent Me. He who receives a prophet in the name of a prophet shall receive a prophet’s reward. And he who receives a righteous man in the name of a righteous man shall receive a righteous man’s reward.

- Jesus Christ, Matthew 10:32-43
Submitted to you on this Christian National Day of Prayer, May the Sixth, in the Year of our Lord, Two Thousand and Ten. - AW

Monday, May 3, 2010

'Freaking' Around, Saturday Night and the Latest Stains on the Presidency's Shorts

a thousand words and a few thousand frames of "the president"

Looking over the video, I find it odd -- Barack Obama's stand-up routine before fellow guests last Saturday, last May Day night, at the White House Correspondents' Dinner.

Firstly, it is not enough that he found it very humorous on the day Joe Biden dropped the F-bomb at the signing of Obamacare, as they presented their administration's "Big F'ing Deal." Biden related Obama was "laughin' like the devil" and saying it was "the best thing" about the ceremony. Now, he has whispered that line into the microphones, himself, granted he said "big freaking deal," and so properly he even articulated the -ing suffix with precision.

This is the United States "President" hitting us with it again, in a supposedly comedic address, recounting this stinking little stain upon his own administration's alleged accomplishment like the guy who elbows you in the ribs, with a "Get it? Get it? Did-ja get it, huh? Did-ja get it?" And it comes to mind, this is the same individual whose accredited adolescent poetry about "Pop" scribed something about "...the same amber stain on his shorts that I have on mine and makes me smell his smell coming from me," whatever... exactly... that means. Alrighty, then.

And trying to understand, I have to remember Obama's issuing the middle finger flip-off at both Hillary Clinton and John McCain, once again, in speeches, those during his campaign for the United States of America's most responsible office.

Secondly, on that very day when the National Enquirer's tabloid buzz finally begins to "brake" into the consciousnesses of the world the overripe story of apparent Obama mistress, Vera Baker (and the Obamas must know that) look at Barack Obama's face, when he speaks of his wife "...the lovely first lady..." Michelle. What do you see there? A genuine affection and appreciation that a husband has for his wife?

And when, in one peculiar breath, he uses both a reference in principle to that very love for one's wife, plus his own "natural born Citizen" problem -- for a joke -- look at his face. What do you see? Looking at it numerous times, he does not appear to be enjoying the joke he tells, at all. And it seems to become a weak attempt at bagging and canning these scandals, together.

See for yourself. The flippancy coming out of the mouth of that hard, cold face went over very well with the audience, though -- with that audience -- White House correspondents and their friends. Which is odder, the president or the journalists? I understand it is supposed to be humorous and they are laughing. At what, again?

Here are these early moments of his act, last Saturday.
  • the fleeting exhibit of Obama's face after his first mention of Michelle Obama and during the audience's approval of it, comes 32 seconds in
  • the referential f-bomb joke comes right after and here, by his extra pause for a chuckle and grin, he really does enjoy that moment
  • the odd love-and-birth certificate comment accompanied by Obama's even odder facial expressions arrive at the 4 minute mark

But what of all this delight in crudeness and grim dismissal of the sublime? Again, I have to tell myself it is all appropriate, really. Cut him some slack. This is just how a boy who is raised Marxist and taken repeatedly by "Gramps" to a brothel bar to visit his communist mentor and apparent pedophile, "Uncle Frank" (ostensibly, the aforementioned, "Pop") ...well, this is how the kid is supposed to behave when he grows up to be president.

And I remember, this is the Barack Obama who tried to get sex-ed with perverse "progressive" mores taught in Illinois public schools, beginning at Kindergarten (link-1, link-2).

This is the man who appointed the unfortunate Kevin Jennings to be his "Safe Schools Czar" -- the man who passed off homosexual statutory rape as no "big f'ing deal,"

This is the man who has defamed America, in speeches overseas and before the United Nations and who demeans the Sovereign Citizens of our republic by his bows to foreign leaders.

But to really put it in perspective, this is the man who has intentionally and determinedly worked according to the Marx-Trotsky-Gramsci-Davis-Alinsky-Cloward-Piven playbook, to weaken America morally, economically, and militarily, in The Great American Bring-Down necessary for the onset of global Marxofascism. Oh, that's right. He's that guy.

Last Saturday's f-joke is that elbow in the ribs about was is beyond crude in this picture. A delight in defilement seems to want to come out, under the spotlight. What goes on in this person's soul? Just what childhood -- and adulthood has gotten him this way, to enjoy the sneaking of the vulgar and the filthy into the very times he is before microphones and spotlights, in the roles of candidate, then President of the United States?

When someone holds secrets of malice, a part of his heart can desire the glory of it, the credit for what he conceals. Looking back we can see that serial criminals, from the carvings of Jack the Ripper, to the teeth prints of Ted Bundy, to the extravagant manifesto of Ted Kaczynski, like to express their intentions and leave their signatures.

Deep inside, in places Obama "doesn't talk about in his parties," just how much loathing of the morality and sensibility concomitant with America's authentic nature does this man nurture and pet? How much of it lusts for expression? He is to be pitied, but he is the occupant of the White House. Keep watching.
- AW

More about Barry and "Pop," from author, Jack Cashill, linked here
Mr. Cashill will be our guest on "The Awakening," this coming Monday, May 10, 9-11pm ET

graphic from the University of South Carolina Library

Saturday, May 1, 2010

May Day 2010, Finding the Authentic in a Day of Distress

"Burying the lead" again today; please keep reading

May Day - May Day. Here are some things that are happening, or have happened, upon this day.

Wiccans, according to their pagan and occult history are celebrating the "Beltane" rites of Spring. Further, it is rumored that upon the evening of May first, Satan worshipers practice initiation rites.

Whatever has or has not happened with this, since, on May 1, 1776, Adam Wieshaupt formed the "Order of Perfectibilists," founding the Illuminati.

Communists and other Marxists are practicing their annual day of demonstration and whatever celebration they can muster.

The cause of open borders and amnesty for illegal aliens is being protested in numerous American cities (I have heard, seventeen). By the way, I am not an authority about the reasons behind the celebration of Cinco de Mayo, but I have been informed that date commemorates an event in Mexican history that is not really, very significant. However, it is interesting to note that May 5, 1818 is the birth date of Karl Marx. Something to look into.

Barack Obama is, as I type, giving a speech which may become notable in Obamalogist history, in which he is selling the idea of changing America from our foundational order. He is decrying the use of words such as "socialists," "Soviets," "fascists," and "right-wing nut" (he inserted a slur against Constitutionalists among actual, academic words used against him, in subtle propagandistic fashion). Have you noticed that Democrat politicos do not use the words "Marxism" and "Communism" when they refer to this -- and that Republican who do, are disciplined by party leaders? More on the use of terms later, I think.

In Obama's address to University of Michigan graduates, he falsely characterized those who seek Constitutional restoration and equal, not social justice as "against government;" obvious agitprop legerdemain.

Wait! Here is this article's "lead." In Washington, D.C., again as I type, there is a massive prayer meeting, "a cry to God in a nation in distress." You may go to mayday2010.org in order to investigate this particular event -- and you may go directly to the Bible and to God in prayer, too. And tomorrow, you may even choose to go to a Bible-based church which advocates that Christians obey God by carrying out our full set of responsibilities, including that of "Caesar," as the Sovereign Citizens in this nation established by God. Do you know of any in driving distance? We... we are America's essential "leaders... who must give an account," and who "do not bear the sword for nothing," after all. But it all starts with hearing the Word of God and our prayer in return.

Perhaps the video of this May Day 2010 prayer meeting will remain available after the event, for your perusal and perhaps, participation.

I will also post about (and likely attend) a prayer retreat for America, Wilderness Outcry, scheduled to occur in Missouri, this June 14-18. And I.O. will also refer to yesterday's Glenn Beck episode, archived and streaming, hopefully -- and it's expose' on "The Father of the American Revolution," who doesn't happen to be named Washington, but Adams, and not John, actually, but Samuel Adams. Please watch "and tell your friends."

Investigating Obama after all, is not just about the problem, but also, the solution. For example, last December, on "The Awakening," we featured important information about participation in precinct-level electoral action. There will be more posts to make about the solution, some in I.O.

And I.O. may update this post, one way or another, but has to know when to quit;
the items above are stuff for volumes.

Friday, April 30, 2010

Obamafinance to 'Require Banks to Track and Report Personal Checking Accounts to Feds'

Viewing the Obama regime from I.O's perch, the bill most central to their globalist Marxofascist goals may be the Obamafinance bill, from Dodd & Company. I invite you to examine this new item from BigGovernment.com. There must be every bit as much mega-buzz about this attack on America (and about Cap and Trade) as there was about Obamacare. Sovereign Citizens must have the truth put in front of their faces. -- AW
Bailout Bill Would Require Banks to Track and Report Personal Checking Accounts to Feds
by Capitol Confidential

It’s amazing to watch the civil libertarians hide when Democrats propose the most sweeping intrusions of privacy in generations. In addition to the litany of bad policies contained in the Dodd Financial Reform bill is this nugget on pages 1039-1040. In short, it extends government reach to every deposit account of every citizen.
Subtitle G of the Dodd discussion draft bill requires that records be maintained and reported “for each branch, automated teller machine at which deposits are accepted, and other deposit taking service facility with respect to any financial institution, the financial institution shall maintain a record of the number and dollar amounts of deposit accounts of customers.”

What’s worse, banks will be required to submit these records to the new super regulatory agency called the Consumer Financial Protection Agency (page 1041). The CFPA will be allowed to use this information for any purpose “as permitted by law” under CFPA rules—rules set by CFPA themselves.

So, lets get this straight—the law requires banks to snoop on its customers MOST PERSONAL INFORMATION and submit it to another government agency so it can be used anyway the CFPA see’s fit.

continued....

Crime Inc. - Behind the Chicago Climate Exchange - Glenn Beck Expounds


...and gives us a tip in the event of his untimely demise: for the reason and the culprits, look to those figures to which he pointed, in his Thursday, 4/29 program [ed., or those he is not reporting on, but who are pulling the strings even behind them]



This time, if you have not caught it and wish to see this "Crime, Inc." program, you can view it at Patriots Network. Go on, we'll still be here.

And there, Beck's gems include...
  1. that Internet regulation lurks somewhere in the Obamafinance regulation bill... or is it the Cap and Trade bill? is there even a Cap and Trade bill to read, anywhere? I mean by the People?
  2. rubbing it in that no one in Congress is investigating Fannie Mae for investing in the Chicago Climate Exchange, outside their charter - and where did "free as a bird, guilty as Hell" Franklin Raines go?
  3. the Emerald Cities Collaborative (founded 12/2009) and their Board of Directors
  4. the Wizard thereof -- one Joel Rogers, founder of Emerald Cities, and... Rogers also founded of The New Party (I think Trevor Loudon likely knew this already, I have to get back in better touch with Trevor, now that I'm posting again)... and the Apollo Alliance (which wrote a lot of the antiStimulus Act) -- Andy Stern and Van Jones love Rogers for the mastermind he is, pulling alchemist's levers and ropes of the Marxofascist Money Machinery behind the curtain at the University of Wisconsin
By the way, just what is Andy Stern doing, since he left SEIU on that day that Barack Obama went AWOL, saying he went to see one of his two Russian-named daughters play soccer?

And by the way, both Beck and Sarah Palin were listed in Time Magazine's "100 Most Influential People in America" and... Sarah Palin did the clever Glenn Beck write-up, there. (Palin on Beck, also Ted Nugent on Palin.) Is that not a fascinating combination of overlapped signaling?:
  1. Sarah Palin signals to us awake and aware Americans that she knows what is going on (at least as much as do we, anyway).
  2. Time Magazine signals to fellow "progressive" evils, "Hey! See! Sarah Palin knows what's going on!"
I still wish I had more time to keep up, but there are things I can do, to help you drill down into this "GREATEST SCANDAL IN MODERN HISTORY," which of course includes the plan, to "disrupt, demolish, and defeat" authentic America and its Sovereign Americans... which plan, of course spins around Barack Obama. -- AW
photo: Patriot Network

Tuesday, April 27, 2010

THE GREATEST SCANDAL IN MODERN HISTORY - Treason in Process

"Crime, Inc." is what Glenn Beck is calling it.

Updated, 4/28/2010
- Initial post, 4/27, 2:00pm CT

Both of these videos are from Monday evening, April 26th. The Financial Times article is from this Sunday. They are elements of the most extensive scandal perhaps, since original sin.

While the Beck video is even much more significant than this, the point is that Barack Obama personally nixed real reform in the Obamafinance bill. The transparency would have gotten in the way of the astounding plan of which he is a focal point. This entire interview is important, but be sure to listen after the two minute mark, as Greta Van Susteren interviews Senator Jim DeMint.


Next, put that together with this story, out of Financial Times. This is where Barack Obama and his network are driving us. It is global corporatism, i.e., Marxofascism:
U.S. Prepares to Push for Global Capital Rules
Financial Times ^ | Sunday April 25, 2010 | Tom Braithwaite

The US is preparing to pivot from domestic regulatory reform to a push for a tough new international capital regime after the weekend’s G20 and International Monetary Fund meetings glossed over differences between leading economies.

Tim Geithner, US Treasury secretary, met Mario Draghi, chairman of the Financial Stability Board, on Sunday to discuss the contours of a system that would decide the safety and profitability of banks for decades to come and could eclipse the arguments over bank taxes and regulation.

One participant at a US Federal Reserve meeting this month to discuss the new regime said “full and frank” did not do justice to the furious response from some industry delegates.

continued at Financial Times

Next, we have Glenn Beck spelling out more of the story that Lord Christopher Monckton began to tell us, in October, 2009 and that Jesse Ventura related in one of his Conspiracy Theory programs. It has also been discussed by Brannon Howse and yes, by some of those "odd" conspiracy theory sites on the Internet (where there are human beings, conspiracy like fecal matter, happens).

Once again, of course, Barack Obama is front and center, along with the Chicago Climate Exchange, the Joyce Foundation, George Soros, Maurice Strong, Edmund de Rothschild, the Federal Reserve, Goldman Sachs, George W. Bush's Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, even Fannie Mae, and many others.
It entails global Marxofascism / global kleptocracy, with Americans being the chief victims, while a few overlords rule at, and their financiers skim off, the top. If any "mainstream" reporters cared to cover this thoroughly (and could) they could be much bigger characters in U.S. and world history than Woodward and Bernstein. And as for Americans willingly instigating this, it is treason.

Here is a great part of their entire, one-world plan. Element by element, this beast is designed to virtually enslave, yes, the entire world. That includes the "nation" of America. That includes you.

T H E   S T O R Y


The remainder of Glenn Beck's expose', components of what is behind the Chicago Climate Exchange and so much more, the subterfuge of global Marxofascism as environmentalism and the bigger picture:


Watch this.
Spread it to everyone.

It is extensive evidence of the story.

Permission to reproduce granted - AW

For more within Investigating Obama about this, I suggest that little search bar up in the upper left corner. There, you may wish to search the words, "Simpson," or "Monckton," or "Obamanomics," or... "Soros" ...or a whole lot of "Marxofascist." And, check out the I.O. Sidebar's "Essential Articles" -- and always, the various categories of I.O. blogrolls.

Obama DHHS Buried Info on Obamacare Cost Increases, Before Vote

Updates, below

Now on Fox News: The bad news reached the White House just before the vote on Capitol Hill "and they went into lockdown," that according to an unnamed staff member of the Department of Health and Human Services. This should be very big news that makes it though the Marxstream media defenses.

At the same time, I.O. will be underscoring some much bigger news that eeked out, once again though the Fox News channel, last night. (Including but far from only, Barack Obama; "Think global....")

Meanwhile, here is the report, from American Spectator's Washington Prowler, which Brett Baier and Megyn Kelly cite:
What Lies Beneath

OFFICE POLITICS
The economic report released last week by Health and Human Services, which indicated that President Barack Obama's health care "reform" law would actually increase the cost of health care and impose higher costs on consumers, had been submitted to the office of HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius more than a week before the Congressional votes on the bill, according to career HHS sources, who added that Sebelius's staff refused to review the document before the vote was taken.

"The reason we were given was that they did not want to influence the vote," says an HHS source. "Which is actually the point of having a review like this, you would think."

The analysis, performed by Medicare's Office of the Actuary, which in the past has been identified as a "nonpolitical" office, set off alarm bells when submitted. "We know a copy was sent to the White House via their legislative affairs staff," says the HHS staffer, "and there were a number of meetings here almost right after the analysis was submitted to the secretary's office. Everyone went into lockdown, and people here were too scared to go public with the report."

In the end, the report was released several weeks after the vote -- the review by the secretary's office reportedly took less than three days -- and bore a note that the analysis was not the official position of the Obama administration.

at the source

But do not be too taken by this story. Be sure to see two videos that I.O. will be presenting, next. It will present a much bigger picture, very much about Barack Obama, but very very much about so much more.

By the way, you may wish to refer to an earlier piece reported in I.O.:
'Word of the Lord,' April 2010

I.O. intends to link, with comments, to numerous items recently appearing on the 'net, which further expose Barry Soetoro (a.k.a., Barack Obama) and the "transnational progressive" (i.e., Marxofascist globalist) network of which he is knit. Before I do, one additional, current, Christian prophecy is here submitted for examination by those who will, from someone whose prior missive is linked in I.O's immediate prior posting.
Word of the Lord April 2010, by Prophet Phyllis Ford
March 27, 2010

[excerpt]:
The government will continue to be shaken, and the more she is shaken the more uncovering will come to light. There is some key information that will be found out that was a part of back room deals that have occurred, and as a result the secrets of government leadership will be uncovered. There are those who are standing in the gap, and my work will continue to move forward. There will be change and divine turnaround before the dust clearly settles
Amen.

Update 4/27/2010 1:09pm CT - According to Bret Baier, the DHS is denying this Prowler report, but actually they are admitting they did have the data needed to calculate the budget overruns, well before the House vote. They are merely saying they had not calculated it all until April 22nd. One would hope Mr. Baier and his colleagues are not accepting that fig leavery out of hand. Now, wouldn't that be a nice way to cover up? "Oops! These numbers aren't in line with what we've told America! I've got an idea! Let's stop calculating them until it's over!"

Does someone need to tell Bret Baier that computers and spreadsheets make calculations very fast, in this day and age? Get real and get a little investigative, Fox News. Or are you going to let others do all your work and accept everything you hear from the White House? Even if this excuse is true (and come on, now) how irresponsible would it be, for the DHS to have this data and not to calculate it before the House vote? Good grief, Mr. Baier.

How long does it take to calculate? They certainly seem to be able to draft thousands of pages of legislation in a hurry.

Update
4/28/2010 1:09pm CT - Below is Bret Baier's prior evening news report (not on April 27th).


Other commentators have piped-up about this very reported cover-up.
In Gateway Pundit and in BigGovernment.com...
Breaking: Dems Hid Damning Health Care Report From Public Until a Month After Vote!
by Jim Hoft, on Monday, April 26, 2010, 10:13 PM

And in WorldNetDaily.com...
DOCTOR'S ORDERS
Did Obama hide damning health-care report?
'Everyone here went into lockdown, people were too scared to go public'
by Drew Zahn, April 27, 2010, 5:58 pm ET
[excerpt]

Richard Foster, chief actuary of the office that produced the report, told WND the Spectator article "is completely inaccurate."

"We began working on the reconciliation bill for the health reform legislation once it was publicly issued on March 18 – three days before the House vote took place on March 21," Foster said in a statement. "Because of the details and complexity of the legislation, it wasn't possible to estimate the package before the Senate vote. We began work on the estimates right away, but we didn't finalize them until the afternoon of April 22.

"We finished our memorandum on the health reform act later that same day and immediately sent it to those individuals and organizations that had requested it, including congressional staff, HHS staff and media representatives," he concluded. "Consistent with the Office of the Actuary's longstanding independent role on behalf of Congress, we did not seek approval or clearance from HHS (or anyone else) before issuing our analysis."

Foster also sent a letter only days before the critical health-care vote in the House to Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell explaining there was no way the actuaries could complete their analysis before the critical March 21, 2010, deadline.

"My staff and I will not be able to prepare our analysis within this very tight time frame, due to the complexity of the legislation," Foster wrote.

And now we have what would seem to be a logical way of providing cover for a cover-up. Did every jot and tittle have to be completely finished, for the DHHS to know of the huge overruns in projections, even if they actually didn't have time to prepare their analysis?

Permission to reproduce granted - AW

Monday, April 26, 2010

Leo Haffey Jailed in TN for Seeking Constitutional Justice regarding Obama? And the 4/20 Darren Huff Detainment

Update 4/26: Huff and Haffey were quite informative; this was an important conversation. You may read more about Leo Haffey's plight at http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/category/nashville and at http://freeleohaffey.blogspot.com."The Awakening" returns, on Sentinel Radio, with Arlen and Hanen.

Why was Leo Haffey jailed, in Tennessee?


Why was Darren Huff just pulled-over and detained by the Tennessee state and county police
, in a separate incident? (link to video)

Guests: Darren Huff and Leo Haffey
Listen tonight, Monday, 4/26 at 9-11pm ET (6-8pm PT)

You may use the widget at Investigating Obama, just below on this page...
...or by visiting the Sentinel Radio page and chat room...
...or call to listen, at 646-727-2652.


Why was Leo Haffey recently jailed for sixty days? Was he incarcerated without charges? Falsely labeled a mental patient? Who did this? How was he freed? Through legal processes, Haffey has been seeking constitutional justice regarding the man who would be called President Obama. [Ed., Leo Haffey's site on the Citizens' Grand Jury: http://grandjury.blogtownhall.com/]

And if this story were not odd enough, just this past Tuesday, April 20, while Mr. Haffey happened to be a guest caller on the G. Gordon Liddy Program (special guests were eligibility objector, Lt. Col. Terry Lakin and his attorney - report and audio archive, here) a number of people were driving to a meeting with Walter Fitzpatrick. One of them was Darren Huff, who will introduce himself to you, tonight.

Why was Darren Huff on the highway shoulder with the police for ninety minutes, on his way to this meeting?

Why did they want to search his car? Was it because of his "Oath Keepers" sign? Is this a part of an Obama/Napolitano DHS surveillance plan for the constitutional justice movement? Why did they decide not to search the car - while detaining him for an hour and a half on the highway? [I.O. Ed., Darren says thirty minutes and that they were engaged in healthy and instructive conversation for an hour after that.] Mr. Huff will fill in the important blanks, from his perspective. See the video report of this April 20th incident.

We hope to have time for call-in questions, at 646-727-2652 (option 1, to ask a question). Afterward, the netcast will be archived, for future reference.

Friday, April 23, 2010

Obamafinance - Palin: Institutionalizing Crony Capitalism, Soros: Go for it

Update, 4/25/2010 - See comments below, which provide excellent perspective about this critical issue

Sarah Palin
says it is "crony capitalism." Has a friend sent her latest Facebook essay to you in an email?

The hacks at Goldman Sachs say the password is "partner," as Governor Palin points out, below.

Ron Paul says "corporatism."

Yes, yes, and yes. And such fascistic, ministerial control is the initial structural focus of the neo-Marxist. It is Barack Obama's necessary step onto the treasonous road to a pseudo-democratic “dictatorship of the proletariat” and the unnatural and impossible communist dream of egalitarian collectivism. In this scheme, "too big to fail" is the excuse where that excuse may work, while the point is that the few, large institutions should be amoeba-like consuming enough to afford control over the entire market and eventually, the entire economy.

In the wake of the recent financial meltdown, Americans know that we need reform. Not only have many individuals learned lessons about personal responsibility through this, but we’ve been able to engage in a discussion about government’s appropriate role.

The current debate over financial reform demonstrates what happens when political leaders react to a crisis with a raft of new regulations. First off, the people involved in writing government regulations are often lobbyists from the very industry that the new laws are supposed to regulate, and that’s been the case here. It should surprise no one that financial lobbyists are flocking to DC this week. Of course, the big players who can afford lobbyists work the regulations in their favor, while their smaller competitors are left out in the cold. The result here are regulations that institutionalize the “too big to fail” mentality.

Moreover, the financial reform bill gives regulators the power to pick winners and losers, institutionalizing their ability to decide “which firms to rescue or close, and which creditors to reward and how.” Does anyone doubt that firms with the most lobbyists and the biggest campaign donations will be the ones who get seats in the lifeboat? The president is trying to convince us that he’s taking on the Wall Street “fat cats,” but firms like Goldman Sachs are happy with federal regulation because, as one of their lobbyists recently stated, “We partner with regulators.”

They seem to have a nice relationship with the White House too. Goldman showered nearly a million dollars in campaign contributions on candidate Obama. In fact, J.P. Freire notes that President Obama received about seven times more money from Goldman than President Bush received from Enron. Of course, it’s not just the donations; it’s the revolving door. You’ll find the name Goldman Sachs on many an Obama administration résumé, including Rahm Emanuel’s and Tim Geithner’s chief of staff’s.

We need to be on our guard against such crony capitalism. We fought against distortion of the market in Alaska when we confronted “Big Oil,” or more specifically some of the players in the industry and in political office, who were taking the 49th state for a ride. My administration challenged lax rules that seemed to allow corruption, and we even challenged the largest corporation in the world at the time for not abiding by provisions in contracts it held with the state. When it came time to craft a plan for a natural gas pipeline, we insisted on transparency and a level playing field to insure fair competition. Our reforms helped reduce politicians’ ability to play favorites and helped clean up corruption. We set up stricter oversight offices and ushered through a bi-partisan ethics reform bill. Far from being against necessary reform, I embrace it.

Commonsense conservatives acknowledge the need for financial reform and believe that government can play an appropriate role in leveling the playing field and protecting “the dynamism of American capitalism without neglecting the government’s responsibility to protect the American public.” We’re listening closely to the reform discussion in Washington, and we know that government should not burden the market with unnecessary bureaucracy and distorted incentives, nor make a dangerous “too-big-to-fail” mentality the law of the land.

- Sarah Palin
Real reform and truly appropriate regulation can be very difficult to instill, amidst entrenched, corrupt politics and an ideological enmity to the truly virtuous republicanism authentic to America. I personally know of no one with better experience as a pathfinder in just that reform, than Sarah Palin.

Concurrently, George Soros weighs in. Yes, Marxists go right for the banks. To prove the point to which I above allude, that truly evil, transnationalist master of manipulation (and of timing) has just written on the subject, too.

Big news! He is for Obamafinance plus more and he spills the beans about what that means. He espouses the complete ministerial control of derivatives and has done quite a job of posing this anti-American tyranny as, of course, the only sensible and heroic solution, with the interest of the people in mind. He calls his essay, "America Must Face Up to the Dangers of Derivatives," as if Soros, the economy destroyer, cared about dangers to economies, in his Pinky and the Brain megalomind.

Soros' writings on the "open society" are hyper-abstract rationalizations for global Marxist tyranny. Have you noticed that Barack Obama does not like to use the word "freedom" in his speeches and has actually used the phrase, "open society," in lieu of that word? Substitute the words "globally controlled" for "open;" I leave it up to Soros, to explain the tortured pseudo-synonym.

Rep. Michelle Bachmann has called this initiative worse than Obamacare. Are we learning why?

AW - permission to repost

Thursday, April 22, 2010

The Tennessee Harassment - Police Surveillance & Steak-out of Oath Keeper - Video Report

Excellent citizen reporting of an exemplary Oath Keeper response (I.O. would call it a very "teachable moment," if a fleeting bit of time could learn anything)

At this moment and in the interest of time, I will avoid further reporting, but to point to Carl Swensson's phone call into the G. Gordon Liddy program (see "Update-2," of this I.O. post) which is how this story broke on Tuesday 4/20. Also, to that day's Globe & Email report, "Citizen Apprehended en route to Fitzpatrick Hearing in Tennessee."

Evidently, the Obama regime's Department of Homeland Security, under Janet Napolitano, is having some sway, by her communiques to America's various law enforcement offices labeling supporters of the United States Constitution as "potential terrorists" -- especially if they include our greatly esteemed military personnel and veterans.


I am told this video from Carl Swensson and presumably the meeting these patriots were on their way to attend were not events authorized by Oath Keepers.

There is more to come from I.O. on this Tennessee focus of the Global Marxofascist Insurrection against Sovereign Americans, Barack Obama, "Commander in Chief" of the former. We have some catching up to do, regarding the stories of Walter Fitzpatrick and Leo Haffey. - AW


UPDATE - Details are not complete, but Sentinel Radio's "The Awakening" will broadcast again, probably beginning this coming Monday, 4/26/2010, 9-11pm ET. We are firming up guests to include Leo Haffey and one or two of those people involved in, or connected with this incident. I.O. and the Sentinel Radio Blog will apprise and link.

Barack Obama Argued Strict Revolutionary Marxism to John C. Drew, at Occidental College

That is the testimony of someone who has maintained significant responsibilities and who would seem to be an honorable man. I am requesting an interview with this man ,who bears witness to the determined, anti-American Marxism of Barack Obama, while a student at Occidental College. The following article and interviews resounded (remurmured?) through at least a bit of the conservative 'net media, this past February. At this point, they can stand for themselves. I may either update this post or add comments in another.

John C. Drew, Ph.D. featured in the Newsmax article, "Obama Espoused Radical Views in College," by Ronald Kessler, 2/8/2010.

Interviewed by Scott Baker and Liz Stephans of The B-Cast, 2/12/2010


Drew interviewed on another recent occasion (2/16/2010-?)

Link: College Acquaintance: Young Obama Was 'Pure Marxis

With a few more questions, I think there is more to gain from Dr. Drew, and to explore with him. This appears to be critical, empirical knowledge of Obama at his political and even personal core. It should be put into informed perspective and then we will find his worldview explaining -- perhaps predicting the steps he takes, and their objectives and ramifications in both the short term and long -- actions which must be defeated.
Whether Panama hats were discussed is not necessarily one of those questions.

Wednesday, April 21, 2010

Goldman Sachs - Where's the Poetic Justice? - To Rush for Judgment

Goldman and Obama,
Goldman and Geithner,
Goldman, the Paulsons, and the Fed;
Goldman for money,
Goldman for Marxists,
Goldman, for control o'er your head.


Rush Limbaugh asserts today, "Oh ho no! Goldman's in on this; they'll pay a litttle bitty fine here, but I mean they're gonna be sitting pretty once this bill passes." He reads an email from a friend of his, whether inside or outside the beltway:
You know Rush, we have spent a zillion years working in or closely observing the federal government. Now, Bill Clinton's war room was an amazing monstrosity, but I have never seen anything like this kind of strategic intermingling of a bare knuckles political operation with the levers of power. And the cynicism about how stupid the American Public must be is breathtaking.

Even as Gibbs and Emanuel are denying the SEC case and the push for new regulations have nothing to do with each other, Obama's Alinskyites are buying Web links knowing that people will be surfing to get information about the case, assuring that they'll get Obama's spin first.

I mean who even thinks of doing this stuff? Yet they're not just thinking about it, they're doing it! I don't think he's competent at anything else, except giving speeches from a teleprompter, but I do think this guy knows the tactical community organizer stuff through and through and Alinskyite community organizing is a mix of the lawful, the barely lawful, and the clearly unlawful and the extortionate...
"...which is what they call 'direct action,'" concludes Limbaugh, "pretty much what the Gambino family calls 'making an offer you can't refuse.' That's what Obama is a professional at and that's what's frightening to watch."

This step in the revolution is "where we're at." Next, we will look back, to John C. Drew's account of college age Barry Obama's vehement insistence upon the success of a sophisticated Marxist strategy for overcoming America, already firm in his mind in his undergraduate days at Occidental College.

Many, from Rolling Stone Magazine, to even conventionally conservative publications have dipped their lenses under the surface of Goldman Sachs' recent role in the cause of engineering global Marxofascism. We are likely to present some of those dots, connected for you in the near future, too. - AW

Tuesday, April 20, 2010

G. Gordon Liddy's Interview of Lt. Col. Terry Lakin, Today

Update 1 - In the second segment, Jerome Corsi does a very good job of correcting the false, shoot-from-the-hip assumption of Bill O'Reilly, Michelle Malkin, and others, that the alleged Certificate of Live Birth, plus the two newspaper birth announcements are any credible evidence at all, of Obama being born in Hawaii, without review (and perhaps investigation) of the actual, original birth certificate.

Update 2 - Also in the second segment, Carl Swensson called in and gave his account of the following, reported in The Post & Email, "Citizen Apprehended en route to Fitzpatrick Hearing in Tennessee." This apparent police apprehension of an Oath Keeper is a new element in another story that bears monitoring. Also worth critical review has been the disturbing case of Leo Haffey, who called during the first segment reporting his own story of being kept for sixty days in jail, for communicating about the real Barack Obama. More about Leo Haffey may be read from numerous sources, including the Citizen Wells and The Steady Drip blogs (search "Haffey" there).

<<<<<<<<<<<<<> I.O. <>>>>>>>>>>>>>


While the I.O. Sidebar has been reporting the eligibility news, non-stop, I have not done any writing about it, recently. "Saving up," maybe. Not to slight any of the other important news, as the case against Barry Soetoro (and the endemic breakdown of Constitutional order and justice, throughout the United States of America) builds, below is a link to the G. Gordon Liddy program today, streaming.

It is ground breaking. You can hear it in the voices.
GGL - 4-20-10 H1
Tuesday, April 20, 2010 11:22 AM
In his only interview, Lt Col. Terry Lakin, along with his lawyer Paul Jensen, tells The G-Man why he is refusing to deploy to Afghanistan until President Obama proves he is a natural-born citizen. Also joining us in this hour are Dr. Jerome Corsi and Joseph Farah of World Net Daily.
Media files
000001790_000_000000006.mp3 (MPEG Layer 3 Audio File, 14.4 MB)


GGL - 4-20-10 H2
Tuesday, April 20, 2010 12:25 PM

Is Lt. Col. Terry Lakin a hero or a criminal? Well, our callers seem united in their belief he is a hero. Hear him explain, in his only interview, why he is refusing orders to deploy to Afghanistan until President Obama proves he is a natural-born citizen. Also joining us is Lakin's lawyer, Paul Jensen.
Media files
000001791_000_000000006.mp3 (MPEG Layer 3 Audio File, 14.4 MB)
More may be read about this interview at WorldNetDaily's piece, "Born in the USA? Important question about Constitution." And remember, this is about whether Obama is a "natural born Citizen," not merely whether he was born in America. Remember that book which the Father of our Country did not return to the library and all the other evidence of the two-parent Citizenship requirement. And remember there appears to be evidence that any American Citizenship for Barry Soetoro may have been forsworn, in Indonesia.

WND, thank you, please remember not to entitle your articles in ways which distract from the larger matter and the "preponderance of the evidence."

Sunday, April 18, 2010

BarackObama.com Admits His Aim of Marxist Financial Market 'Control'

Come read an email from "Organizing for America," the Democratic National Committee, and Barack Obama. In it you will see a confession: their new financial regulatory initiative seeks to "control" the entire derivatives market.

In other words, barackobama.com admits their aim is Marxist. Feel free to read the entire email, to find the key phrase. Or, below that, I show the phrase, with closing comments.
Subject: A presidential veto
Saturday, April 17, 2010 11:42 PM
From: "Mitch Stewart, BarackObama.com"
To: "Arlen Williams"

Arlen --

President Obama means business.

He's committed his administration to reining in Wall Street and creating the strongest consumer protections in history. And on Friday he made it clear that we can't allow another devastating financial crisis -- so he'll veto any reform bill that doesn't bring the derivatives market under control.

But the Senate could begin debate as soon as this week, and Republican leaders are teaming up with Wall Street lobbyists to defeat the bill -- so the President needs your help to show that the American people stand with him on Wall Street reform:

http://my.barackobama.com/StandForWallStreetReform

Thanks,

Mitch

P.S. -- Don't miss the President's message from Friday below.

-------------Original Message-------------
From: Barack Obama
Subject: Wall Street reform

Friend --

It has now been well over a year since the near collapse of our entire financial system that cost the nation more than 8 million jobs. To this day, hard-working families struggle to make ends meet.

We've made strides -- businesses are starting to hire, Americans are finding jobs, and neighbors who had given up looking are returning to the job market with new hope. But the flaws in our financial system that led to this crisis remain unresolved.

Wall Street titans still recklessly speculate with borrowed money. Big banks and credit card companies stack the deck to earn millions while far too many middle-class families, who have done everything right, can barely pay their bills or save for a better future.

We cannot delay action any longer. It is time to hold the big banks accountable to the people they serve, establish the strongest consumer protections in our nation's history -- and ensure that taxpayers will never again be forced to bail out big banks because they are "too big to fail."

That is what Wall Street reform will achieve, why I am so committed to making it happen, and why I'm asking for your help today.

Please stand with me to show your support for Wall Street reform.


We know that without enforceable, commonsense rules to check abuse and protect families, markets are not truly free. Wall Street reform will foster a strong and vibrant financial sector so that businesses can get loans; families can afford mortgages; entrepreneurs can find the capital to start a new company, sell a new product, or offer a new service.

Consumer financial protections are currently spread across seven different government agencies. Wall Street reform will create one single Consumer Financial Protection Agency -- tasked with preventing predatory practices and making sure you get the clear information, not fine print, needed to avoid ballooning mortgage payments or credit card rate hikes.

Reform will provide crucial new oversight, give shareholders a say on salaries and bonuses, and create new tools to break up failing financial firms so that taxpayers aren't forced into another unfair bailout. And reform will keep our economy secure by ensuring that no single firm can bring down the whole financial system.

With so much at stake, it is not surprising that allies of the big banks and Wall Street lenders have already launched a multi-million-dollar ad campaign to fight these changes. Arm-twisting lobbyists are already storming Capitol Hill, seeking to undermine the strong bipartisan foundation of reform with loopholes and exemptions for the most egregious abusers of consumers.

I won't accept anything short of the full protection that our citizens deserve and our economy needs. It's a fight worth having, and it is a fight we can win -- if we stand up and speak out together.

So I'm asking you to join me, starting today, by adding your name as a strong supporter of Wall Street reform:

http://my.barackobama.com/StandForWallStreetReform


Thank you,

President Barack Obama


Paid for by Organizing for America, a project of the Democratic National Committee -- 430 South Capitol Street SE, Washington, D.C. 20003. This communication is not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee.

Did you notice the confession? It comes before the deceptive, slipstream propaganda of Barack Obama's "PS." It is not just that he labels opposition, in true Marxofascist agitprop, as coming from "big banks and Wall Street lenders," in Obama's terms, out to protect "egregious abusers of consumers."

No. It lays wide open for all to read, in the third sentence of this email. I will emphasize the words: "And on Friday he made it clear that we can't allow another devastating financial crisis -- so he'll veto any reform bill that doesn't bring the derivatives market under control."

To control a market under government is the essential nature of Communism. It could be regarded as even more extreme than Fascism. And now, you have seen it from the perpetrators, themselves.

What is a clearer admission of Barack Obama's Marxism than this?

The governmental control involved in this legislation is currently being explained by others. In this humble article, the admission by Obama's personnel is left to speak for itself. Someone who believes in American political philosophy does not speak of "bringing" a market "under control." The most severe word is "regulation," which is far different. Authentic American regulation seeks to allow the market to function freely by preventing it from being controlled, or grossly manipulated or dominated.

Feel very free to show this to your neighbors, the media, and your members of Congress. -- AW

(A thorough explanation of the term, "derivatives" may found here, courtesy of hedgefund-index.com.)